It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

are you a homophobe????

page: 10
1
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 06:05 PM
link   
The tests says I am highly homophobic, but I do like copping off with other blokes though!



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Actually Intrepid..I like to post something that Is not the standard emotional default setting that passes for excellence today. I am not usually that emotional that I will give it a free pass to play through ..especially when it is ignorance.
Also ..no I dont think we should go back to the days of the Cleavers. Women today are doing so m uch ...multitasknig and all..just leaving men totally behind in every category..you know ..doing all the things men are doing and doing a better job of it....they obviously dont need default settings to play through anymore...so I tend to hold them to it..especially when sex and sexualty seems to be their only talent in life. Watch what happens when you try to get one to think outside the standard settings. Talk about flack. I expect alot from the women around me...especailly today..problem is getting them to deliver. Very hard to work outside of the "Girl Stuff " religion when it is ones mainstay.

Good post shumer...I pretty much agree..thanks ..Orangetom



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 06:48 PM
link   
I meant stumason instead of shumer in my last post..sorry
Orangetom



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 06:55 PM
link   
No worries, call me what you like, I don't mind



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 01:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Take a test to determine what my beliefs are?

I need no test to know that a sin is wrong, that the counterculture forces are trying to make wrong right and those who believe in the real right to be considered wrong.

I have no problem with someone who is a homosexual, I have my own sins to deal with, thank you very much. My beef is with those who expect me to embrace the perverted lifestyle as normal and want to attack traditional culture.

We are getting to be like Sodom and Gomorrah. We worship ourselves above all else, we pursue whatever kind of physical pleasure we can think of.


I was called a homophobe, but I do not fear gays. Why would I fear gays?
Psalm 23
1 The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want. 2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters. 3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake. 4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. 5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over. 6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.

"14. I feel that you cannot trust a person who is homosexual." Of course you cant trust them, they are servants of Satan, because you serve Satan when you sin. And Satan is the greatest liar.

"12. Homosexuality is immoral." Duh now, our Lord gave us rules, and to not be gay is one of them. It's an abomination.
"8. Marriage between homosexual individuals is acceptable." Of course not, marriage is between man and woman. What do they want? Between man and dogs?
I'll add more in a few minutes, computer dying.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 01:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chud
Homosexuality isn't a mental illness, gay people aren't 'sick', they were just born finding the same sex attrative. I certaintly would never sleep with someone of the same sex, but I can accept why gay people do. They don't deserved to be locked up as you suggest.



Wow - saying stuff like that is about as bad as being gay, you know! You should really be careful - and they are sick. It's a choice, not an illness. YOU CHOOSE TO GO TO HELL! you are not born to go there. satan is condemning, he may tell you people were born to be gay and go to hell, but it isnt true. he is a liar. They want sick pleasure, and do not care that they will go to hell. Actions have consequences.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 08:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Trustnone
Ok, First off i am a religous person so i believe that homosexuality is an ambomination


An Abomination:
The texts in Leviticus call it an "abomination" for a man to lie with a man as with a woman. The word in Hebrew means "to become unclean"........ It referred to a violation of the purity rules that governed Israelite society and kept the Israelites different from the other people.
Many things were believed to make one unclean........ eating the wrong animals, sowing mixed fields, menstration, attending to a burial, giving birth; all made a person unclean for a certain period of time. Specifically, look at other statements in the same passage as the one concerning homogenitality:
Leviticus 11 speaks of regulations regarding clean and unclean food....... that we must not eat of anything that does not have a split hoof, or anything without fins or scales in the water, or specific kinds of birds, or any flying insects that walk on all fours........ Leviticus 12 speaks of women being ceremonially unclean for seven days following childbirth, and must wait 33 days, unless she has a daughter, then must wait 66 days to be purified from her bleeding and then must bring a sin offering and be cleansed before being allowed to worship.
Leviticus 13 speaks very specifically about people with any skin diseases being unclean... (45 verses worth...)
vs. 47-59 cover regulations about mildew...
Leviticus 14:1-32 cover cleansing from infectious skin diseases...
vs. 33-57 again discuss regulations concerning mildew...
vs 15:1-33 again talks about discharges causing uncleanliness...
Leviticus 19:19: "do not plant your field with two kinds of seed, do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material."
Leviticus 19:27: "do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard"
Leviticus 20:27: "a man or woman who is a medium or spiritualist among you must be put to death. You are to stone them"

All these things were obviously important for the Israelites in their day, or else so much time wouldn't have been spent detailing all of this. Does God mean for us to do these things today? They are obviously given much more time than any mention of homogenitality. These items had more to do with customs and culture at that time, not of moral judgment.

