anybody got pattern recognition software for images?

i have this, well, interesting piece that seems to have words on it but
i can't make out what it is exactly.

Post the image, undo. That way we can all have a look at it.

sanc

Originally posted by undo
i mean, i suppose i could get it where the background was more interesting, but then the things that look like letters look even less like letters.

I do not see anything that looks like letters, I can only see that the white dots look aligned in rows.

If the image from where you took this was a highly compressed JPG then the rows could be just a result of the compression.

Happy New Year everyone...

January and February are busy months for me... so I will not be on as often..
I will be away from my computer for the next few days... and will only have time to check in for a few minutes, so don't panic at my absence LOL

Undo, this is a very interesting photo. Since I do not have pattern software I picked up on the patterns visually. First back away from your screen approx 2' now look at the patterns concentrate on the patterns. Back up 4' now 6' 8' now 10'. You will now see patterns the farther away from the screen the better. Take your hand cup it look thru the tunnel thru your hand you will be surprised what you will see in the photo concerning different patterns. Rik Riley

RikRiley,

No doubt! That's awesome. After a bit, it sorta gets a 3D effect, better depth perception. Now that's very cool.

I know this has been discussed before but maybe someone can clarify this for me. Observatories have been around for many many years and some really great photographs have been taken of the Earth's Moon. Where are all of these photographs from observatories to make comparisons with from satellite and ground zero photos of the Moon. Yes I relize there is some really good amatuer and Pro photos out there of the Moon. Is it possible since many of these observatories have government grants that the photos are controled by our Government and will not be released or are sensored. I understand that photos of the Moon from observatories do not match up with satellite photos of anomolies or craters they tend to disapear in many cases. Rik Riley

Originally posted by rikriley
I know this has been discussed before but maybe someone can clarify this for me. Observatories have been around for many many years and some really great photographs have been taken of the Earth's Moon. Where are all of these photographs from observatories to make comparisons with from satellite and ground zero photos of the Moon.

Good question and yes I did mention it before... I even wrote to the director of Mt Palomar 200" observatory...

Here is his reply....

Hi Ron,

I haven't seen any images of the Moon from Palomar either. It is possible that some were taken long ago, but astronomers would rather explore the Moon with spacecraft and use the big telescopes for observing much, much fainter objects.

Clear skies,

- Scott
W. Scott Kardel
Public Affairs Coordinator, Palomar Observatory
Telephone: (760) 742-2111
E-mail: wsk@astro.caltech.edu
WWW:www.palomar-observatory.org

When I have time and can get the addresses I will contact others, especially foreign ones.

But that answer is scary It means that all they have is one source of images to study... from NASA

[edit on 8-1-2007 by zorgon]

Thru a web-site such as ATS if allowed solicite without payment around the world photos of the Earth's Moon taken thru telescopes that individuals have kept old and new, amatuer or professional photographs and are willing to donate to the cause of the truth. This way we would have photos old and new to compare with todays mostly airbrushed and overlayed phony satellite and ground zero Moon photos. Rik Riley

Originally posted by rikriley
This way we would have photos old and new to compare with todays mostly airbrushed and overlayed phony satellite and ground zero Moon photos. Rik Riley

It's funny about that... I asked a guy in the Bahama's with a 16" scope and he told me it was not possible to take shots of the moon with any color... when i showed him the one Mike took with the 10 inch in the UK he never wrote back...

Maybe people have been brainwashed for so long that the moon is black and white...

You are so right Zorgon. What tends to happen when a human is told something does not exist the brain shuts down and they do not see things that are right before their eyes. This includes looking thru a telescope at the Earth's Moon and seeing colors and anomolies. Someone of so called authority tells the populace that life does not exist outside our Earth they tend to believe them. You can show them proof of life on another planet and their brain will shut down and still not except the visual truth. There are always exceptions to the rules many humans think out of the box and we are called weird in many circles. Rik Riley

[edit on 13-1-2007 by rikriley]

sounds like a great idea i`ve got some i`ve taken with 35mm and digital

All of you are really working very hard and as I look at the pictures all I see is what looks like the artificial sky them there Grey's have created down under.

You guys get an A+

Originally posted by observe50
All of you are really working very hard and as I look at the pictures all I see is what looks like the artificial sky them there Grey's have created down under.

Ummmm Artificial Sky? Greys? You have proof?

I saw these pictures in nasa worldwind moon and it made me think. Maybe they are dislosing this information in the public, but there is no enough interest from population to know the truth even if its coming out before there eyes.

I realy want to know why the moon is green, what will NASA made up, or is in the mood to cnofess the real truth about these pics? If i can make color pics with my camere of 100€ why will NASA have problem to do that, are they just trying the inteligence of the people? They will not tell the truth directly, but in these way we must interpretate their answers.

If there isnt any UFO that doesent mean there isnt any extraterestrial vehicle, becouse for them its not a UFO "udentified flying object", becouse they know what is it, maybe we must ask them the right question.

test



[edit on 2-10-2007 by Alexander the o.k.]

Originally posted by zorgon
Good question and yes I did mention it before... I even wrote to the director of Mt Palomar 200" observatory...

Here is his reply....

Hi Ron,

I haven't seen any images of the Moon from Palomar either. It is possible that some were taken long ago, but astronomers would rather explore the Moon with spacecraft and use the big telescopes for observing much, much fainter objects.

Clear skies,

- Scott
W. Scott Kardel
Public Affairs Coordinator, Palomar Observatory
Telephone: (760) 742-2111
E-mail: wsk@astro.caltech.edu
WWW:www.palomar-observatory.org

When I have time and can get the addresses I will contact others, especially foreign ones.

But that answer is scary It means that all they have is one source of images to study... from NASA

[edit on 8-1-2007 by zorgon]

Z,
Great thread.
1st post here, so go easy.

Here is what that reply means to me:

I haven't seen any images of the Moon from Palomar either.

= Government speak for "Sure they exist, I just haven't seen them personally".

It is possible that some were taken long ago...

= They were, "but (I) astronomers would rather explore the Moon with spacecraft".
Because any high res close ups from spacecraft would be under strict NASA control.
So, he didn't actually lie outright, he, let us say, "equivicated".
Keep in mind this is from the Public Affairs Coordinator, not the director.
You have to parse Gov speak in order to get real meaning out of it.
Try this experiment:
Write him back, or call with this reply " Scott, where are the archived pics of luna from the 30's 40's and 50's kept. What address ? "
This is a specific question(s) which should force a specific response.
What did we use before spacecraft?
'Scopes and high res cameras.
This is covered in Ingo Swann's book 'Penetration...'
Reminder;
Nasa is no longer a civilian agency, and hasn't been for some time.
Guess under whose control it is?
All revealing pics would fall under 'national security', and be exempt from public disclosure.

Ah... but your idea of going outside NASA is brilliant!

Great idea, by the way of contacting foreign observatories.
I think you'll get farther, much faster with them.
Keep up the great work!