It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting -- UPDATE: Photos & Analysis

page: 81
99
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 07:39 AM
link   
And yet we've not heard of Any such "interception" of the O'Hare object, or any attempt to intercept the object, by air or ground vehicle.

This, despite the fact that the object is reported to have remained visible and relatively motionless for aproximately 15 minutes!?

Very curious behaviour on the part of the authorities IMO!




posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Well, true. But keep in mind. ATC never painted this object on radar. That's what triggers the intercept order. The intruder penetrates the Class-B boundary some 30miles out. This puppy just showed-up over the terminal and never appeared on radar. According to the 'official' story, ATC never saw the object --- on radar or otherwise. Despite this, some witnesses allege a significant military presence at ORD during the event. I'd love to know why they were there.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 07:53 AM
link   
Are we to understand then, that the airport authorities would be unlikely to even send a ground vehicle out to investigate Multiple verbal reports, from trained and responsible employees, of an on-going airspace intrusion?

Are we to belive that "If it don't show up on our radar, it doesn't exist as a possible threat"?

Is this the predominate mind-set in ATC's?

If so, from now on, I'm taking the Train!

[edit on 30-1-2007 by Bhadhidar]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 08:00 AM
link   
Obviously I can't say for sure but I'm guessing that the reasoning is: if we can't see it on radar it isn't solid and must be an illusion or weather phenomenon of some kind and therefore no threat to aircraft. It's certainly new ground for ATC and I'm sure there are no definined protocols for thsi sort of thing. A radar return, absolutely. But an 'object' without a radar return. Probably not. Snafu would know better than I.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 08:40 AM
link   
i apologize if this has already been pointed out
[align=center]
the 'sighting' or else the 'commotion' of photo evidence of a UFO all began on the 7th of November

"7-11"
[ also known as the winning #'s in a dice game known as 'Craps' ]

my guess is its an obvious prank, joke, which no-one has caught on to yet[/align]

~peace~



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:05 AM
link   
I didn't see this posted .. it might have been and I missed it .. but here it is ..

PILOT WITNESS to O'Hare UFO
1/2 hour UTUBE

www.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:08 AM
link   
We definitely cant say that this thing wasn't picked up on radar. The military was there with significance to this sighting. I believe someone picked it up and very well may have tracked it to ORD. The people in the tower knew to divert flights and keep them in a holding pattern which what I have found out in some cases were flights held in the air for close to an HOUR! DIG PEOPLE DIG!!!!


AS


ORB

posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:33 AM
link   

This is 00000000's cell phone pic with my interpretive highlighting in PhotoImpact
Enjoy



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:38 AM
link   
The two photos that were also posted on CASEBOOK were said to be already debunked. How did that come about? Also OIA is the Office of International Affairs which does have personal at Ohare.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:46 AM
link   
A Sinclair

You have mentioned the military presense several times. Can you expand of it.
Branches, vehicles, aircraft. Did you see them or are you just repeating things you have picked up through the grapevine?



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:48 AM
link   
people keep saying there was a significant military presense there. are we talking officers in uniform talking to airforce personel? or are we talking like every other major/minor airport in the country that on any given day has dozens of soldiers, sailors airmen and marines flying through it because almost no one fly's airforce transports anymore?

just wondering if anyone ever really bothered to make the distinction.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by A SINCLAIR
The two photos that were also posted on CASEBOOK were said to be already debunked. How did that come about? Also OIA is the Office of International Affairs which does have personal at Ohare.


Those two photos were debunked on this very forum (by jritzman i believe) He found the originals in an in depth Google search reversed and with no UFO



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:54 AM
link   
the two new photos also show a light coating of snow on the tarmac which on Nov 7th there was none.

So the two photo's had been reversed and taken on a different day



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 10:59 AM
link   
All I can really say is that it was from a very credible source. Yes there are always military personal at the airport but this was different and worth checking out if possible. What I can say with certainty is that the peole working in the tower that day know a lot more than they are saying. HOW do I know this? I know an ATC this person will not say much and definitely not say anything in public.

AS



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 11:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Eyewitness
Did you only find out about via sites such as this, or did it actually manage to get reported in your area/country?


There was mention of it here in Phoenix, but not too in depth. People around here are still pretty into UFO's since the '97 incident....



