It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien Communication and the Evolution Homo Sapiens IS Now Underway

page: 15
1
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Emily, I posted a link for a tone generator and a tone file a page or two or three ago...

By the way, I believe AA to be of sound mind. How he can post in the Alien & UFOs section and come under attack for claiming to be in contact with aliens is beyond me. Given that, attacks on him are tantamount to going to an AA meeting and harassing someone for admitting to be an alcoholic.

These are just words - no one's in any danger of AA's words leaping off of the page and attacking them.

I actually thought this was humorous,



g210b,
they are good behavior but everyones experience will be different.


AA never claimed scientific knowledge, per se, but only admitted to receiving information that falls under the scientific category.

It's like me receiving printed instructions on how to build a model car. I'm not a model car afficionado, but I have purportedly received instructions on how to build a model car. It's not the same as me claiming to be a model car expert. I'm just passing on what is written in the instructions I received.

Just because some aren't having experiences using AA's techniques doesn't mean others are not.

I WILL say that those that do have experiences seem to be having them rather immediately upon starting with a technique, so if you're trying these and not experiencing anything after a couple/few tries, you may consider discontinuing simply on the theory of diminishing returns...

Skeptics posting here misconstrue simple curiosity with blind allegiance. We aren't advocating so much for AA as much as AA's right to speak his mind here in any fashion he wishes (in accordance with the rules and T&C of ATS). That's why these boards are here, and in particular, the Alien & UFOs board.

Besides, how can you be following this thread without feeling curious where it's headed?

So many post experiences without a photograph to back up their claims, but here is someone who is not only offering several techniques, but is diligent with his threads, and through his own continuing efforts is offering further information and data. Skeptics could have only hoped for half this effort on behalf of an alleged experiencer, and AA is providing it...

Just stay tuned...And I'm not a "crony" of AA's. I treat everyone with the fairness and consideration with which I would hope to be treated in return. I'm an advocate for open and free exchange of information and a fair and equitable treatment of posters on this board.

BBQ pork rinds...*crunch* ...


[edit on 18-12-2006 by OnTheDeck]




posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 01:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alien Agenda
Hank,
Thanks for your contributions and continueal pesonal attacks on me and now the other posters.

You act like a dis information agent....

Back to walmart (...), you can still get the telescope special.

Wonder how long it takes for you mod buddy intreid to get involved.

AA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
deleted contentious word

[edit on 18/12/06 by masqua]


Not exactly sure what you took as a personal attack, I am just making observations to counter points that you brought up yourself. For someone with enlightenment and alien given I.Q., simple concepts seem to be beyond your grasp.

My post was not aimed at you, and your repsonse wasn't need, however it was expected. My post was aimed at those that view you with even a moderate bit of credibility, because frankly, if your methods dont prove measurable results, the only other thing that someone can measure IS your credibility. Do not mistake underminding your credibility as a personal attack, because there is no mallice in it.

Time and time again your credibility is in question, and in the lack of empirical evidence your credibility becomes the focus. You disregard scientific evidence, you scoff at psychological explainations. Do you claim to be more learned than everyone else in the world that has come before you? Do you read your own segmented thoughts as a whole and see how disconjoined it all is?

No, again, I say to you that this isn't a personal attack as much as it IS an attack on the credibility of the source of your information.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by OnTheDeck
I actually thought this was humorous,



g210b,
they are good behavior but everyones experience will be different.


AA never claimed scientific knowledge, per se, but only admitted to receiving information that falls under the scientific category.

[edit on 18-12-2006 by OnTheDeck]



Intital my intention was half humorous and half serious.
See, I just gave AA a valueable information in some way.
He could make use of this for the bad or the good way depends on his agenda.

I don't get it why you back up AA that much. We have still seen or read nothing that in anyway would support 'alien communication' or next lvl human or whatever he know called his second thread to avoid the 'proof positive' conflict. I think we all are very very patient here. Maybe a lot more than what is good for.

OTD, I thought you wanted to lay back and watch/read a little.



[edit on 18-12-2006 by g210b]



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Humm Hank,
You seem to have a short sighted memory and I quote:



What amuses me about AA's group of cronies and the resulting idiocy is the irony of it all.

It's funny that those that do not 'believe' that this is real are somehow the sheep and those that jump on the bandwagon and follow this pied piper are the enlightened ones.



Hank can you post personal attacks on me but calling folks posting real experiences on ATS cronies and sheep is a little disheartening coming from someone like you who has a memory span of one to two posts max bro.

You should attempt the exercises who knows maybe even you might learn something then again maybe not.

AA



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alien Agenda
Humm Hank,
You seem to have a short sighted memory and I quote:



What amuses me about AA's group of cronies and the resulting idiocy is the irony of it all.

It's funny that those that do not 'believe' that this is real are somehow the sheep and those that jump on the bandwagon and follow this pied piper are the enlightened ones.



