Russian vs. USA Tech

Originally posted by jetsetter
OK but no more comparing the T-72 to the M-1. The T-72 was never ment to be a front line tanks. It was men to be cheap and a tank for behind the front lines.

Originally posted by jetsetter
It was never actually designed to take on the latest western tanks though. Usually T-80s and T-64s were deployed on the front lines.

Originally posted by bisonn
T-80U in Chechnya just happened to survive 18(!) RPG hits.

Oh yeah it has 1100mm of frontal armor vs abrams 800mm!

Originally posted by jetsetter
It was never actually designed to take on the latest western tanks though. Usually T-80s and T-64s were deployed on the front lines.

Originally posted by Seekerof


Yes bisonn, impressive to say the least huh?
Imagine those M1A1's and a few M1A2's, that are roughly 20 years old, taking up to 14+ hits from those Iraqi Russian made T-72's and T-80's and still destroying them!
I bet those guys in the First Gulf War were laughing there butts off, eh?!
Btw....is that 1100 Russian armor the same as Chobham spaced armor? Think not!
Obviously not...thats why Russian tanks are equipped with Kornet and the other BS to help it absorb damage and not be destroyed. Imagine Chobham with plated reactive armor.......




regards
seekerof

The Peacekeeper missile is America's newest intercontinental ballistic missile. Its deployment fulfilled a key goal of the strategic modernization program and increased strength and credibility to the ground-based leg of the U.S. strategic triad. With the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has begun to revise its strategic policy and has agreed to eliminate the multiple re-entry vehicle Peacekeeper ICBMs by the year 2003 as part of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II. The Peacekeeper is capable of delivering 10 independently targeted warheads with greater accuracy than any other ballistic missile. It is a three-stage rocket ICBM system consisting of three major sections: the boost system, the post-boost vehicle system and the re-entry system.

Originally posted by hoochymama
RUSSIAN

I would like you to respond rationally to the below comments:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Russian

Gross Domestic Production (GDP)
USA-GDP $10.4 Trillion (2002 est.)
Rossiyskaya Federatsiya - $1.35 trillion (2002 est)
most of these money are used to build war products!

actually your quite right. In keeping with their former Soviet habits the Russian Federation spends 40% of their GDP on their military. May explain why their economy is in the loo. If you have enough cash you can buy a Kilo (the sub not the narcotic, oops you can get that too.) The US spends something to the neighborhood of 4-5% of their GDP on military spending.
Either way you paint it its bad for the Russian Federation.

Electrical production
USA- 3.719 trillion kWh (2001)
Russia- 846.5 billion kWh (2001)
doest look like it
look at the east coast black out!

You wanted facts. You contradict your own requests with banal comments like that. If you are the Master of All (or so you signature says) you're not a very disciplined one if you can't even obey yourself.

Electrical consumption
USA-3.479 trillion kWh (2001)
Russia-773.08 billion kWh (2001)
less people are in Russia

Again you're right. The population of the USA is about 290 million to Russia's 145 million. So what you're saying is that Russia with about half the population needs less than a fourth of the electricity. Mighty industrial complex there Russian...check your math, it looks bad tovarish...

Exports
USA - $687 billion (2002)
Russia-104.6 billion (2002)
most of these are war products

Again, you are correct. Military exports make up 20% of the Russian exports. where they make up about 3% of US exports. As you've demonstrated your math is as good as mine, so for illustrations sake we'll punch the numbers. USA 3% of 687 Billion is 20.61 Billion Russia 20% of 104.6 billion is 20.92 Billion. Yes, indeed you are correct.

Imports
USA - $1.165 trillion (2002)
Russia - $60.7 billion (2002)
who needs to import things when they could make them?!

You truly missed the point on this one, ...pass me another nesting doll Russian.

Communications:
telephones (mainlines)
USA - 194 million (1997)
Russia - 30 million (1998)
less people and people are not to lazy to go across the street and talk to their neighbors instead of calling

This is truly pathetic. Nest thing you're going to tell me is that Opie and Aunt Bea are making apple pie in the kitchen.

cellular phones
USA - 69.209 million (1998)
Russia - 19 million (2003)
does every kid need a cellphone?!

no but every scientist, business man does.

ISP's
USA- 7000 (2002)
Russia - 300 (2002)
what ever that means!

That statement speaks volumes unto itself. Russian my friend, without a Internet Service Provider this little discussion wouldn't be possible.

Internet Users
USA - 165.75 million (2002)
Russia - 18 million (2002)
to much male bovine shyte in the newspaper so they just read the paper!

sad. truly sad. Just the facts Russian, sound familiar?
Russian, if you're going to draw a line in the sand and then ignore it, it shows allot about your true intent.

hrxll
[/QUOTE]

I specifically want you to respond to the fact regarding Russia spending 40% of there GDP on there Military. What would be your response to that??

If you agree that this figure is way out of control, how to you justify your opinion that Russia should be a Military Power on the USA's scale?? I dont see how you can.

See, what your country should do is get out of the Military business and get in to the “Fixing your Country” business.

Originally posted by Seekerof
Whats that Russian?
Thats just some lame bullcrap information you got......like you tell everyone else when they provide their information.......

And you said what? "so stick it up!..."
You mean like them M1A1 amd M1A2's virtually do everytime to Russian made tanks?!



regards
seekerof

[Edited on 1-12-2003 by Seekerof]

Originally posted by jetsetter
OK but no more comparing the T-72 to the M-1. The T-72 was never ment to be a front line tanks. It was men to be cheap and a tank for behind the front lines.

Originally posted by FULCRUM


One thing that really stands out for the Russian equipment:

All have this:

Operating temperature range, Celsius from -40 to +40 or better yet: From -50 to +50!!!



There arent many if not any US systems that can manage to do this!

Originally posted by Seekerof

Ummm, now you want to assert that Iraqi tanks are "foreign" to these weapons discussions and yet Fulcrum can say that the US blackhawk was designed by a Russian....a "foreigner"...who also happens to be a US citizen...........THEN I can get my butt chomped for asserting such and then you want to argue that Iraqi tanks, that were made and bought in Russia, are "FOREIGN"! Good grief............You guys want to discuss "Tech" and yet set your own rules in discussing it!



regards
seekerof