It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As the deer pants for streams of water,
so my soul pants for you, O God.
Originally posted by NowAmFound
Remember, Christianity has been instrumental in advancing female rights and equality. Jesus taught that everyone is equal and loved by God. There was no misogyny in His message.
P.S. Come to think of it, no homophobia either. The bible makes a statement of the wrongness of the action of homosexuality, not the worth of the individuals who engage in it.
[edit on 17-12-2006 by NowAmFound]
Just so you know PALSMS are in th OT not the NT.
Originally posted by spines
Well, I shall post what I find to be a beautiful passage from the NT.
While I may not follow the bible as fact and I may not believe in God's existense I can still find some of its writings, as with the Quran, beautiful. The best place for beautifully written material is, in my humble opinion, The Book of Psalms.
As the deer pants for streams of water,
so my soul pants for you, O God.
I just love the image and the poetic brilliance of the piece. I do not take any spiritual satisfaction from the passage. But rather, I enjoy it for its beauty alone.
EDIT: It is Psalm 42 I believe.
[edit on 12/17/0606 by spines]
Originally posted by shihulud
On Topic: There are maybe a few good life guides in the NT but that still doesnt mean that you should follow the NT even if your are not christian. I see no reason to change my lifestyle which BTW has some of the NT life guides in it just because I read part of the bible.
Morals, ethics , love etc is not the soul domain of christianity or any religion
Originally posted by shihulud
You can be a non-theist and still live by the same good values as any religionite.
Originally posted by melatonin
The NT paints a rather different picture. Just one example - Husbands should love their wives, but women should submit to their husbands.
Originally posted by melatonin
Just one example - Husbands should love their wives, but women should submit to their husbands.
As for homophobia, stating the action is wrong is enough to classify. But the NT goes further with Paul stating they are 'worthy of death'. Even effeminate men get a hard time. Guess it depends on your interpretation though.
There is no term that means homosexual orientation in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts of the Bible. The authors of the Bible did not understand sexual orientation and thus did not write about it.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I guess it does indeed depend on interpretation... Seeing as how there was no term for homosexuality in the original languages of the bible.
There is no term that means homosexual orientation in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts of the Bible. The authors of the Bible did not understand sexual orientation and thus did not write about it.
Originally posted by kinglizard
Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable. [NIV Leviticus 18:22]
If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable.[NIV Leviticus 20:13]
And with a male thou shalt not lie down in beds of a woman; it is an abomination. That is, "rather than forbidding male homosexuality, it simply restricts where it may occur."
Many conservative Christians trust the KJV and NIV. Thus, when they read some of the passages that clearly and unmistakably condemn homosexuality, they are inclined to trust the translators and conclude that God hates homosexuality.
Originally posted by kinglizard
Anyway please lets get back to sharing verses from the NT.