It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Baseball: Should be hall of famers?

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 01:59 PM
link   
ray schalk sucks in every aspect




posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 02:39 PM
link   
and no he doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame even if he WAS a catcher, he still wasn't even as close to being as good as other catchers in the Hall of Fame such as Mickey (Gordan) Cochrane.



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 02:40 PM
link   
In a hundred years, there will be so many people in the hall itll be a house, what will they do by then?



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 02:41 PM
link   
good question. Probably build a second or stop inducting 2 people every year.



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 03:10 PM
link   
maybe they can eliminate the stupid ones like morgan bulkelely



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Who's also the answer to my civil war question that like no one has answered yet.



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 05:46 PM
link   
you basically gave it away o yea and get rid of travis jackson and ray schalk



posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 06:32 PM
link   
Rose and Jackson...just not fair, you idiot commisioner



posted on Sep, 17 2005 @ 07:52 AM
link   
i want to c gwynn and ripken go in non steroids users maybe the last



posted on Sep, 17 2005 @ 09:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by EnosSlaughter
i want to c gwynn and ripken go in non steroids users maybe the last

i agree, i too would enjoy seering gywnn and ripken in 1st ballot



posted on Sep, 17 2005 @ 11:27 AM
link   
2 players with 3000 hits great defensive players, and classy players



posted on Sep, 17 2005 @ 09:18 PM
link   
i always think that gwynn, boggs, and ripken were the same person cuz theyre so similar



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 08:38 AM
link   
Oh yea their really similer



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 01:09 PM
link   
If Bonds, Raffy, McGuire, Sosa or any of these dopeheads get in, Then their is no possible way Pete rose should be kept out. Atleast he admitted to what he did.
The hall shouldn't just be about all stats, Gutsy performances have to stand for something as well. Curt Shilling's numbers are mediocre when you think of the hall, but his performances in the Series with the D-Backs and especially the red sox (Bloody sock) Have to give him an extra look. :party-smiley-018:



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Pete Rose is a completely differen't situation. There was no rule that steroids are an automatic ban from baseball. When Rose gambled, the rule was that if you ban, you're out, no matter what. Just because maybe taking steroids is worse than gambling on baseball, it doesn't mean that they can change the rules. It is what it is.



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:12 PM
link   
gambling is still a stoopid ru.e



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:13 PM
link   
That may be but that has always been the rule and Rose broke it.



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:13 PM
link   
You can't go against a rule even if it's stupid.



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:15 PM
link   
But they should make an exception, hes the alltime hits leader, and he gambled when he was a manager anyway



posted on Sep, 18 2005 @ 03:16 PM
link   
There are no exception to the rules. If there were that wouldn't be fare. Just because he's the hit leader doesn't mean he's an exception. He went against the rule.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join