In these texts, the Hebrew word used to describe these behaviors or "abominations" is TOEVAH. This word literally means "culturally forbidden". These behaviors were forbidden because of their cultural and religious implications, not because of morality concerns. The word that was not intentionally not used was ZIMAH, which would have meant it was wrong in itself. When translated into Greek, the word BDELYGMA was used.. which means ritual impurity, and not the word ANOMIA, which would have meant a violation of the law or a wrong or a sin. The author was obviously meaning something different than what many Christians try to make them mean today.

Leviticus 20:13
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them."
This verse in Leviticus prescribed the death penalty for this behavior. It really is severe........ But Leviticus also prescribes the same penalty for cursing one's parents....... Other sexual sins also merited the death penalty: adultery, incest and bestiality. The law in Leviticus considered all these crimes to be very serious -- but for different reasons. Cursing one's parents, for example, was a major crime against society. Israelite society of the time was built around the extended family and the operation of the whole family depended on obedience within the family hierarchy. So, to oppose one's parents was to threaten social disorder. As far as adultery, in that society the woman was the man's property, and sex outside of the marriage was also a financial loss for the man....... theft. The wives were bought with a "brides price". It was important that any children born were legitimate heirs.

As far as the reference to homogenital acts, it had a much different meaning then than it is today. Among the early Israelites, to engage in homogenital sex meant to b e like the Gentiles, to identify with the non-Jews. That is to say, to engage in homogenital acts was to betray the Jewish religion....... Leviticus condemned homogenital sex as a religious crime of idolatry, not as a sexual offense, and that religious treason was thought serious enough to merit death. Leviticus condemned homogenital acts as a religious crime of idolatry, not as a sexual offense.

So again I have to ask, why is it that some Christians "always" just pick out the homosexual part of this script? Because they are homophobic and hate filled towards someone different than themselves, because of fear and ignorance. I can not in any way see that it truly has anything what-so-ever to do with "god" ....when there are other things listed considered just as much an "abomination" that they never speak of...

Again. Mind your own buisness and stay out of other peoples bedrooms
Worry about your own sins.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 09:01 AM
link   
MEIN GOTT!!
I got a rating of 62 on the test! I must be some Jack the ripper of gays!

Watch out 'gays' Jonnie is comming to town!

Seriously though, why should we consider them to be normal? They haven't harmed me- that is correct, so I don't hate them but they harm my society, that harms me, it harms the morality of my neighborhood why should I or my society see them as NORMAL, why should we encourage this to continue?
Give me one good reason??

Even if like me you are not religious, why should I see them as anything but a deviant social sect ? All the gays can give me is even nature has its gays but that’s like saying even animals get sick? No, I don't think it’s a sickness but just like cannibals it’s a deviant sect of society, as always the majority is normal.
If I were to be put on some planet of gays then I would readily say ' hey I'm weird, I like the opposite sex- I can either choose to follow the others or practice celibacy’. Why can't gays be like that!?
What do they achieve by being gay? They can't start a family, they can't have kids, everyone scorns them upon. What’s the point of their 'right to sin'?
Ok, militant anti-deviant voice is signing off now.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 09:19 AM
link   
Get a clue...

I will repost for you since you seem to miss the message in favor of your own emotions.

Lady V....we are not under the Olde Testament Law concerning all those stonings and such that you quote. However ..I will give you this..from the Olde and New Testaments. No where in the Olde or New Testaments does the Word ever instruct one to glorify sexuality. No where do you find this as a instruction to believers. However if you read carefully as to what the pagans and the Hebrews where doing ..when they secretly converted to paganism and practiced the rites on the groves and high places in the daytime and the valleys at nignt...they were practicing the sexual rites of the ancients and defining themselves by sexuality....including the sacrafices required by these foreign religions. Exactly what is being brought back today.

As for minding ones own buisnes...I would like to but I am constantly bombarded by this topic ..either by the media, educators, politicians , or other pimps trying to push a postion while telling others to mind thier own buisness..and let these people play through while pushing their buisness on others....publically.

I do not define myself by my sexual orientation .and think to do so..is uncouth , crass and unintelligent. I am not intrested in someones sexuality ..no matter what their orientation. I am intrested in their brain power ..not their emotional or glandular power passing itself off as brain power. Understand the difference????

One has to go to school to get so dumb that they publically try to pass off any type of sexuality as a badge of greatness and to play through like a default. Ordinary people are not this dumb. You have to go to school to get educated so as to think your sexual orientation is the total mark of who and what you are...and that once again this entitles you to play through. Ordinary thinking people are not this dumb. Yet here we have this one group among us who do exactly this...define who and what they are soley by their sexual orientation..and almost no one thinks this is unusual????

