It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AFAICR, it was pirates (Not the disney kind) that burried the treasure...?
Originally posted by whowantsahero
According to them Francis Bacon is the one who buried these treasures.
Originally posted by Marduk
btw theres an "A" in Murduk
There's an "A" in Ass too
Originally posted by Marduk
There's an "A" in Ass too
theres also an "A" in pedantic
I spent 5 minutes mocking up that picture on photoshop
I can't believe no one thought it was funny
Originally posted by whowantsahero
Thanks for the feedback, Mcphisto. I wasn't all that interested in the subject before, just relaying what I knew about it, but if they made an artificial beach even, then that's definitely interesting. If you ever come across that book, let me know what it was. I'm sure my uncle would love to read it, and I'd be interested as well.
Originally posted by ConfederacyOfUnity
maybe instead of bashing each other...you could provide some really good info..because the current info is...its a hole..thats deep..that has nothing of value
Keith Ranville, a First Nations man
Originally posted by Marduk
Keith Ranville, a First Nations man
yes very indian name that Ranville
how about Keith is that an indian name as well
this guy was posting his theories at Unexplained mysteries some months ago
he talks a complete load and doesn't seem to have more than a basic education
so typical consipracy theorest imo
he even posts under an assumed name and sometimes mentions that he has a book coming out about it
troll madman or poor deluded fool
only you can decide
It was not a sinkhole, as you suggested. Templar treasure pit theories are at least compatible with the evidence, whereas the sinkhole idea is virtually impossible to reconcile with the physical evidence. Of all the theories I have read, only the Templar one is plausible, imho.
I have read numerous books, maybe a dozen, specifically on it. I have read maybe 50 related books.
It is not as well known that there are the remains of a stone castle on the plateau above Oak Island, which is of 14th century Scandinavian design.
Only they had the skill, manpower, means to travel there, and possible valuable cargo to hide.
That fits with the Newport tower, also of that style.
The prevailing explanation among historians for the origin of the structure is the "Arnoldist" explanation, namely that the tower was a mill constructed "from the ground up" in the middle or late 17th century by Rhode Island colonial governor Benedict Arnold, great-grandfather of the patriot-traitor. It is known that Arnold, who moved into the area in 1661, once owned the land on which the tower stands.
Of all the theories I have read, only the Templar one is plausible
Originally posted by Cowboy Clint
Just out of curiosity, Does anyone have a modern pic of the legendary stone tablet they found? The closest I've seen of it is a very grainy old black and white photo.
Originally posted by Cowboy Clint
Also, why not just quarry out the damned treasure? Is there a reason why they use a narrow shaft?