posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 02:02 PM
Well, you're going to see Manning vs. Brady again. And I may be in about a .01% minority on this subject, but I think Brady's the better QB.
However, Manning has the better offense, for sure, and it really showed when they played earlier this year on M.N.F.
Since New England is NOT going to win 59-54, here is my question: Is there good reason to believe that, still lacking Rodney Harrison, New England
can defend far better than they did in their dreadful performance on M.N.F. several months ago?
As I've said, I'm not a football genius, don't get the X's and O's like some of y'all do, etc. So please tell me:
Given that this game will be in the dome at Indi, WHY SHOULD I RATIONALLY HOPE FOR A BIG IMPROVEMENT FROM THE PATS' DEFENSE?
I really want to expect a big improvement, you know.... And I have virtually unlimited faith in Belichik's coaching abilities.