Alien Communication and the Evolution Homo Sapiens IS Now Underway

page: 7
1
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 11:54 AM
link   
I have downloaded several sine/wave tone generator files, and although I haven't had a chance to test them all (only about three) so far there is only one that will allow a decimal tone under 1.0 (0.834Hz), but it will not populate the thousands space (the "4" in 0.834Hz). It only gives me a .83Hz readout.

AA, is this .83Hz fine, or does someone know of a tone generator that outputs to the thousands place - .834Hz instead of just .83Hz?

Also, I WAS able to have the file run as a .wav file to 13 minutes and 30 seconds (13 1/2 minutes), which is equal to 810 seconds.

AA, if the end recording runs 13 minutes and 28 or 29 seconds will that affect the outcome?

I have files I am happy to upload, and I can make them smaller files if need be. I'll use the sites when I get something to upload...




[edit on 14-12-2006 by OnTheDeck]



Gin

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 12:17 PM
link   
OnTheDeck, just to make a correction, it should be 0.834Hz.

Has anyone found a good tone generator? The one I'm using, NCH Tone Generator, won't allow me to put 0.834Hz, it just leaves it to 0.83Hz.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 01:09 PM
link   


AA, is this .84Hz fine, or does someone know of a tone generator that outputs to the thousands place - .843Hz instead of just .84Hz?

Also, I WAS able to have the file run as a .wav file to 13 minutes and 30 seconds (13 1/2 minutes), which is equal to 810 seconds.

AA, if the end recording runs 13 minutes and 28 or 29 seconds will that affect the outcome?


OTD,
The correct frequency is .834 Sine, I would upload this as a wave file but it needs to come from someone else, I don’t want anyone call foul. Unfortunately I don’t want divulge the software program I use to create this frequency for the same reason.

Lets just say some of you posters are on the right track.

The 810 seconds is a must can’t be longer or shorter.

AA

Oh and for you posters that think I don’t have a clue about technology lol….


JSR

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 01:16 PM
link   
wheeeehooooo!!!

the roller-coaster is back.
this is going to be good.

round two of alien comm. is in full swing.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by mazzroth
OK I was a total sceptic as you can see in my previous post's, but I decided to give AA the benfit of the doubt. I have in my workshop some nice audio test equipment ( as Im an electronics tech by trade ) non the least of which is a digital SigGen and a very expensive accoustic detector used for accoustics ( industrial not musical ) that detects at an Ultra Low frequency that we use for ground penetrating radar.

I decided to setup the suggested frequency in a perfect Sinusoidal Wave form and output it at a low wattage to this accoustic detector ( it can also act as a sort of speaker ). I followed the directions set out by AA and to my astonishment something really weird happend.

Now I need to give this another few test's as I freaked at the sensations I recieved after listening to about 5-6 minutes of it and am not quite sure what to make of it. I will post my conclusions when I think I can portray accurately what happned and hopefully repeat it.

[edit on 14-12-2006 by mazzroth]


I'm glad you actually tried it. The ignorance of some people astounds me, so fast to judge, but not so fast to attempt.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 01:38 PM
link   
I assume others are working on creating this .wav file, but I wanted to add that as soon as I get a file to these exact specs I will upload it for all to use.

Thanks!



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by OnTheDeck
I assume others are working on creating this .wav file, but I wanted to add that as soon as I get a file to these exact specs I will upload it for all to use.

Thanks!


Looking forward to it OnTheDeck. I use Brainwave Generator, but I haven't messed around with any of the preset settings. I'll try it once I get home from work.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 02:22 PM
link   


For the freaking record, unlike everyone else here I DID try this tonight. I had a slight buzzing in the back of my head much like the stream technique and started to feel light. I started to get queezy and am currently taking a break.


That feeling is normal in any meditation.

I'm not saying the meditation doesn't work. I'm open minded to it.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Hmmmm... Another exhausting read through a convoluted thread about an intriguing topic with lots of mudslinging and only a tiny amount of as yet unsubstantiated substance. I read through twice to make sure I wasn't missing something. After one sifts through the flak - nothing.

This seems to be par for the course on AA threads. Personally, Id like to credit AA with a benefit of the doubt, but the doubts are lingering and getting louder (but not at 0.834 Mhz). Still waiting... waiting...

For one thing - other than a few AA-afficiandos (plants?) there seems to be scant little evidence of success trying this method. Like the colors-in-the-head, the no-sound-makes-a sound-in-your-head method is so far drawing a blank -again. Mazz seemed to be on to something, but we haven't heard from him in a while. What happened, Mazz?

The score thus far: Naysayers ~100; Contactees: Zero. Why? AA - we would like to hear an explanation - perhaps some guidance. What are we doing wrong? Why isn't it working? Why don't you respond to those with legitimate questions about technique or process?

I hope AA doesn't once again start directing folks to WalMart for a telescope. I tried the colors - didn't work for me (just gave me a headache). Tried this too - can't hear anything (as you said we wouldn't) and I don't think any low-pitched tone is coming from my computer, speakers, or inside my head. The FOL picture is pleasing to view, but that's about it.

Frankly, I'm bored. I was hoping that I was just, you know, different, non-compliant perhaps - not tuned in correctly. Maybe that's not it at all. I'm beginning to feel as if I'm not so different - I'm actually like everyone else here who is honestly giving your methods a shot. IT ISN'T WORKING.