Hank can you post personal attacks on me but calling folks posting real experiences on ATS cronies and sheep is a little disheartening coming from someone like you who has a memory span of one to two posts max bro.

You should attempt the exercises who knows maybe even you might learn something then again maybe not.

AA


Again, for someone with enlightenment and IQ, you dont have much of a grasp..

Cronies means friends.. If you are offended at being called friends with those that support you, I have no response to that. As for the SHEEP comment, if you reread the statement, I was calling those (including myself) that DONT believe you the sheep (hence the bit about irony.)

So, again, what were you actually offended by?


JSR

posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:20 PM
link   
mr AA

you are proving my assumtions, by avoiding your own topic of disscusion.

please,
back on topic.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Hey Hank, et al... Was wondering when you would chime back in...

Been casually observing this thread and others for the elusive "proof" and other profound claims of 'pathways' to the truth, etc. Haven's seen it so far. Been promised a few things - haven't seen those either. Plenty of excuses and some atrocious grammar, though. I've seen lots of that...

There's another thread brewing about "proof" of Aliens - implants this time (again). Was curious: AA - is there any connection/correlation between your gray pals and the ones who are conducting these implants?

Also: when you became, rather abruptly, "High IQ" - was there a bona fide psychological assessment done or do you just "feel" smarter. No disrespect, just wondering if your Higher IQ was 'achieved' or 'gifted' to you by your contacts, and if so, (since IQ, by definition, is a quantifiable measure) how you determined this is actually what had taken place?

I can accept, AA, your feeling of 'enlightenment', some special illuminating and profound 'message', guidance from aliens, etc. And I also accept that you are not claiming "proof" like the last color-squares thread that got slammed pretty hard (*ouch*). But some of us ultra-inquisitives are ready for a little more substance. Again, no offense, but we're witnessing a lot of mudsling, plenty of warm air, an interesting, entertaining story, perhaps. But not much substance.

If you're trying to gain converts, embrace believers, convince others, even just "help us see the light", maybe recruit a few to the 'light side', well, so far, after several months of posts, it's not coming together very well, is it?

How about kicking up the credibility quotient a notch or two? Any luck with that software program you were going to share with us? How about a few pictures, an algorithm, a single line of code? Any profound messages of wisdom from your alien buddies lately? Care to pass a few passages along to us lowly, unenlightened humans? I could use a little inspiration…

Anyway – thanks for hanging in there, AA. Your resilience shows a bit more tenacity than many other ATS OP material of late.

Looking forward to your next installment. Hope it’s not an epilogue submission…



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:37 PM
link   
I'm not in a position to attack anybody's experience with ETs because I have my own which I cannot prove with physical data.

So, I have to pretty much keep my mouth shut about it, or I get laughed out of the gallery.



Now I'll go looking for that new tone generator that I missed, first time through.

: ) Em



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Outrageo
Hey Hank, et al... Was wondering when you would chime back in...


I was bored and these threads are always good for a few chuckles. I have concluded that threads like this are beneficial in that it keeps the honest people honest, and it brings those of more dubious intent out of the woodpile.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 03:16 PM
link   
OntheDeck, I have searched through eight pages of text looking for the specific tone generator that you offered.

Guess, I'm just going right by it.

I see the concept of tone-training is more important than I even thought. I used to practice with Monroe's hemi-sync tapes and with a Shaman Machine, until I can tune in to most "natural" frequencies effortlessly.

This has enabled me to witness to a range of telepathic communications, which even now I must sift and sort through, to figure out who's who and what's what.

But it's very interesting, having the equivalent of radio stations, to turn to and to listen for familiar "content," even when there's no audible voice.

I think tone-training is essential and critical for our approach to the "sylphs" and "rods" that NASA has been photographing over the past twenty years. It's probably that "mind meld" is the only way we're ever going to be able to ciommunicate with them.

: ) Em



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 03:17 PM
link   
since you seem to be back.
where is this program you promised ?



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Page 8, just under the halfway point.

Here are the links again:

Tone Generator (free download)

Monotone .WAV File - .843Hz signal 810 seconds

I actually created my tone without filling in the .834Hz in the "Right" side indicated in the program.

I believe, I'm not sure, that my tone may have been monotone, but when I increased the tone so it was one I could hear it was very clear, and full sounding, so I don't think that makes a diff.

Good luck!

Hi!

*crunch*



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 03:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by EmilyCragg
Mirthful Me,

I believe some Aliens utilize tonal communication, just as whales and dolphins do.

Tone-training is quite essential for telepathic receptivity.

I didn't believe this is off-topic, not at all.

What is your beef, with this line of thinking?

: ) Em


The post I made was a general "back on topic" post directed towards all participants, as the staff of ATS must do from time to time. Any perception that your post was off topic is/was purely your own, and can only reflect your true intent. In the future, please refrain from posting in response to staff admonitions; if you really have a need to communicate, the U2U system is a wonderful tool.

