Originally posted by The Vagabond
It's a brilliant and worthwhile idea, chuckle factor or no. Imagine being able to put recon on the ground in 2 hours flat anywhere in the world,
regardless of where the carriers are, which bases we have to close or are forbidden by hosts to operate from, etc.
Though being able to put a dozen or so guys on the ground may not seem impressive at a glance, but picture this. We intercept a phone call that lets
us know that Bin Laden is leaving a meeting somewhere in the city of Mogadishu, but that's all we know... even if there isn't a single American
within a thousand miles, we can have snipers on every highway out of town before he can be gone.
Id love to see the day when we had that capability.
But what ultimate good is it? Would the result ever justify the enormous costs? After all, haven't we been trying to get away from having human
bodies put in hostile situations, since more times than not these days they only create possible problems by getting killed or captured, or killing a
bunch of schoolkids instead of the bad guys? Nice clean remote-controlled bombs. That's the way to go.
And I'm scratching my poor head to try to come up with a scenario where such insertion would be necessary. Maybe in some kind of James Bond world,
where Bond has to fly in from orbit at the last moment to disable the nuclear laser bomb of some mad super villian. Otherwise, where and against whom
would this force be projected? A bunch of car bombers in Baghdad? Nothing would ever require that kind of rapid, personal response.
It's cool, but really kind of ridiculous. We already know where bin Laden is, and flying in a bunch of raygun-toting Space Marines isn't going to
magically solve any terror problems or political hairballs. We already have plenty of Marines in situations where they don't belong, doing
poorly-defined jobs in areas where we're not wanted. And it's already too expensive.