Ok - so you won't call it "Proof Positive" this time. Call it whatever you want. But you ARE alluding, quite emphatically, to a path to contact with sentient alien entities. Fermi's Paradox reigns: WHERE ARE THEY?

Some have suggested that the methods are beneficial exercises since they allow one to meditate, relax, etc., etc. That's great. But we're here because you promise communication with Aliens - in fact that such communication is well underway. With whom? So far, you alone claim such communication.

You're sharing - trying to at least. That's very commendable. AA - it's time to get real. Our minds are open. We've tried your methods.

Now what?



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:06 PM
link   
Ok, I was silent till now in this second 'contact this so 'enlightened' gray's' thread of AA.

I have very detailed knowledge in electronic and computer.
Electrotechnic is definitive NOT a whoo guhoo gnoohu mystical 'you humans have no clue' thing. It's one of the best understood and described discipline.

Without going into the details the ones that stated that you can say nothing of your pure 0.834Hz computer generated tone will emit from a connected loadspeaker are correct.
And ALSO it will hardly generate an EM-field in your computer that is significant enough to deserve the name EM field and specially not when you disconnect the loadspeaker. Your PC will generate a whole band of alot others, heigher and stronger EM-waves just that one you seek you will hardly find.

It's correct to say that AA's methode in gnerating the tone also as an EM-field is not working!! You will not have that field!

Now if AA wouldnt be that closed and just telling riddlen like methodes without explaing anything there would be ways to make it work.

Do you want an E-Field of 0.834Hz or do you want an M-Field of 0.834Hz or do you want an EM-Field like a radio wave with 0.834Hz or do you want an EM-Field where E and M is crossed different and maybe have a different phase shift?

About the 0.834 Hz wave file.. would not be difficult to artificial create such a file. I would generate an empty wave file of 13:30 lenght, and fill modify the data with a fast written small program.

But I think that's not usefull anyway. You need to modulate the tone in order to get it out of the pc. (mixing two tones close to each other is one way, there are others.)

personel I doubt that this new methode should be any better than his old.
You have to consider that his last methode failed completly. No one made contact with his grays over all this month or at least no one reported to had contact with them.
No gray info from AA has come forward also.
And nothing AA claimed for OTD, OTD could confirm.

Byway AA could you precise this gray beeings you reffer too a little more. Paint a picture pls.


Originally posted by mazzroth
This is weird phenomenom using that tone, I just shifted the tone up a few 0.001 HZ's and nothing. The I shifted it down a few and nothing, the effect definitely seems to be exactly on 0.834 HZ for some reason.


You used special equipment. That's what I would do too, build or buy the equipment that works when it's know what is required.

Mazzroth are you absolutly sure about this very narrow banded effect?? reproducible without doubt?
I see it as very uncommen that a human reaction/response can happen in such a small frequence band of +/-0.001Hz only.

Only if you are sure I will try and reproduce this effect you disccovered on my own. That would be the first and only more or less significant and reproducible outcome form AA's methothen so far.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:23 PM
link   
Ok I dloaded Brainwaive Generator and set the Hz to .834 sine wave and clicked play. to say the least I was amazed My wolfer started responding to a in and out beat, now mind you my tweeters made no noise but it is clearly there on my sub, probably vibrations from the speaker considering you should not be able to hear this.

NEEDLESS TO SAY I WAS WRONG AND AM MAN ENOUGH TO ADMIT IT!
I AM SORRY FOR FLAMING BEFORE I TRYED IT !

I'm not saying I agree with the fullity of the post as of yet but I have an open mind and gave it the benifit of the doubt and will continue with your experiment.

For referance I have a SB Audigy 2 ZS A400 sound card with Cambridge sound works speakers.

AlBeMeT



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:25 PM
link   
Yea, I'm starting to think there might be something to this.

Sorry to anyone I "flamed". I'm open minded now.


JSR

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dracotic
Yea, I'm starting to think there might be something to this.

Sorry to anyone I "flamed". I'm open minded now.


there is something to this.
as metioned in a previous post, this technique was created by the Monroe Institute.

but, not for alien comm.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by JSR
as metioned in a previous post, this technique was created by the Monroe Institute.

but, not for alien comm.


Link please?


Mod Note: Trim Those Quotes - Please Review this link



[edit on 14-12-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]


JSR

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by AlBeMet
Link please?


oh for heaven sake.....

give a bit to find it.


Mod Note: Trim Those Quotes - Please Review this link



[edit on 14-12-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]


JSR

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:38 PM
link   
www.new-mind.com...

here ya go.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:39 PM
link   
JSR,

Do you mind posting link.

Thanks,

AA


JSR

posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alien Agenda
JSR,

Do you mind posting link.

Thanks,

AA


your very welcome aa

where did you find your technique, if you dont mind me asking?



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by AlBeMet
Ok I dloaded Brainwaive Generator and set the Hz to .834 sine wave and clicked play. to say the least I was amazed My wolfer started responding to a in and out beat, now mind you my tweeters made no noise but it is clearly there on my sub, probably vibrations from the speaker considering you should not be able to hear this.


As much as I know Brainwave is useing TWO tones to generate the one tone of desire and not one. What setting did you use?



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:58 PM
link   
The exact frequecy and techniqe came through the leaning viewer a few nights ago.

As you progress the pieces will fall into place.

AA





 
1
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join