Syracuse Woman Spits In Soldier's Face, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 9-12-2006 @ 01:24 PM by marg6043
Originally posted by jsobecky

So could you, marg, so I don't really know what you are trying to defend here. Esp. when you're always so proud of your husband's service to his country.



Very simple, JS, something that you have not seen . . .

How this story has brought a part of human nature that brings only the negative part of one and each of us.

While some are very clear on the dislike of the woman in question . . . for her actions. . . if this has been done on a none military . . . would it have made it into the news and on this thread? JS.

Now what it bothers me and I believe it should raise concerns on others isThis type of sentiment when somebody post about having some type of violent action . . . against the woman in question. . . that. . . comes to mind.

That I find it very wrong and troublesome, Don't you JS? But I also find wrong her actions, but by no means I will advocate for her demise or corporal punishment.

What are we going to end up doing next? start killing each other and calling for the demise of other American citizens because we disagree?

Now going back to the topic in question

I will like to have more information on the incident, because I don't know about you JS . . . but is sounds kind of weird that she before spiting on the soldier in question. . . .

Why did she walk to the soldier and asked him if he was from Fort Drum and them spit on him .

What is so special about been from that particular place?

Does anybody knows, for what I see is something that trouble the woman about that particular place and perhaps She could very well be a nut case.


reply posted on 9-12-2006 @ 05:37 PM by hotpinkurinalmint
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
This thread brings up an interesting issue of how much personal responsibility soldiers should take for the blunders of the US government. I am not saying that people should spit on soldiers or that every US soldier has murdered or otherwise directly harmed innocent Iraqis, but we should question whether they are truly blameless. On one hand, many soldiers do not approve of the USA's blunders in Iraq, so they should not be personally blamed for incidents like Abu graib or the killings in Haditha. Many are serving in Iraq against their will and would not serve if they had the option. On the other hand, "just following orders" is not a valid excuse.

Your thoughts?


Well, since the soldiers usually come from poor social classes, often to protect those of your ilk and are then betrayed by the very people they are sent to protect, no they arent blameless. They shouldnt be so willing to give their lives for a group of people who would not fight for their country even were it absolutely necessary.



You make some good points, although you would be hard pressed to find someone who is critical of the US military or its personnel when it fights wars that are absolutely necessary. It is a shame though, that people are enlisting because going to Iraq is the most lucrative option in their life. We can point fingers at big corporations for creating this situation by outsourcing good jobs and encouraging BS wars, but ultimately we support these corporations. We drive around in oversized SUV's, buy cheap foreign goods rather than shell out a little extra for goods that are made in America, and vote for politicians that allow it all.

Soldiers as a group can be blameworthy in that they do not do enough to speak up. Not enough soldiers are criticizing the president for putting their lives at risk so Halliburton can have a boondoggle. Too many soldiers and their families are supportive of the administration. Perhaps it is because it is difficult to come to the realization that your life or the life of someone important to you means less to the political leaders you admire than someone's stock portfolio. People need to wake up and make this realization. Soldiers are not bad people because George Bush and company would rather see them killed than for Halliburton to actually make a profit by going out and competing in the private sector free market, George Bush and company are the bad people. Soldiers have to realize this and speak up.


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 06:29 AM by Damocles
no, i commend the soldier for his restraint, but this type of thing isnt isolated anymore. anyone remember the thread about the soldier up in wash state that got attacked (allegedly?)

here in monterey a small group of soldiers were downtown at the bar one night and got harrassed, they dealt with it and kept enjoying their night. as their group dwindled to two one of them went to the latrine and the last one standing alone in the bar the group came back and beat on him, out of no where comes a baseball bat. kid ended up in ICU for several days.

the sad part is that if he had really injured one of them defending himself someone woulda tried to press charges against him because he's "trained" or some such BS.

ive been out for a couple years but my wife is in...someone assaults her and watch how fast my walking stick becomes a quarter staff and i dont care how long they wanna try to lock me up. 12 years sworn to defend these morons but ive sworn my life to my wife and ill be damned if someones gonna get to her for doing what she feels is right.

but thats just me.

oh, and while i do think it was a bad idea to put her address in the article, if her name was there its a short flip to the phone book to find her if someone was so inclined...but ill think its really sad if anyone did anything to this woman. she has a right to express herself, but spitting one somene is technically assault. if she had spit on an FBI agent or cop she'd have gotten charged with a felony...why should a soldier be any different?

or hell a firefighter, teacher, avg joe.

just my opinion, take it or leave it


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 06:40 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by marg6043
Giving away her address violating her privacy means nothing to any of you for what I see.


