It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Canuck
Eventually, and I mean in quite awhile, Humans will develop a natural immunity to the disease like we did with the common cold. Well, we would not be immune, but our bodies would have better defence against the disease...... you get the picture.
Originally posted by Canuck
www.onelife.com...
Read that, Xenongod.
Originally posted by exdog
it doesn't take evolution for the immune system to develop immunity to certain strains of viri-
did you know you never catch the same exact strain of cold or flu twice? Think Flu shots and Homeopthy...specific amounts of exposure can allow one to come into contact with the virus without contracting the symptoms-although just because you don't "get" the flu if you have been immunized doesn't mean you can't still be a "carrier"
Natural selection then determines the fate of the mutation in the species gene pool. The test is not survivability or excellence. The test is in species population growth. If the mutation aids the growth of the species population then it is successful and will remain in the gene pool. If it does not, natural selection will remove it from the gene pool (through death and hardship).
Originally posted by Canuck
Originally posted by exdog
it doesn't take evolution for the immune system to develop immunity to certain strains of viri-
did you know you never catch the same exact strain of cold or flu twice? Think Flu shots and Homeopthy...specific amounts of exposure can allow one to come into contact with the virus without contracting the symptoms-although just because you don't "get" the flu if you have been immunized doesn't mean you can't still be a "carrier"
That is part of evolution, once you've come in contact with the disease, your immune system begins to develop means with which to destroy it.
Even the flu-shot which you mention, is a part of human evolution.
What seperates us from animals is the fact that we can change the world around us to improve the quality of life for ourselves, which is part of evolution.
When we learn a new technique for surgery, that's evolution on a civilization level, not a personal level.
Same goes for pretty much any technology that improves the way we live, not luxury things mind you. More the necessities than anything else.
Originally posted by Canuck
Natural selection then determines the fate of the mutation in the species gene pool. The test is not survivability or excellence. The test is in species population growth. If the mutation aids the growth of the species population then it is successful and will remain in the gene pool. If it does not, natural selection will remove it from the gene pool (through death and hardship).
The accident happens, nature then decides if it stays.
Helps to keep reading sometimes.
[Edited on 28-11-2003 by Canuck]
Originally posted by xenongod
This thread is not the place to start an evolution debate. Nothing has ever evolved into a better organism...always to the worse. Get real.
Originally posted by Canuck
And yes, Exdog. But in my view, anything that furthers the human race is human evolution.
Whether it be a new technology we create, or a (new)natural immunity that slowly works it's way into our immune systems over a period of hundreds of generations.