For all of the Bush Haters...., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 18-11-2003 @ 01:06 PM by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by elevatedone

from : Ocelot


As for Osama he will never be caught. He is being protected by the CIA. He was and I still think he is a CIA Asset.


How did you come up with this one. Never heard this angle before ?



Here's an excellent place to start:

by Michel Chossudovsky
www.globalresearch.ca 16 November 2003 (revised 17 November 2003)
The URL of this article is:
globalresearch.ca...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the CBS report by Dan Rather is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the Pakistani military hospital on September 10, 2001, courtesy of America's ally, he was in all likelihood still in hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when the attacks occurred. In all probability, his whereabouts were known to US officials on the morning of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated negotiations with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden.

A recent Reuters report (11/13/03; scroll down) quoting Labeviere's book "Corridors of Terror" points to alleged "negotiations" between Osama bin Laden and the CIA, which took place two months prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAE, while bin Laden was recovering from a kidney dialysis treatment

Enemy Number One in hospital recovering from dialysis treatment "negotiating with CIA"?

The meeting with the CIA head of station at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAE was confirmed by a report in the French daily newspaper Le Figaro, published in October 2001. (See Alexandra Richard, at www.globalresearch.ca... ,

For a virtual tour of the hospital click www.ahdubai.com...


The "negotiations" between the CIA and Osama (a CIA "intelligence asset") is sheer disinformation. Even though the CIA has refuted the claim, the report serves to highlight Osama as a bona fide "Enemy of America," rather than a creation of the CIA. In the words of former CIA agent Milt Bearden in an interview with Dan Rather on September 12, 2001, “If they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one.”

Intelligence negotiations never take place on a hospital bed. The CIA knew Osama was at the American Hospital in Dubai. Rather than negotiate, they could have arrested him. He was on the FBI most wanted list.

According to the Reuters report: "At the time, bin Laden had a multi-million dollar price on his head for his suspected role in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa". So why did the hospital staff, who knew that Osama was at the American Hospital in Dubai, not claim the reward?

The Figaro report points to complicity between the CIA and Osama rather than "negotiation". (see excerpt below). Consistent with several other reports, it also points to the antagonism between the FBI and the CIA.

If the CIA had wanted to arrest Osama bin Laden prior to September 11, they could have done it then in Dubai. But they would not have had a the war on terrorism pretext for waging a major military operation in the Middle East and Central Asia.

The rest:
globalresearch.ca...


reply posted on 18-11-2003 @ 01:24 PM by CiderGood_HeadacheBad
Originally posted by elevatedone
How do you think Gore would have handled :

1. Septembe 11th ( the day of the attacks )

2. Chasing Osama ?

3. WMD - Iraq war ?

4. North Korea and nukes ?



1. Someone remind me how long it took the president to respond when the first plane hit? September 11th was caused by Bush's administration one way or another, either they provoked it with aggressive self centred foreign policy, or planned it and carried it out themselves. It was always clear that Bush wanted a war...

2. September 11th wouldn't have happened and so the hunt for Osama, if it was ever going on at all, would be low profile, and therefore he would be easier for special forces to catch.

3. There would never have been an Iraq war if Bush had not been in power, it was his ambition right from the start to invade. We know there are no WMD in Iraq. Maybe Gore wouldn't have lied to you...

4. As far as I know George W. Bush has done nothing at all to "handle" the North Korean situation. By labelling them as evil and speaking of conflict he has heightened tension in the region.

None of the situations you mentioned were handled competently by Bush. In fact, he was arguably to blame for a number of them. I'm not saying they were easy situations to take care of, but Bush did not act sensibly or responsibly.

I can't comment on Al Gore, as I don't know enough about the US political scene, but these issues affect the whole world, and so I saw fit to comment. I urge you not to vote for Bush, not just for your own sake but for the rest of the world also.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 11 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 4 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Posted 1 days ago with 16 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 12 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags