Originally posted by searching_for_truth
Interesting indeed. I have read a lot of items about this "HIV does not exist stuff" Some, even mentioned as "documented cases". Well, I am no
expert on this. But why would someone make this kind of claim? What would be the purpose?
As I mentioned earlier... the reason is, it's a terrible layers attempt at defence.
The despicable man indicted here allegedly infected women with HIV by having unprotected sex knowing full well he was HIV +
In reality this case may never get to court as it's initial argument is flawed. To have a trial you need to submit your case to the court prior to a
hearing.
I mean what Serious Judge would put the Existence of HIV and AIDS on trial??
I suspect the Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos client has not agreed to pleading guilty or temp insane and will plead 'not guilty'...
This would have caused Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos to try and come up with the goods or loose the client.
She should have walked away... because her rep will be on the floor by now.
All the best,
NeoN HaZe.