Bush wrecks Queen's Palace Garden, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-11-2003 @ 09:07 PM by Colonel
Originally posted by Dreamstone
How did Bush act like an ass again? I missed that part. I thought the issue was the helicopter. It seems that our POTUS has only to exist and he is promptly attcked. Kind of sad that you guys have so few other issues that you can only jump on that.

But then again, Colonel has never been noted for his willingness to keep a topic from degenerating into random crap.

Nice going *mod*


Look, ass, you're little sideway disses don't contribute # and so far, the only thing your being known for now is being one of my little groupie bitches that diss my forum but just "happen" to show up everytime I post in it.

Now, to your point: Bush acted like an ass:

1) Two jumbo jets, two liveried presidential helicopters, four more US Navy helicopters, a motorcade of limousines, 200 US secret service agents and 1300 English police were required to unite Mr Bush safely with his fish and mushy peas. Total cost? £1 million ($2.3 million).

Not all heads of state choose to travel in such style.
www.smh.com.au...

2) The issue of immunity is one of a series of extraordinary US demands turned down by Ministers and Downing Street during preparations for the Bush visit. These included the closure of the Tube network, the use of US air force planes and helicopters and the shipping in of battlefield weaponry to use against rioters.

3) Demands for the US air force to patrol above London with fighter aircraft and Black Hawk helicopters have also been turned down.

4) The Americans had also wanted to travel with a piece of military hardware called a 'mini-gun', which usually forms part of the mobile armoury in the presidential cavalcade. It is fired from a tank and can kill dozens of people.

5) Home Secretary David Blunkett has refused to grant diplomatic immunity to armed American special agents and snipers travelling to Britain as part of President Bush's entourage this week.

observer.guardian.co.uk...


reply posted on 25-11-2003 @ 01:22 AM by Cyrus
his party'll break up at the crack of dawn....
at the crack of dawn will he understand that his interferance has caused too much grief..once and for all
we are nearing the age of annihilative destruction, any closer and we'll start singing "roll the matresses".
colonel....your attitude's a little fake this time round, no offence, it's just, you've made yourself too obvious
you dont really care if bush is a bushman or not, you're arguing pointlessly with virtually no cause.
you dont really care about the monarchy, and that's where we strongly disagree.
my great grandmother was a countess...does that define matters'?
i do however, dislike bush intensely for his rubish ways...i dislike the ease with which he is manipulated.
i'm sure he will be voted for again, and again, untill some1 getz off their ass, forms an opposing movement & defeats this lout in his own barrack.
lives might be lost, but i see this as the only possible way to go about it.
picture: "a skinny pale guy with a goatie, a tendency to wear a black cape anywhere he goes', at 16 a raging new-generation teenager intent on proving logic shall always have a superior stance to age"<

i think you're wrong picking this argument, there are numerous "other" ways of proving the man's a lout.
Strictly speaking he might have not payed enough attention to what was happening around him....being totally honest about this, if i had 5000 men looking after my ass day&night having just flown for 11 hours' in a row i wouldn't pay too much attention either, neither would you.
it's always easy to critisize/compromise a leader's position....despite the possibility that he might have been through a difficult time.
all i have to say on the matter for now....is...: a more inteligent life-form would have been more appropriate to represent the world's strongest country
PeaCE
cYRUS


[Edited on 25-11-2003 by Cyrus]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 17 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags