It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 1976, chief of the astronaut office Deke Slayton claimed that "I don't recall any of our astronauts ever reporting UFOs."
NASA claims that all photos, all voice transcripts, all debriefings are in the public domain and are available to the news media. ...
...Who has taken the trouble to check out this material ? Well, James Oberg has, for example. Alan Sandler did. Dr Hynek visited the Houston space center in July 1976 and was shown the material in question. NASA's original story, surprising, has been
...From internal evidence alone, it looks more and more like a crude hoax. This can be deduced from the vocabulary itself.
"Mission Control, this is Mission Control..." this was NEVER a phrase used by NASA, which instead always referred to "Houston".
Technical-sounding gibberish such a "field-distortion", "orbit scanned", "625 to the fifth", "auto-relays", etc. were never found in real transcripts.
"Repeat, repeat..." is never used on the radio; instead astronauts and Mission Control use the phrase "Say Again".
In addition, interviews with the handful of amateur radio listeners who are known to have tuned in to the S-Band (2270 megahertz) moon signals produced testimony that they heard the same conversations which were released by NASA. Since listening to the m
...The unavoidable conclusion is that the "Pepper Transcript" was either fabricated or that Pepper used very poor judgement in allowing himself to be victimized by somebody else's fake.
If there is a moon base, and I have no reason to doubt its reality, I'm certain its extraterrestrial in origin. Enough weird films, photos, and witness testimony from more credible sources exist for me to think this.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
and by moon base, do you mean human or alien? because it is certainly not human.
The problem with UFO/ET evidence is that everybody demands unfabricated provenience. Meaning a verifiable source of origin that is more than likely real, like government archives.
secondly, why would the conversation be worthless, EVEN if proven true? you sound very closed-minded to me.
Far from that. I want to keep most of the false information out of what I read upon this subject. I remove contradictory information and information that comes from lesser sources that won't help convince anybody.
edit: strange. it seems that even if all of this info were beyond a doubt proven true, you still consider it useless. very strange indeed.
Alright, so you heard them say it. Who are you and how can you prove that you heard it? Unfortunately, your testimony will do nothing for the cause of getting UFO/ET information out of our government even if you are absolutely 100% telling the truth. Who you are and how much physical evidence you have go a LOT farther to remove this mystery than anonymous internet user testimony.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
sorr,y not useless to me. i HEARD them say it, and HEARD their voices otherwise. theres no way it was adulterated or faked. this was NOT a transcript i heard. next?
No, because I don't trust anything of this nature. Just like I don't trust the Majestic 12 documents. The origins of this information destroys its usefulness. It would have to have come from a government archive, or be verified by at least two independent sources with credible backgrounds who worked for the government for me to think it was anything remotely accurate. Bob Lazar, Bill Cooper, and Phil Schneider types don't cut it as you couldn't trust them to give you correct change if they were cashiers.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
so, basically what you are saying is if i could find you the actual recording, you would believe me. ill start looking again.
How would thinking in the manner I do make me a #ing crackpot? There is enough info to prove UFO/ET visitation, but I am not about to go talking like Majestic 12 or the Pepper Transcript are a part of reality. That would make me a #ing crackpot.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
ROFL. yea, so you think that the govt. would actually let that happen. youre a #ing crackpot.
We have gotten two government workers to talk about at least a few UFO events. Like the March 16, 1967 UFO incident at Malmstrom AFB where UFOs took down 16 or so nuclear missiles in their silos. We've also got many government personnel claiming Roswell as being an extraterrestrial event, including retired astronauts. It happens...rarely, but it does happen.
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
you want proof verified by atleast TWO govt workers, and coming from the govt. vaults. and you actually believe that could have a snowballs chance in hell of happening. it will be a VERY cold day down there when that comes about.