his party'll break up at the crack of dawn....
at the crack of dawn will he understand that his interferance has caused too much grief..once and for all
we are nearing the age of annihilative destruction, any closer and we'll start singing "roll the matresses".
colonel....your attitude's a little fake this time round, no offence, it's just, you've made yourself too obvious
you dont really care if bush is a bushman or not, you're arguing pointlessly with virtually no cause.
you dont really care about the monarchy, and that's where we strongly disagree.
my great grandmother was a countess...does that define matters'?
i do however, dislike bush intensely for his rubish ways...i dislike the ease with which he is manipulated.
i'm sure he will be voted for again, and again, untill some1 getz off their ass, forms an opposing movement & defeats this lout in his own
barrack.
lives might be lost, but i see this as the only possible way to go about it.
picture: "a skinny pale guy with a goatie, a tendency to wear a black cape anywhere he goes', at 16 a raging new-generation teenager intent on
proving logic shall always have a superior stance to age"<
i think you're wrong picking this argument, there are numerous "other" ways of proving the man's a lout.
Strictly speaking he might have not payed enough attention to what was happening around him....being totally honest about this, if i had 5000 men
looking after my ass day&night having just flown for 11 hours' in a row i wouldn't pay too much attention either, neither would you.
it's always easy to critisize/compromise a leader's position....despite the possibility that he might have been through a difficult time.
all i have to say on the matter for now....is...: a more inteligent life-form would have been more appropriate to represent the world's strongest
country
PeaCE
cYRUS
[Edited on 25-11-2003 by Cyrus]