I have absolutely no problem with her address being given out. It is her own fault that she called attention to herself. Whatever happens ... she planted the seeds HERSELF.

BTW - giving out an address publically isn't a 'violation of her privacy'.

another BTW - SHE violated HIS right to not be harrassed and assaulted. SHE violated his right not to be spat upon.

Originally posted by BASSPLYR
hope people show up at her house wearing belaclavas (so they don't get in trouble)and spit in her face at random times and for no reason.


Think she'd learn her lesson? She sounds like a complete idiot. I doubt that she'd learn, but I think it couldn't hurt for her to get a taste of her own medicine. What a freak'n moron she is.

Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
how much personal responsibility soldiers should take for the blunders of the US government. I am not saying that people should spit on soldiers or that every US soldier has murdered or otherwise directly harmed innocent Iraqis, but we should question whether they are truly blameless.


How about how much CREDIT should the soldiers be getting for having LIBERATED Iraq from Saddam, his death squads, government sponsored mass murder, government sponsored mass rape, etc etc. How much CREDIT should the souldiers be getting for VOLUNTEERING to put their lives on the line to defend America and Americans? How much CREDIT should they be given for being SELFLESS and giving up a good chunck of their personal lives for the greater good?

It's a matter of CREDIT .. not blame.


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 09:00 AM by jsobecky
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by jsobecky

So could you, marg, so I don't really know what you are trying to defend here. Esp. when you're always so proud of your husband's service to his country.



Very simple, JS, something that you have not seen . . .

How this story has brought a part of human nature that brings only the negative part of one and each of us.

While some are very clear on the dislike of the woman in question . . . for her actions. . . if this has been done on a none military . . . would it have made it into the news and on this thread? JS.

It would not have made news if it were just two average citizens.

I can see where it has brought out negative responses, but I don't see how anyone could find anything positive to say about the lady, marg. Can you?

And it's human nature to have gut reactions. Who among us hasn't wanted to kill a child-murderer or similar? And I'm not putting this woman in the same category as a child murderer, but people have varying degrees of tolerance.

Now what it bothers me and I believe it should raise concerns on others isThis type of sentiment when somebody post about having some type of violent action . . . against the woman in question. . . that. . . comes to mind.

Yeah, but take it for what it is, marg. People exaggerate all the time - it doesn't mean they will actually do it. Their true actions, given the opportunity, would fall way short of their words.

If we believed everything we read here on ATS, we'd be in big trouble!

Why did she walk to the soldier and asked him if he was from Fort Drum and them spit on him .

What is so special about been from that particular place?

Does anybody knows, for what I see is something that trouble the woman about that particular place and perhaps She could very well be a nut case.

Probably no big mystery. Fort Drum isn't far from Syracuse, and that, other than the evening news on CNN, is probably this woman's only exposure to the military.

Marg, every time I disagree with you, I feel like I should put my arm around your shoulder and tell you that I don't mean to hurt your feelings. Why is that?


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 10:39 AM by 11Bravo
Still not one link to any credible source of an actual documented case of a Vietnam soldier being spit on?
Where is the evidence to back up these claims?

Its amazing how all these people say 'it happend to me' or 'it happened to my father' but there is not one bit of actual factual evidence.

I would like to apollogize for calling your belief an URBAN LEGEND, but I cant do that until you give me something, ANYTHING to go on, other than hear-say.

All Im asking for is one link to something other then a Blog.

YOur 'Vietnam vets were spit on' story would not hold up in any court.

And NO, its not just because I have never seen it happen. Its because every single Vietnam Vet I have talked to IN PERSON says that it didnt happen.

DOnt you think that if it DID happen, especially if it was as widespread as some of you seem to think it was, that there would be atleast ONE news story about it?

I mean seriously, if this did happen and now we cant find ANY RECORD of it, then there must be a conspiracy to hide the evidence right?

A conspiracy of great magnitude to cleanse all news sources, police records and historical documents of all references to Vietnam Vets being spit on?

