It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Possibly a reflection.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Anok...when the first tower fell, it was leaning as you pointed out. Several videos show the core was still standing for several seconds after the exterior collapsed...could the core some how "guided" the collapse at the beggining? Keep it from falling over....?? ( i realize this is way above my head here...)
Originally posted by ANOK
When the SOUTH TOWER toppled the whole section, including the core was toppling, or tilting if you prefer. No the core could not do that, common sense should tell you how that's not possible.
When the tower started to collapse it was moving faster than the top tilting section, notice how the top straightens up as the building bellow it collapses.
The top should have continued in it's path, there was NOTHING to cause it to change it's mind other than the building being blown from under it. There was no damage from bellow the impact point to the ground, so how did it fall? NIST claims gravity, well you can see because the top was tilting it didn't have the energy to crush the undamaged floors, thus the official story is a lie. Prove me wrong!!!!! Or join the side of the truth, if you do neither then all the accusation aimed at you must be true.
BTW You've got to understand the whole official story is a lie and a sham, so when people do nothing but spout the official story with no research of their own, then you have to take what comes...
Originally posted by ANOK
^The point isn't that you disagree with me, it's that a very important part of the whole collapse mechanism is basically ignored by the official story.
And when the question comes up, you all run and dance around trying to avoid answering it.
Sry but your explanation doesn't cut it. And asking for a peer reviewed paper just shows me you either have no clue about physics, so how can you be so sure the official story is true? If you do know about physics then you're just playing ignorant, which my friend we have seen many times here at ATS.
You are NOT looking for the truth because again you are just trying to find excuses to appease me, if you really wanted the truth then the fact that you can't explain what happened should make you go hmmmmm. You cannot explain the toppling turning into a vertical collapse using the theory of the official version, even though you are trying to do that NOT find what really happened. Your dismissive attitude gives you away dude.
You say you've done your research, what does that mean? You've looked at the NIST report and pro 9-11 sites to get the stock answers to our queries?
Cause that's all I've heard so far...
[edit on 29/12/2006 by ANOK]