Originally posted by zorgon
Obviously you do not understand what Natural Colors mean when the USGS says that. I am willing to take them at their word because they post them right
above the directory that has the False Color versions.
No, I do not understand what they mean.
In my opinion they may mean that those are the colours as a normal human being would see them, or they may mean that those are not false colours
because they were not shifted to a different colour.
If we use a camera that has a ultra-violet, a red and 3 infra-red filters, the images made with the combination of those filters are the natural
colours seen with those filters, but they are not the colours as we would see them.
If instead they used the broad-band filter, then the images have all the colours that we see.
This is my only problem with the colours.
The purpose of this thread was to show the public these beautiful images, and to discuss the CONTENT of these images... To make a statement
that you will not comment on the content is ridiculous!
I said that I will not comment until I know what I am talking about. I am not willing to talk about a golden area on the Moon when in fact that area
has a different colour and appears golden only because the photo was taken with a different filter.
I make enough mistakes when I know what I am talking about, that is why I want to really know what I am talking about
before I make the
comments, not after.
AH I see what is going on here...
You won't comment on the image content, because you and the others intend to fill this thread with constant arguments about color.
Apparently you don't see it.
I do not have any intention of filling this thread with arguments about colour.
If other people want to do that, that's their business, not mine.
All of my posts here on ATS have been my own opinions or my way of showing something to others. I have never made any post in combination with other
ATS members, and I would never join other members just with the intention of filling any thread with any type of posts (I think that may even go
against the paragraph 2d of the T&C).
Not one of you will answer me directly as to WHEN you first saw these tiffs and the mapper... seeing as they were around so long... not one of you has
presented these images in any thread or even a portion of one of them, nor provided a link to anything regarding them. It is easy to search after the
fact... the point is I am willing to bet you hve never seen these images in the .tiff or mapper before this thread.... Again that was part of the
purpose... to share these images
I have seen those images before this thread but because of
this post that
you made. (PS: what happened to the images you posted in that thread?)
I never presented those images because you were going to do it and because I was not interested in doing it.
What color they are or are not also has nothing to do with whats IN the images... if a crater is blue or purple in false color, and shows the center
blacked out or its in natural color with the center blacked out, the fact remains the CENTER IS BLACKED OUT... we are asking WHY... for what
purpose... Seems a simple enough request, doesn't it?
Yes, it is a simple request, but I was not answering your request, my answer about not commenting the photos was to
undo, that said that no one
told what that "fire thing" was.
That "fire thing" looks only as a "fire thing" because of the colours, that was the reason for my answer.