It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eaglewingz
The "Roswell Proof: Where is it?" thread MAY be recoverable through Google cache. It's somewhat hit and miss, but here's a few pages:
Page 9
Page 11
Page 10
Page 20
[edit on 12/28/2006 by eaglewingz]
Originally posted by Shawnna
Perhaps no one will touch the issue of the destroyed 24 page thread and the banned author (whether destroyed by accident or design) is because questioning the motives for anything that happens on ATS usually leads to some significant backlash.
Always,
Shawnna
Since you failed to answer it; i guess it was.
Originally posted by thelibra
Now was there really a need for that question?
Originally posted by Shawnna
See what I mean, folks?
Originally posted by nightwing
How did we go from gratitude to
just getting silly ? Oh well, what do you suggest as to topic and location, Springer ?
Originally posted by sigung86
THE VIEW FROM THE CHEAP SEATS ...
Shawnna with to N Ns - Is it possible that Springer is not really bound and determined to be beating on you? Is it possible that you are simply taking whatever he says in that fashion? This isn't the only thread, as I vaguely recall, where you appear to have gotten into that mindset. And before you bash on me, consider that I have had words with Springer too. He docked me 1000 points for misusing the Tag feature. However, it's not a big deal. Life is meant to be gotten on with. Today doesn't always have to be the same as yesterday. And I certainly don't hate Springer for whatever misunderstanding of the forum I may have had ... At least not after sending him a u2u in which I rather openly accused him of getting his jollies over deducting the 1000 points.
You have to understand that, at any given moment, people are operating with the best tools they have available at that time. That includes Springer, as well as you. Why don't you give him a chance and see how it goes? It might be that he does, in fact, have it in for you. However, it's also possible, and far more likely that one slip, or one error on his part has set the tenor for the relationship from your perspective. And he can't get out from under that particular perception.
Just thoughts and I am waiting for all the superior intellects to sweep me back to the cheap seats.
Originally posted by thelibra
It occurs to me that more and more skeptics are getting a bad name because of hecklers who will always cry "photochop" or "hoax" without even a cursory examination of the evidence. Likewise, there are those who will cry "brilliant" or "genuine" without even doing a contrast check to see the string holding the paper plate in the photo. This schism is really starting to tear apart some of the membership here.
I'd like to extend this thread as a sort of olive branch between the UFOlogists and the Skeptics.
What I propose is that skeptics, like myself, whom are willing to give UFO cases a fair go, examine the evidence, and present an unbiased finding, drop their card in this thread. We can police our own easily enough, and hopefully we can draw a definitive line between the automatic "nay-sayers and yes-men", and those whom would give UFO cases an honest hard look at the facts, and then present a lucid case as to why we arrived at our conclusions.
Then, if a UFOlogist honestly believes they have something genuine, they can U2U the people on this list a link to their thread and ask for their analysis. Or, I suppose, alternately, they could just post a link in this thread.
Anyway, if the "Fair Skeptics" would like to put themselves on the list as good representatives of the skeptic community, maybe we can start bridging the gap that's forming. Feel free to list any special talents you have or qualifications for verifying or debunking cases.