govenment's envolvement with 9/11

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 11:58 AM
link   
did the govenment try to cover up something when the twin towers were raized. they didnt even make a full investigation into the subject? there are pleanty of jeaunalusts who would ask these questions but are afraid of the consequences if u search for what really happened on 9/11 then there are loads of sites bout this topic tell me what u think




posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 04:54 PM
link   
I've got more, but this will do for now. I'll post more later on.

1) The entire United States intelligence community knew of the 9/11 attacks before hand, including the fact that commercial jets were to be used as bombs; they also knew the approximate dates and possible targets but were called off their investigations. Western intelligence had been aware of plans for such terrorist attacks on U.S. soil as early as 1995. The plan was known as "Project Bojinka." It was known to both the CIA and FBI and was described in court documents in the trial in New York of Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Murad for their participation in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC).

2) There is incontrovertible evidence that the US Air Force all across the country was comprehensively "stood down" on the morning of September 11th. Routine security measures, normally in place, which may well have been able to prevent the attacks, or reduce their impact, were suspended for one hour while the attacks were in progress, and re-instated once they were over.

3) Neither the Joint Chief of Staff, the Secretary of Defense nor the President of the United States acted according to well established emergency protocols. Acting Joint Chief of Staff General Richard B. Myers stated that he saw a TV report about a plane hitting the WTC but thought it was a small plane. So he went ahead with his meeting. By the time he came out of the meeting the Pentagon had been hit. Whose responsibility was it to relay this emergency to the Joint Chief of Staff?
The Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was at his desk when AA77 crashed into the Pentagon. How is it possible that the National Military Command Center, located in the Pentagon and in contact with law enforcement and air traffic controllers from 8:46 a.m., did not communicate to the Secretary of Defense, also at the Pentagon, about the other hijacked planes especially the one headed to Washington? After he was notified, why did he go to the war room?
The actions of the President, while the attacks were occurring, indicate that he deliberately avoided doing anything reasonably expected of a President wanting to protect American citizens and property. Why didn't the Secret Service inform him of this national emergency? When is a President supposed to be notified of everything the agencies know? Why was the President permitted by the Secret Service to remain in the Sarasota elementary school? At 9.05, nineteen minutes after the first attack and two minutes after the second attack on the WTC, Andrew Card, the presidential chief of staff, whispered something in President Bushs ear. The president did not react as if he was interested in trying to do something about the situation. He did not leave the school, convene an emergency meeting, consult with anybody, or intervene in any way, to ensure that the Air Force completed its job. He did not even mention the extraordinary events occurring in New York, but simply continued with the reading class. His own explanations of his actions that day contradict known facts.
In the case of a national emergency, seconds of indecision could cost thousands of lives; and it's precisely for this reason that the government has a whole network of adjuncts and
advisors to insure that these top officials are among the first to be informed, not the last. Where were these individuals who did not properly inform the top officials?
In short, the CIA, the DCI, the State Department, the President, and key figures around him in the White House, were ultimately responsible for doing nothing in the face of the mounting evidence of an impending threat to U.S. national security. Incompetence is a highly improbable explanation.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:11 PM
link   
see why I dont trust them



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:29 PM
link   
i guess they thought it couldnt happen just like most people



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:36 PM
link   
But are people not getting the point about this event,

that the government is not really the ones in charge?



posted on Nov, 30 2003 @ 06:43 PM
link   
Maybe it was a plan to give reason in the publics eyes to attack Osama and Saddam because they are on a covert to take out the leaders that would oppose a NWO rising. Far fetched I know, but who knows



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 10:27 AM
link   
i dont trust americans either . i think their helbent on taking over the world and are the most dangerous people in the world today. The russians should have destroyed america when they had the chance



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 10:30 AM
link   
one the documentary i watched the front windows were blown out from an elleged explosion that came down the elevator shaft, then like 5 minutes later ppl come down the undamaged elevator, now u would think the elevator would alteast show some signs of being burnt by an explosion if it was even working. it's not like it's the first time this has happened, i dunno why ppl take so much #



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 10:34 AM
link   
I'm an American and not hellbent on taking over the world. Now, let me make a generalization...Americans, in my opinion, are arrogant. They seem to believe that they are superior to the rest of the world's inhabitants.

The real problem is authority.



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 10:52 AM
link   
i just perticularly hate patriotism which american's like in the bucketfull and liers



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 11:13 AM
link   
Many of the 9-11 hijackers, are actually still alive

link

and it isn;t just the US, but Israel who had a big hand in 9-11 too

link

I personally believe that the CIA hatched the plan, put everything in place, recruited the patsies, but they DID not pull the trigger. They gave the gun, the target, but the trigger was pulled by muslim fanatics...

