Correction: no link between Saddam and al Qaeda, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 09:55 AM by astrocreep
Originally posted by sirCyco
I know I'm not supposed to out this sort of ideology but, what are ya gonna do? I'm rule breaker. I'm such a scalawag.

If anything you seem to not be a rule breaker...you appear to agree with bush inc.'s decisions on the reasons for this war...


Whatever you have to paint me as to discredit my argument is fine with me. Too bad you can't go back and edit out my posts but if you talk really nice to a moderator maybe you can get them erased so no one can see them. I don't know how anyone could read this post and not think my citicisms of the pres aren't as strong as anyone else's. But thats how you all are..you want to put people in either a pro Bush or Anti Bush catagory when he is but a passing figure in all this. It seems that either you're trying to distract from my overall view or your obsessed with mr. Bush like so many others. he will be out soon but we will still face the same problems. The problem with American politics is that its all smoke and mirrors. Whoever the power behind the scenes wants in gets in. Our votes don't count for crap as proof by the last election which played out as if scripted by Vince McMahon of pro wrestling. Skadi is right about the various organizations which exist for one reason and thats the socialization of the planet and the US is designed to be the financial engine and all of us , slaves to it..ah but you see, the spoiler lies in the middle east. See, its not about one side or the other. Its not about half the pie verses the other half. Its about many different pieces all pulling a separate way, all making the world weaker and more suseptible. If you're into politics, then you're being played and distracted by either side. Makes no difference.


reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 10:50 AM by astrocreep
Originally posted by sirCyco
planes have been falling since the early 70's.......why didnt they start any wars then??? again i would like to know why exactly the islamic leaders in the middle east hate us so much?....which is primarley my point.....its because we asked for it...we brought this on our selves and there is no "good" reason for occuping iraq......they didnt pose any threat to us and these suicide bombing are a terroristic problem that actually poses no "real" threat to national security.....again...i would like to here how you think the muslims plan to take over the world which you have claimed is a real threat...real enough to goto war with a country whose leader was NOT a radical islamic leader...but rather an easy targert with vast oil fields that we now control...


Why do they hate us?

Hmm. lets see. Because we live lives with liberties that they don't think we should have. Again, their reasons , not mine. We don't obey their religious rites and follow their doctrine. To a fanatic, thats reason enough. So, if by ignoring the way we're told they want us to live is bringing it on ourselves, then I guess that is technically the case. So score one for you.

How do they plan to take over the world?

Well, I think terrorism is working out pretty good for them so far. they did manage to nearly cripple the entire country's economy with one swift blow..so as they say, ya gotta stick with what works. Plus, I don't think their into developing biologic weapons for scientific discovery and the good of humanity..but I could be wrong...I guess...and whens the last time you heard one turn down a "Nukular" weapon. he'd be like "Na'h" we're dropping that whole blow up the US thing for a while". Yeah , right.


Why did Bush attack Saddam because of all this?

because he was on the outs with the Saudis but he was also a big source financial backing for Bin Laden ...and whether he was or not, its easier to control all the different factions of them when you control the very epicenter of the whole area. Iraq is a stratigic point for more reasons than just the oil. If I remember right, we pulled our base of of Saudi Arabia, albeit very quietly and relocated it in Iraq where the US will now install a puppet regime and maintain control through it.


reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 11:01 AM by sirCyco
Because we live lives with liberties that they don't think we should have. Again, their reasons , not mine. We don't obey their religious rites and follow their doctrine.

you honestly believe this is the only reason they are attacking us?? i think its the other way around..we have put our western prejudices upon then and they are tired of it and are fighting back the only way they can.


Plus, I don't think their into developing biologic weapons for scientific discovery and the good of humanity..

the U.S. is into biological weapons for the good of humanity???? who is???

because he was on the outs with the Saudis but he was also a big source financial backing for Bin Laden ...and whether he was or not, its easier to control all the different factions of them when you control the very epicenter of the whole area. Iraq is a stratigic point for more reasons than just the oil. If I remember right, we pulled our base of of Saudi Arabia, albeit very quietly and relocated it in Iraq where the US will now install a puppet regime and maintain control through it.


this makes more sense than us being over there just becuase muslims are attempting genocide upon the whole world if they do not convert....but still...saudi is still muslem...they have obvious links to terrorism...why not just take them over and keep their oil money...its EXACTLY what we are doing in iraq...only saudi has more obvious links to terrorism then iraq ever did...



[Edited on 11-19-2003 by sirCyco]


reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:44 PM by astrocreep
Originally posted by Jakomo


How would YOU feel if during the next Presidential election, the Chinese government contributed millions of dollars to one party and endeavoured to help them win the election irregardless of any U.S. laws?

jakomo




Hey, that happened in the 90s and you're right, it wasn't an ideal situation and because of it, the world now faces a threat from them. Look, I am not defending our politicians..none of them. We have instance after instance, (like the one above) when they've sold out our country's best interests for money. Our current administration is no better but the fact that we struggle more everyday to retain the liberities that militant Muslims hate us for is a different argument in itself. What this whole damn argument boils down to is this...

Bottom line, they want us dead, we don't want to die.

Regardless of how much you tell us its our fault, we're still not going to die willingly. Now, if it were money or land or something tangible we were fighting over, then maybe we could appease...but people, you are arguing for a whole country(s) to submit themselves to hellish torture and death and I'm so friggin sorry but its not going to happen willingly.

Its a stalemate that will likely end in one of two ways because they sure as hell aren't going to be appeased by anything less and we are gonna continue to live until we die (Duh).

Now thats my last word on this subject because no matter what we all say or do, its not amounting to a hill of beans to change it now is it?

It's a useless argument. Is anyone arguing to them that they might stop trying to kill us and see if we can work it out? Hell, no! We might offend them because their religious belief is that they must kill us and we can't go stepping on that so all you Americans and Britains, and Germans, and French..ect. who don't choose to confrom just need to die..Go ahead, die.

Appeasment is for suckers.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags