Originally posted by zorgon
All the knowledge that NASA et al have in regards to image generation...
Like you told us, it wasn't a NASA mission, so NASA can not be the one to blame in this case.
Let me see if I can explain what I have understood about the colours.
This its what they say in the PDF on the link provided by
zorgon:
The cameras were equipped with a set of special color filters selected to provide the maximum amount of information about the surface
mineralogy of the Moon and Geographos. The images and other data returned from lunar mapping cover 100% of the Moon's surface at spatial resolutions
that cannot be obtained from observatories on Earth.
Common rock-forming minerals on the Moon and in meteorites can be identified by color in the visible and infrared portion of the spectrum. Major
silicate minerals can be recognized by their absorption of particular colors in the near-infrared from reflected sunlight (see Figure 4). Thus, rocks
composed of various amounts of these minerals can be distinguished and mapped by means of the multispectral images taken with Clementine's
cameras.
source
So, they didn't want to take photos with the colours we usually see, they wanted to see the Moon under those lights to spot specific differences
between the different types of rock.
They also have an image showing the different wavelengths of various filters (the information its the same as that posted by
Saviour Of The
Real, only the image is different, and I think this is easier to understand).
As you can see, they could not have a Red, a Green and a Blue version of the images using those filters.
But they could create an almost normal image using the filters they had, as you can see in the following image, a composite image.
Originally posted by undo
No one has as yet told me what that fire thing is, or even bothered to address the anomalies. All I see is, critiques of the words used by the USGS.
If you don't like their word usage, take it up with them.
I will not comment on things seen in those images that could have a different aspect with a different colour before I know if we are seeing or not the
true colours, as a normal human being sees them.
And I am not criticising their words, I simply want to understand what are we talking about before starting to make conclusions, I could make
conclusions based on wrong information.
PS: if we find these images, with a resolution of 100m per pixel, fantastic, imagine what those taken by the high-resolution camera are, with a
resolution of 8m per pixel.