Originally posted by Seekerof


If I may voice a possible concern though?
In partaking in a research project, its obvious that objectives are met and adhered to and this, I know the research project will do. But, in doing so, in keeping with the concept of "research project", there is a difference. The difference is that in the keeping of what a true "research project" is and does and its true purpose and intentions, that all information be presented, just not information from one side.
I am not aware of the objectives set for this project, but a few questions do come to mind: Is this going to be a true, factual, unbiased research, with information presented from all sides and sources or is this mainly going to be a database for housing information strictly adhering to the "conspiracy" issues of 9/11? In other words, a biased or slanted research project?


[Edited on 27-11-2003 by Seekerof]

Originally posted by ADVISOR
If I may make one suggestion.

A project of this kind is going to go in m a n y, different directions. Any project will do that really, however as it has been nearly three years since the event in question. Be extra careful not to be distracted by white rabbits, ie false leads. Material evidence is going to be the only thing people will believe and even then...they may still choose not to.

Let me know when you and those involved are ready, no rush, just letting you know I am behind you all.

Originally posted by BeingWatchedByThem
may i suggest that you look into something,

they say the statue of liberty was closed after the attacks of september 11th. But was it even opened for that day?

was it closed, before the WTC attacks?

they say, after the WTC attacks they closed the island, but was the statue tours even open that day?