Your mulligan has been used.

To all participants, please post on topic, and within the Terms & Conditions that you agreed to when you became an ATS member.

Thanks.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Again, for someone with enlightenment and IQ, you dont have much of a grasp..

Cronies means friends.. If you are offended at being called friends with those that support you, I have no response to that. As for the SHEEP comment, if you reread the statement, I was calling those (including myself) that DONT believe you the sheep (hence the bit about irony.)

So, again, what were you actually offended by?



Hank please stop trying to sabotage the thread, its quite clear you are just looking for an argument (made obviouse by your willingness to argue about grammatical errors and many other off topic isues)

you may think this thread is complete bollocks, which you have every right to do, if so, just stay out. You should not bring it upon yourself to abuse everyone whose thinking does not line up with yours, your opinion isn't the only one that counts.

You made your point about 20 posts ago (in the previous thread). Since then it's just been the same negative crap.


can we get back on topic?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trimmed triple nested quote

[edit on 18/12/06 by masqua]



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by lbennie
Hank please stop trying to sabotage the thread, its quite clear you are just looking for an argument (made obviouse by your willingness to argue about grammatical errors and many other off topic isues)


AA, by his complete unwillingness to provide evidence, is the one that makes his credibility the point of contention. By making claims of superb enlightenment and higher IQ, he opens himself to increased scrutiny in the absense of any type of measurable phenominon.

All we know of AA is what he presents of himself. While in some instances cheap shots like grammar and spelling seem petty, but when the person is making claims of other worldly knowledge you have to start looking behind the curtain to see who is controlling the wizard.

Am I truly trying to sabotage the thread? If by calling into question everything that is being said and questioning the source, then maybe I am. I would offer this in counter to that, it is sabotaging the entire study of ufology, parapsychology, and metaphysics to let BASELESS claims like this to gain any type of traction on the minds of the impressionable and gullable masses that are looking for an escape from their humdrum lives.

If my posts had been offtopic, I would have been reprimanded. The fact that I have NOT been proves that others seem to think I am on topic, and that my posts here have some merit.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 05:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Am I truly trying to sabotage the thread? If by calling into question everything that is being said and questioning the source, then maybe I am. I would offer this in counter to that, it is sabotaging the entire study of ufology, parapsychology, and metaphysics to let BASELESS claims like this to gain any type of traction on the minds of the impressionable and gullable masses that are looking for an escape from their humdrum lives.

If my posts had been offtopic, I would have been reprimanded. The fact that I have NOT been proves that others seem to think I am on topic, and that my posts here have some merit.



you don't sound like a person that smiles very often, but anyways...

its quite obvious that some people are enjoying the thread, yet you seem to be on some crusade to instill your opinion on others.

people want to hear what AA has to say, and your just getting in the way with your annoying negative attitude. Youve stated your opinion now move on.

The person that started this thread wishes to continue it, and im very interested to see how it developes.

you seem to be very agenda driven, highlighted by your calling out of spelling mistakes, which have nothing to do with the topic you are arguing (whatever that may be at the time)

sit back man, take a valium. you dont need to protect us all from this. I'm quite capable of thinking for myself thank you.

Mod Note: Trim Those Quotes - Please Review this link

[edit on 18-12-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 05:54 PM
link   
Quantum Movement
The following video clip is an in engine clip of the Quantum Movement Engine in action using information provided by “amoungus”. Before I go in-depth to what’s happening in this video please respond by what you see feel and sense.
I have provided two links below one for the audio and the other is the engine. I have had allot of difficulties trying to capture the sound with the screen capture lots of issues so I decided to post them both separately. You need to start the audio and the video at the same time if possible they should be in synch.

Quantum Audio

Quantum Video

WARNING: You are about to open a direct line to the grays please proceed with EXTREME open mindedness. Do not and I repeat do not go at this with a half baked attitude, this engine is EXTREMELY powerful; built and programmed with advanced techniques including audio embedded with mind awakening techniques from direct ALIEN contact.
Please just remain calm and open because they will reach out and touch some of you.

AA


[edit on 18-12-2006 by Alien Agenda]



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 05:57 PM
link   
still waiting for the link to the computer program AA
whats taking so long?
you can email me the source code ill do it myself and i wont sell it to anyone...

or just give me the link

on and your above links dont work.

[edit on 18-12-2006 by thedangler]



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 06:39 PM
link   
Hank: Don't be discouraged. You're doing a great job IMO.

AA: really want to try this but the links are not working. I will try it as soon as they are up! I too have gotten to the "stream" but through different approaches.



posted on Dec, 18 2006 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedangler

on and your above links dont work.

[edit on 18-12-2006 by thedangler]


keep trying them, they do work, its just his webserver is getting hammered, which backs up my claim that there are many people interested in the development of this thread.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join