Originally posted by darklanser
Wow, you're talented. You found three distinct euphemisms for the "act". Brilliance at work. However I believe the third word doesn't mean quite
what you think in this instance.
Glad you noticed dude!! I was gonna get really crude but then I saw the hate being pumped (ooer) around this thread and reckoned I better not overstep
the mark.
I'm pretty sure I got the third word correct. I can't link you to www.dictionary.com to prove it though as the word is too dirty and you gotta sign
up to view it!!! Wh woulda thought it!!!?
Anyway, way I see it is that it should be live and let live. If people want to be gay that's there business. As long as they don't try to shove
their beliefs down other peoples throats (ooer) I don't see any harm. The same goes for the religious aspects. You have people who are both
diametrically opposed at both ends of the scale.
Someone stated that if a religion is 2000 years old, it must be right. But why is this the case? Shouldn't a religion adapt with man.
I read somewhere that Jews don't eat pork because of the Bible tells them not to. But one modern day view is that this was because there was no
refrigeration back then and pork is pretty dangerous when it goes off. Food poisoning in your tribe is not going to help you in your quest for a
homeland. It doesn't mean that pork is evil.
I look on homosexuality in the same way. The Adam and Steve arguers don't really hold any great affection in my eyes. Anti homosexuality had it's
reasons back then. It doesn't make it right now.
Like I said, if people want to be gay let 'em. But this is a heterosexual society. Nature makes it that way and dictates the majority. So if you want
to march for your right to be gay - great!! Just don't keep harping onto the rest of us how cool it is.