Originally posted by Maverick
ok , thought so.. hard to tell through text >.<

yeah i should have put up a or or

maybe that would help.

we can forgive Maverick cause he is a noob.

also i dont take offense in stupid stuff like that!

As most of you are probebly aware. Russia is very cold so for a country such as USA to invade Russia their soldiers wouldnt be as compatent in the conditions as Russian troops.

Because of these reasons, I think Russia's infantry is tougher it doesnt have the level of comfort that G.I.'s have and they train in trecharous conditions.

America would also be an extremely difficult country to attack. Id say in the present, its impossible.

Originally posted by UndergroundNetwork
As most of you are probebly aware. Russia is very cold so for a country such as USA to invade Russia their soldiers wouldnt be as compatent in the conditions as Russian troops.

Because of these reasons, I think Russia's infantry is tougher it doesnt have the level of comfort that G.I.'s have and they train in trecharous conditions.

America would also be an extremely difficult country to attack. Id say in the present, its impossible.

I agree both countries wuold be hard to attack.

Even the history tells that NODOBY(after Russia was established) were able to beat Russia.

Germany and Napolean both tryed to attack Russia and ALMOST succeded!

Originally posted by Russian

Originally posted by UndergroundNetwork
As most of you are probebly aware. Russia is very cold so for a country such as USA to invade Russia their soldiers wouldnt be as compatent in the conditions as Russian troops.

Because of these reasons, I think Russia's infantry is tougher it doesnt have the level of comfort that G.I.'s have and they train in trecharous conditions.

America would also be an extremely difficult country to attack. Id say in the present, its impossible.

I agree both countries wuold be hard to attack.

Even the history tells that NODOBY(after Russia was established) were able to beat Russia.

Germany and Napolean both tryed to attack Russia and ALMOST succeded!

Yep, everytime ive been to Russia, the person i was visiting had to take me to that monument where the germans stopped 50(?) miles from Moscow

Originally posted by Maverick

Originally posted by Russian


I agree both countries wuold be hard to attack.

Even the history tells that NODOBY(after Russia was established) were able to beat Russia.

Germany and Napolean both tryed to attack Russia and ALMOST succeded!

Yep, everytime ive been to Russia, the person i was visiting had to take me to that monument where the germans stopped 50(?) miles from Moscow

You been to Russia?

OMG a Russian Tech Hater GOING TO RUSSIA!

YOU WILL GET KILLED THERE!

Alright, Seekerof:
THIS THREAD IS NOT FOR DISCUSSING TRAINING, WHAT GOOD THE TECHNOLOGY WOULD DO YOU, OR WHO WOULD WIN IN A WAR. RUSSIAN VS USA TECH(NOLOGY), CAN YOU READ THE THREAD TITLE?

THE T-80U DOES NOT PHYSICALLY HAVE 1100MM OF ARMOR, THE ABRAMS DOES NOT PHYSICALLY HAVE 800MM OF ARMOR! IT'S 1100/800MM OF RHA, WHICH IS HOW THICK IT WOULD BE IF IT WERE A BIG STEEL BLOCK! BTW, ERA gives more protection per weight than your chobham, and isnt penetrated by 40 year old RPG's!

Did anyone else notice that the Americans are so thrilled at not getting their asses kicked in Iraq for the first time in months that they have the same "54 Iraqis killed" headline day after day?

[Edited on 17-10-1983 by bisonn]

Originally posted by Russian

Originally posted by Maverick

Originally posted by Russian


I agree both countries wuold be hard to attack.

Even the history tells that NODOBY(after Russia was established) were able to beat Russia.

Germany and Napolean both tryed to attack Russia and ALMOST succeded!

Yep, everytime ive been to Russia, the person i was visiting had to take me to that monument where the germans stopped 50(?) miles from Moscow

You been to Russia?

OMG a Russian Tech Hater GOING TO RUSSIA!

YOU WILL GET KILLED THERE!

HAHAHAHA Im not a Russian tech hater. I just said we have more money.

The germans beat russia in WW1, you forgot that.

Originally posted by bisonn
The germans beat russia in WW1, you forgot that.

He means no one has taken the Russian homeland.

Originally posted by Maverick

Originally posted by bisonn
The germans beat russia in WW1, you forgot that.

He means no one has taken the Russian homeland.

They only took Finland, Ukraine, and the Baltic States.

Before and since, anyone who invaded russia got their ass kicked!

Originally posted by bisonn

They only took Finland, Ukraine, and the Baltic States.

Before and since, anyone who invaded russia got their ass kicked!

For example look at Napoloen.

He came in with 400,000 troops!

And ran out barely alive with 9,000! troops!

Originally posted by Russian

Originally posted by bisonn

They only took Finland, Ukraine, and the Baltic States.

Before and since, anyone who invaded russia got their ass kicked!

For example look at Napoloen.

He came in with 400,000 troops!

And ran out barely alive with 9,000! troops!

Finland liberated itself all alone..

There was only one German division here during ww1 that landed in Hanko and marched to Helsinki..

(One 40km road trip.. thats about it..)

Without much of a fight..

Posted by: hoochymama
Having GOOD TECH and BIGGEST MILITARY ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS!

Now, if you are referring that the U.S. has the BIGGEST military..lol..you need to get your facts straight. The U.S. has one of the smallest militaries for the power that it has. It has, if I am not mistaken, 500,000 active duty right?

China - Over 1 million lol.

Definately not the BIGGEST, just one of the most powerful

-wD

[Edited on 2-12-2003 by WeBDeviL]

NUMBER MORE THAN 2 MILLION!!!



US has its 'power' trough QUANTITY, not by QUALITY..



Webdevil, go to some dark corner of the ATS and shame..

For speaking things that arent true..



And this 2 million inludes active duty only..

Not reserves and not national guard..

it includes US Armed forces only.. (USAF, USN, ARMY and USMC..)



[Edited on 2-12-2003 by FULCRUM]