It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You and your government shouldn't keep your hopes up about that. There are shia's who've joined sunni resistance groups, and sunni's who've joined shia reistance groups. And no matter how much hate is around, everyone still hates your occupations guts.
you can't really generalise people
The first Muslims were of course from the Arabian Peninsula. When they pushed their religion northward into Iraq, Syria, and Iran they were of course met with some hostility because they did not appreciate these "foreigners" from the Arabian peninsula conquering them. Shortly after these peoples (Iraqis, Persians, and Syrians) were conquered and accepted Islam, they still considered themselves different from the original muslims from the Arabian peninsula and held some animosity.
So Shi'ites are Syrian, Persian, and Mesopotamian in ethnicity while Sunis are Arabian (from Arabian Peninsula) in origin.
Originally posted by jsobecky
It's pretty clear, at least to me, that the violence in Iraq is a case of Iraqi's killing Iraqi's. This conflict is centuries old. It's also clear to me that Saddam controlled these factions with an iron fist. Al Maliki is too weak to control the situation, that is why he is doomed to fail.
But the conflict betwen Sunni and Shi'ite brings up a question: how do you tell a Sunni from a Shi'ite? I mean, apart from the religious split. How do Sunnis know that they are killing Shi'ites and vice versa? Do they look different? Dress differently? Do they live in distinct neighborhoods?
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
No, the conflict is not centuries old. It is in fact an artificial event that is unique to this century, and brought about by the war that so many on this board seem to enjoy - and for that very reason, it seems.
What caused the original divide?
The groups first diverged after the Prophet Muhammad died in 632, and his followers could not agree on whether to choose bloodline successors or leaders most likely to follow the tenets of the faith.
The group now known as Sunnis chose Abu Bakr, the prophet’s adviser, to become the first successor, or caliph, to lead the Muslim state. Shiites favored Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law. Ali and his successors are called imams, who not only lead the Shiites but are considered to be descendants of Muhammad. After the 11th imam died in 874, and his young son was said to have disappeared from the funeral, Shiites in particular came to see the child as a Messiah who had been hidden from the public by God.
The largest sect of Shiites, known as “twelvers,” have been preparing for his return ever since.
How did the violence start?
In 656, Ali’s supporters killed the third caliph. Soon after, the Sunnis killed Ali’s son Husain.
Fighting continued but Sunnis emerged victorious over the Shiites and came to revere the caliphate for its strength and piety.
Shiites focused on developing their religious beliefs, through their imams.
And yet here you are once again generalizing people. Syrian sister I enjoy your posts they provide me with almost endless opportunity for a good giggle. So to echo a previous poster instead of trying to spread hate again try to share your knowledge using a little less propoganda who knows I might even change my opinion; certainly I would like to understand a society that is different then mine and learn more about it. Care to share?
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Why would you want to tell the difference. The less difference the better.
The only way to tell is through the ID card, and even then it's probably fake.
I do think its fantastic that Shiites and Sunnis have re-discovered that they hate each other more than they Hate Westerners !
You and your government shouldn't keep your hopes up about that. There are shia's who've joined sunni resistance groups, and sunni's who've joined shia reistance groups. And no matter how much hate is around, everyone still hates your occupations guts.
^hotpinkurinal mint.
Informative, but one small correction, tha majority of Syria is sunni though not ethnically arab.
[edit on 20-12-2006 by Syrian Sister]
Originally posted by jsobecky
But my question was serious. Iraqis attacking Iraqis. How can they be sure they are not attacking their own group?
Originally posted by jsobecky
I beg to differ. The violence today may seem more intense, but that's only because weapons are more deadly now.
Originally posted by Impreza
I'd just like to let you all know that it is the shi'a muslims who want the destruction of anything and everyone non-muslim. The sunni may also call westerners kafur, but they do not in any way wish to kill people simply because they have different beliefs. I'm no expert on this subject matter, but that's what I've gathered in the several years I spent living in Northern Iraq, as a kurd. My parents are from Iran, but they moved to Iraq after the Shah was overthrown in the late 70's.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Good question...all these folks look alike...even to them. So what really seperates the groups? Do they they each ride different breeds of camels or something?
You have voted AnarShia for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
You know, to be honest, i could care less which group wants the destruction of all non-Muslims or the west yadda yadda yadda. Point blank it ain't happenin.
And what religion is it that Iran's president follows that permits him to make statements suggesting that Israel be wiped off the map? Sounds like a real peaceful religion to me.
some orthodox jews want israel wiped of the map...
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Yes but he has stated many times how "religious" he is. He even sent Bush a letter this past year encouraging him to join his faith. If he is so deeply religious, then again i ask what religion permits him to speak freely about exterminating a people?
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Last time i checked, David Duke wasnt the president of a country either.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
I dont think thats the reason David Duke isnt the president of our country...i dont think the American people would elect an idiot like that. Iran on the other hand..........