~Messiah~



posted on Dec, 1 2003 @ 06:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by MUDDYFOX
did the govenment try to cover up something when the twin towers were raized. they didnt even make a full investigation into the subject? there are pleanty of jeaunalusts who would ask these questions but are afraid of the consequences if u search for what really happened on 9/11 then there are loads of sites bout this topic tell me what u think



I see this ALL THE TIME!

Goverment HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!

LIBERALS LOOK AROUND, WAKE UP, AND SMELL THE COFFEE!



posted on Dec, 2 2003 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Russian

Originally posted by MUDDYFOX
did the govenment try to cover up something when the twin towers were raized. they didnt even make a full investigation into the subject? there are pleanty of jeaunalusts who would ask these questions but are afraid of the consequences if u search for what really happened on 9/11 then there are loads of sites bout this topic tell me what u think



I see this ALL THE TIME!

Goverment HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!

LIBERALS LOOK AROUND, WAKE UP, AND SMELL THE COFFEE!




Russian, even if the government had nothing to do with 9/11, the deliberate ignoring of intellegence, both foreign and US, still makes them just as guilty. They allowed the attacks to happen, either with ignorance or malliciousness(sp?)



posted on Dec, 2 2003 @ 06:39 PM
link   
Whoa! And I thought terrorists who kill innocents were scary.


All the anti-american sentiment is making me cry.

READ THIS: Widespread, remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator. What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record:

This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as most generous and possibly the least appreciated people on all the earth.

Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States.

When the France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it. When distant cities are hit by earthquakes, it is the United States that hurries in to help. This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes. Nobody helped.

The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent, warmongering Americans. I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States Dollar build its own airplane. Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar, or the Douglas 10? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American planes?

Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the moon? You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios. You talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy, and you find men on the moon not once, but several times - and safely home again.

You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at. Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here.

When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the American who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke.

I can name you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one of those.




posted on Dec, 3 2003 @ 10:37 AM
link   
stop giving me that DEBT CRAP that was 60 years ago and i h8 it especially that blair thinks we should pay a debt back to americans cauze hes wrong. america can stand on its own two lazy feet for once and **** off



posted on Dec, 3 2003 @ 11:32 AM
link   
The CIA knew about it...and no investigation took place...well...at least never was told to the fullest. Let's go back to 1947 after WWII...the Bush family formed the CIA..they are know to be Jewish Nazis...go figure...they have ties to terrorist groups. The CIA is basically the same thing as Hitler's SS corp...in power just to "weed" out the bad apples...the weak...the "threatening"...to keep control over the masses while they use propaganda and brainwashing to do so. "Government" is a tricky word now in America...our government is run by the rich...which I consider as the NWO...industrialist...commercialism...and freedom slave drivers. Couple other notes...think about these two things. The Security Exchange Commision had evidence in one of the towers to bring down the Bush family when 9/11 occured. And...one of George Bush's relatives was in charge for security/maintenence of the towers also when it occured. That will make you think...eh?



posted on Dec, 3 2003 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by MUDDYFOX
stop giving me that DEBT CRAP that was 60 years ago and i h8 it especially that blair thinks we should pay a debt back to americans cauze hes wrong. america can stand on its own two lazy feet for once and **** off


Well, I guess we are on our lazy two feet now and f-you very much. Bunch of sodding Brits go have your tea. You either need the USA, Canada, heck even Australia to hold your freaking hand to do anything. If they are not available then you call for Ireland, Scotland, or even France. Most of the time...none of them can stand you either.

You can't stand alone...is that not why you created the Commonwealth?


Xeongod - Interesting stuff about Bush and all, but I just don't buy it. I don't think the SEC had evidence. Just speculation to create a conspiracy tie-in.



posted on Dec, 3 2003 @ 02:06 PM
link   
secado i have nothing against the people of america just their govenment and a lot of other govenments including my own



posted on Dec, 3 2003 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by MUDDYFOX
i dont trust americans either . i think their helbent on taking over the world and are the most dangerous people in the world today. The russians should have destroyed america when they had the chance

not all americans are like you stated. arrogant maybe but no more so than anybody else from anywhere else. america is in the spotlight now so its ok to point fingers. point away going by what you say most of us have our noses so high in the air we wont be able to see your little fingers.



posted on May, 22 2004 @ 08:44 PM
link   
America is full of lovely benevolent people, and also home to the scum of the earth. Its a big place.

All this anti american sentiment springs directly from the exploitative and patronising foreign policy, and the fact that American government always sells itself to the lowest common denominator. They wouldnt get any of the redneck votes otherwise.





new topics
top topics
 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join