Check the prohibitions and instructions of the hebrews .in olde testament times ...no where does it instruct them to define themselves by this standard or to self glorify as did the heathens who surrounded them. Same with the new testament ..a concept you seem to have avoided in your postings in lieu of "tolerance".
I am not against sexuality..I am against dumbness and ignorance. It is nothing to glorify. You should know better ..especially if you know so much history?bible.

Thanks
Orangetom



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Those christians of whom you speak..have a core doctrine by which many live. "come out from amongst them and be ye seperate and touch not the unclean thing" For those who know the implications of what this means it is very telling. By its very doctrine Christianity is anti social.
Christians are a sect...meaning seperated from. They do not take on the appearence and manner of the world or the latest fad to come down the pipe..no matter how expedient it seems to be.

The doctrine of this world ..which is in direct opposition... is not to allow Christians the ability to sepertate..and to label them for wanting to seperate from this or any other worldlly value which is being forced upon them. This is not tolerance on the part of the world system ...it is intolerance. One has to be educated not to catch on to it.

Thanks Orangetom



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 09:40 AM
link   
I got a 30, answering perfectly honestly.

A couple of questions on the test seemed slanted to me though, and may have influenced the score lower because of my answer, even though it has nothing to do with my feelings towards gay people.



Gay people deserve what they get.


I said "Strongly Agree" because I think everyone deserves what they get, not just gay people. But that includes gays, which affects the question.



Organizations which promote gay rights are not necessary.


I said "Strongly Agree" because I don't believe in Special Rights. I believe in Human Rights, which includes gays, and thusly, affects the question.



I have damaged property of a gay person, such as "keying" their car.


Thankfully, I haven't, but since I've had close friends that were gay, and accidents do happen, what would it mean if I'd accidentally fallen and broken their coffee table, or dropped a glass and broke it? Would that make me more homophobic, or just clumsy? I think there needs to be an "intentionally" inserted in this question.


Anyway, interesting test, nice to know that even answering honestly, it doesn't make me out to be something I'm not.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 10:44 AM
link   
Gays and lesbians are always bent on making their preferred sexual lifestyles acceptable and tolerable in the public society with their annual parades, media bombarding and advertising of erotically stimulated or sexually suggested images (ad of man showing underwear with a certain bulge; a pair of women standing in lingerie closely to each other, etc.), words of mouth, TV/film portrayals and shows of how wonderful and hip it is to be gay/lesbian, the explosion of the Internet porn, the exploitation of people by free porn images of gay/lesbian sex and so on.

That's what gay/lesbian lifestyle activists and supporters have been doing to RAM down on our eyes, ears, mouths and minds for the past 3-4 decades, the last two being very aggressive, in spite of AIDS and safe sex education.

Straight/heterosexual people never make a point of ramming down heterosexual lifestyle with all aspects of it on all people. Instead they just let people make their own discovery of sexuality on their own, privately.

Gays/lesbians, on the other hand, wanted to PUBLICIZE their sexual lifestyles and make it ACCEPTABLE in the society. That mean three things:
1 - no procreation, no kids.
2 - depopulate the society
3 - make same sex recreation fun.

[edit on 4/23/2005 by the_oleneo]



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 04:04 PM
link   
When one breaks into the alchemical code used by our illuminated rulers, one learns that homosexuality is an exceedingly complex issue with these people, who have a very detailed, systematic understanding of the issue. This understanding is not only psychological, but also primordial analogy based. These are just some of the things one discovers studying their perspective on the issue:

Bi-sexuality is considered a Capricorn class analogy, along with other similarly classed analogies like battery charge, sex-energy-charge, vortex center, imprisonment, radioactive material, feces, drugs, explosives, metal (especially lead), poison, erection, insanity, confusion, "burlesque," peak-state-energy, catalyst (along with Leo and Virgo), Princess (along with Leo and Virgo), Air element (along with Leo and Virgo), fat, armor, tough, weapon, shield, gun, gladiator, prostitute, depression (which induces rage or oranur reaction), cloven hoof, The Devil (tarot), ten or seven (decimal assignment for Capricorn), weight (as in "heavy metal" or bullet), dying, putrefication or putrefaction, fermentation, alcohol and alchoholism, drunk, baloon, ego-inflation, tower, wall, counter cathexis and related complex, abortive, lazy, puss, venom, excited sperm, pimple, pornography, masturbation (powerful third eye activation and use can sublimate unused sexual energy), S&M, hero (at least early in the story, befor he or she gains some manner of bearing), deadly orgone, vampire, werewolf, psychopath, cavalry, pirate, addiction, molestation, seduction, scapegoat, just-awakened or "reborn."

