It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Baseball: OPINION

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2005 @ 11:01 PM
link   
who would you rather have on your team Stan Musial or Albert Pujols?




posted on Sep, 10 2005 @ 11:04 PM
link   
I'd take Pujols. You can only continue to get better through the years. And what he's done in just 4 years is unbelievable already.



posted on Sep, 10 2005 @ 11:07 PM
link   
hes more versitile too, can play pretty much anywhere you put him



posted on Sep, 10 2005 @ 11:13 PM
link   
yeah i also think Pujols will easily surpass Musial's 475 lifetime homeruns but not musials 330+ lifetime BA



posted on Sep, 11 2005 @ 07:54 PM
link   
Pujols, hands down... if Pujols doesnt get 600+ homeruns then he will be a disappointment at this point, and the 330+ batting average, that could be passed by Pujols also, We all seem to forget that this guy isnt even in his prime yet...



posted on Sep, 13 2005 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I too believe that a team would rather have a Albert Pujols than a Stan Musial. Pujols has produced numbers in 4 years that have surpaced nearly (if not all) every hall of famers numbers at this time in their careers. Stan Musial was a great player and very similer to Albert Pujols in many repects. He hit for power (475 homers) and average (.331). But Albert has one thing on his side, and that is youth. Albert can only get better, and when he does, what kind of numbers do you think he could produce when he does?



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join