Now Im sure some of you will keep believeing this myth, but as for me, I need a little more than unsubstantiated claims and hear-say. Besides, a conspiracy to cleanse all public records would be too vast to ever work, and there is no way they could remove all records of an event that some people think happend on a daily basis.








[edit on 10-12-2006 by 11Bravo]


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 11:02 AM by clearwater
Originally posted by marg6043

I will like to have more information on the incident, because I don't know about you JS . . . but is sounds kind of weird that she before spiting on the soldier in question. . . .

Why did she walk to the soldier and asked him if he was from Fort Drum and them spit on him .

What is so special about been from that particular place?

Does anybody knows, for what I see is something that trouble the woman about that particular place and perhaps She could very well be a nut case.


Good point, that's why there's a legal system and laws prohibiting publication of the addresses of accused.

For all we know her daughter was gang-raped by soldiers attending Fort Drum, heck - maybe he was one of them.

Knee-jerk assumptions and reflexive conclusions because of emotional feelings surrounding circumstance do not justify persecution.

Sounds like media opportunism to drum up unthinking responses in fear social ostracism.

The cruelty directed at the returning soldiers of Vietnam was against a back-drop of very active and vocal anti-war demonstrations and agitation.

People were burning their draft cards and actively recruiting people with the slogan 'What if they gave a war and noone came.'

Asking all citizens to take personal responsibility and just NOT PARTICIPATE in the war.

Those who did participate were not seen as just 'soldiers following orders' but active supporters of a self-serving and elitist dogma.

Today, there seems to be a greater assumption of learned helplessness in the consequence of government policy and further identification for those directly involved in the carrying out of said policies.

Or more than that, a passive acceptance of whatever social construct is thrown out in the CNN age.


reply posted on 10-12-2006 @ 11:35 AM by JackJuice
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Still not one link to any credible source of an actual documented case of a Vietnam soldier being spit on?
Where is the evidence to back up these claims?


I'm not sure how old you are but I would like you to know that the Internet hasn't been around forever, infact it is quite new to this world. They did not have the internet in the 70's infact they didn't even have personal computers and had to type up their news stories on type writers. Now you might be asking why I brought this up. Well, because of this, very few of the newspaper stories from that time period are digitized and on a computer. That means your not going to find the little link you think constitutes proof of anything.

Originally posted by 11Bravo
Its amazing how all these people say 'it happend to me' or 'it happened to my father' but there is not one bit of actual factual evidence.

I would like to apollogize for calling your belief an URBAN LEGEND, but I cant do that until you give me something, ANYTHING to go on, other than hear-say.

All Im asking for is one link to something other then a Blog.

YOur 'Vietnam vets were spit on' story would not hold up in any court.

And NO, its not just because I have never seen it happen. Its because every single Vietnam Vet I have talked to IN PERSON says that it didnt happen.

DOnt you think that if it DID happen, especially if it was as widespread as some of you seem to think it was, that there would be atleast ONE news story about it?

I mean seriously, if this did happen and now we cant find ANY RECORD of it, then there must be a conspiracy to hide the evidence right?

A conspiracy of great magnitude to cleanse all news sources, police records and historical documents of all references to Vietnam Vets being spit on?

Now Im sure some of you will keep believeing this myth, but as for me, I need a little more than unsubstantiated claims and hear-say. Besides, a conspiracy to cleanse all public records would be too vast to ever work, and there is no way they could remove all records of an event that some people think happend on a daily basis.
[edit on 10-12-2006 by 11Bravo]


I would also like to state that getting spit on, even soldiers, in the 1970's was not considered news worthy to the media of that era. You see they hadn't invented the 24 hours new networks yet. Also most vietnam vets would not want the public attention since they were already being lambasted in the media. Really how many soldiers would go and report to the news "Hey i got spit on" None. That doesn't mean it didn't happen.

You see we didnt have a public effort to protect the dignity of our soldiers back then as we do now. You know why we even have it now? Because of what happened with Vietnam. You can pretend what ever cute reality you want saying that you know so many vets that haven't been spit on. And I guarantee there are many that haven't been but I'm sure you went to every one of them too and asked them if they were humiliated in this way. Most importantly though it doesn't matter if it wasn't as wide spread as we all may believe and it probably isn't but what really matters is that it did happen and that these vets were treated VERY poorly and deserve your respect and gratitude. Questioning whether they were spit on or not really is a disgrace to what they have been through.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 119 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 66 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 42 replies