They handle the issue of homosexual inclination the same way most people handle the issue of fat, or explosives. One who is wise keeps the fat trimmed down, and in this dangerous "fast food" world, this is accomplished by avoiding homosexual behavior (outside astral vampirism in their book) all together. They can also use homosexual inclination as a weapon via astral vampirism, where the "venom or explosive material" is passed on to the sleeping victim, who must then "burn that fat," or "decommission that bomb" over the long haul.

These people value core heterosexuality as the sexuality of depth, power, and long-term survivability, for homosexuality is the dying (or maybe just awakening) form of sexual nature, associated with sexual degradation. Any power possessed by bi-sexual lifestyle possesses an oranur reactive nature at best, which is attractive in the same manner as candy, but does not nourish. They know all people are at least somewhat homosexually inclined, but also know it is unwise to make onself more so inclined, so a few homsexual encounters are not the end of the world. Capricorn class nature is kept in careful check in a healthy "mixing bowl." It has its place in nature, but its place is carefully controlled (complex issue in such a confused world, and the related lessons tend to come late in life).

People with strong homosexual inclinations are used as weapons by these people, and this is one way prospective illuminated network people are made balanced, for healthy human sexuality is a matter of natural balance, and it is balanced human nature which attracts strong illumination about itself. Sexually balanced people have "genuinely magnetic personality," etc.... Venus is core-heterosexual.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 06:37 PM
link   
orangetom1999

Bull! This is sad!
Most often feelings of hate are based on ignorance, misunderstanding, and fear of the unknown....many men that are insecure hate gays.......Your also bombarded with plenty of other things too, but do you make a big deal hatred out of it? No I'd bet you don't! So what...who cares if they want rights "like everyone else"? why shouldn't they? Get a clue dearie...paople are people regardless of their color, race or sexual preference and they deserved equal rights...so you don't like it...waaaaaaa



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 07:30 PM
link   
my score was 21....I dont like the thought of the act but what one person find unpleasent the other finds it pleasent if it how they feel then it all right with me why should some one be treated any differently for there sexual orientation.

It just like black/white sexest and all the other problems our culture need to sort out....

For anyone that saying that the penis is for the vagina since you are making that statment i hope you have never experimented with what homosexual males would do......As that is not what the penis is intended for it just for the vagina remember


There are some real anti everything in this forum.....ok to deny ignorance....but you should deny racism, sexual orientation, sexist and anti religious abuse....Learn to respect each other.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 07:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by the_oleneo
Gays and lesbians are always bent


Yep...no news there



Straight/heterosexual people never make a point of ramming down heterosexual lifestyle with all aspects of it on all people.


It always happens, you just don't notice it.


Gays/lesbians, on the other hand, wanted to PUBLICIZE their sexual lifestyles and make it ACCEPTABLE in the society.


Why not publicize it? Why not make it acceptable to the masses. Any minority group that recieves an unfair deal from the rest of society wants equality..........Next you'll be telling me that women want to vote.


Scored a 22 btw.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 07:56 PM
link   


Next you'll be telling me that women want to vote.



They want to do what now? Bah! Never!

I heard that women go mad if they spend longer than 5 minutes on the phone. Their brains can't cope with a disembodied voice apparently....



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 08:01 PM
link   
Yes, I'd heard that aswell so it must be true.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Homosexuality isn't the same thing as "race" or gender. People are justified in wanting to keep homosexuality away from their children by virtue of the fact that it is not a natural life-style and it is more of a psychological disposition which should be tolerated differently than people's more natural characteristics. Teaching children that homosexuality is even remotely sensible is ridiculous. Teaching kids that homosexuality is a form of sexual derangement is not the same idea as teaching kids that skin color defines a person's value. Teaching should be truthful rather than politically correct. What a person does, a person becomes, and homosexuals are caught up in living an unfulfilling life-style which is really more of an addiction than a life-style. You might as well teach school children that medical grade opiates won't harm you.

Of course I don't believe in denying people housing or employment based on sexual preferance. Nor do I believe in directing violence and harassment at people who have made unfortunate life-style choices. I know that nature has a way of working itself out over time. No one is perfect by a longshot.

[edit on 23-4-2005 by Scorpio Shaping Flow]



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 08:38 PM
link   
24 - Your score rates you as "high-grade non-homophobic.

yet i dont support gay marriage.

i think homosexuality is immoral and a sin.

so ha! to all the people who have said im a judgemental and a bigot and such for these beliefs.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join