posted on Dec, 10 2006 @ 03:27 AM
Although you bring up a valid point- I believe it's half mistaken and this is why. You can make the argument that many countries having WMD's makes
warfare more complicated in that no one in their right mind wants to make a false move and step on anyone's toes. Countries without the Nuke don't
have as much power or say as the one with the Nuke. In a perfect world, no one should be allowed Nuclear technology. But you know what, the cats out
of the bag, and there's no going back now- at least not in our lifetimes.
However, that's irrelevant in itself and also if you apply it to the people. First, WMD's are a terrible way to ensure freedom. Why? Not only is
it absolutely insane for a militia group to attempt to obtain a weapon that can wipe our species off the map, but it is the last of the last of the
last of the options, and then still isn't good enough.
Nuclear weapons are the biggest threat to our survival, hands down. Nothing ever can come close to the destructive power of a Nuke (except the
elements, the force of Hurricane Katrina was roughly the same energy as 100,000 nuclear weapons? I read that somewhere).
WMD's like Saddam had with the Kurds doesn't scare these elitists. Freedom of mind and spirit scares these elitists. This is why there is such a
push to label the majority of the poplulation as insane, drug us up, put chemicals in our food, pump us full of anti-whatever drugs, and brainwash us
with propoganda on the internet, television, and newspapers.
The real fight is over truth and sanity.
So yes, I stick with my original statement: any group or militia that attempts to obtain a WMD should be executed.
Now further, we've established that it is ok constitutionally to have a militia and it is also ok to have firearms.
Next question, is it a state right to have a militia? And if so, is it a people's right to have a militia? This is a really big confusion for
Edit for comment: if you really want to ensure freedom, how about you disseminate what you believe to be the truth to all the police and military you
know, and not to follow illegal orders one day if that day comes. That's a strategy that can work. Not everyone can be swayed to the dark side, and
not everyone is a palpatine either. We're dealing in a small percentage of horrible people here.
And further, I really hope you don't mean what you say when you think it is ok for a militia or a related group to have a WMD to keep the bad boys in
check. Because even though I believe in freedom, 1776 freedom to be exact, and believe you bring up good points- if one day in the future the stuff
hits the fan... and if you're responsible for getting a weapon of mass destruction... expect death crgintx. Because on that day you'll be a
terrorist, and on that day you'll be jeopardizing the lives of millions. Is that really what you want? Is that really what you would want to
support? You need to watch the movie "The Rock" - Pay attention to the end when the general comes to his senses.
Defeating the battle against legitimate terror is a group effort. It's not just the police, military, and other groups- it a job everyone must band
together to accomplish.
I'm sorry, but saying it is ok for a militia to have an WMD is beyond insane. Please think deeply about the subject before you give such an
Also, you can make them just as paranoid by never picking up a hamburger again from McDonalds, saying no to psych meds, starting up an independant
newspaper and giving out free copies, or being happy and helping people. That's scarier to them than a horrible catastrophe. You know why? They
are comfortable with death. They are deathly terrified of happy people. It's pretty simple when you look at it for what it is.
[edit on 10-12-2006 by jaguarmike]