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by A SINCLAIR
All I can really say is that it was from a very credible source. Yes there are always military personal at the airport but this was different and worth checking out if possible. What I can say with certainty is that the peole working in the tower that day know a lot more than they are saying. HOW do I know this? I know an ATC this person will not say much and definitely not say anything in public.

AS


My take on this is that if there was a real object there, then it was truely unknown or at least not a US military craft. The airport is more in "hush" mode then "people seeing stuff again" mode. I suspect the authorities won't admit thay have no control over these situations.



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 11:42 AM
link   
From the anon forum:

"I'm surprised that the member thread isn't talking more about the obvious attempts to cover this up- but are talking more about things in the realm of conjecture, debunking photos, etc."

I think someone is trying to steer this thread from the anon thread. This whole thing reeks of Serpo. I just can't seem to figure out why.....what the goal of all this is? I also suspect quite a few sock puppets steering the hoax as well.

Peace



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Eyewitness
I have a question... since you folk are from all over the world (and the US, as well), can you tell us if the O'Hare sighting received any attention in your regional media? Did you only find out about via sites such as this, or did it actually manage to get reported in your area/country?


No unfortunately there is or was no news coverage here in the Netherlands. Although the matter is being discussed in Dutch UFO site, but that's about it. I don't know for the rest of Europe. I heard there was some coverage in the UK. Luckily we have great site like this!!!!

My feeling is that it wont get more attention than this, what we have now, even in the US media. I personally don't believe there are personal pictures of video's of this event. If there were, the would have been already circulated either in the media or internet. I don't believe that people are negotiating with the media about their pictures. It simply would not take that long. The event is almost 3 months ago.

If I would own a picture with a UFO on it, I would immediately go to the media and try to sell it and if they are not interested I would have placed it on the internet at sites like this. Come on...the first thing you want to do is share it.

Maybe I am wrong, I certainly hope that, but I cannot believe if it indeed happened ( have to say that the testimony from Eyewitness sound very real) , it would take that long. Its a good thing though that ATS is searching out loud for more witnesses or eventual pictures.

I also have a bad feeling a bit, because we had the Serpo Hoax and not to forget Aussie Bloke. And some more of course. But these are very fresh in my head and something tells me we go there again.

The more I think about it, the more I am afraid some people are behind this. Not the actual event, I think it happened. But something tells me there is a group behind this.

Don't forget how it started:

First we have a so called witness that dissapears after some questions about lies that he told....

than a few days later when things cooled down a bit, someone totally uknown post a picture, with almost no explenation.

Than there comes another picture, which immidiatly was clear it was a hoax.

Than there is another so called witness which says the pictures are fake and tries to point to a sketch which is very easy to say.

Then there is Eyewitness. I can nothing say about her, because everything sounds so real. I immediat believe it, becase it sound so real?

It feels to me a goup of people is giving injectetions to the story the whole time, so it will be continued being discussed and they laugh their teeth out.

I really hope this is real.



[edit on 30/1/2007 by rai76]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 12:13 PM
link   
I keep reading people comparing THIS to slurpo and aussiebloke...


I don't remember either of those getting the front page of the Chicago Tribune, on Fox News or any legit eyewitnesses (who we could actually TALK TO) coming forward.

If you can't stand or "get" the fact that this could be the event of the millenium that's cool, but for crying out loud find something closer to reality to compare it against.


Springer...

[edit on 1-30-2007 by Springer]



posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Springer
I keep reading people comparing THIS to slurpo and aussiebloke...


I don't remember either of those getting the front page of the Chicago Tribune, on Fox News or any legit eyewitnesses (who we could actually TALK TO) coming forward.

If you can't stand or "get" the fact that this could be the event of the millenium that's cool, but for crying out loud find something closer to reality to compare it against.


Springer...

[edit on 1-30-2007 by Springer]


But didn't we all felt that with at least Serpo? Look on how much time and place ATS gave to Serpo, because we hoped that this would be the 'event of
the millenium'.


I do believe the event happened and it is great that it received so much attention in the media. But I dunno what is happening here. But i'll continue to read the great post and investigation and hope the real truth comes out. And I really hope it will happen here, because everyone is taking so much time and effort here.

[edit on 30/1/2007 by rai76]



new topics

top topics



 
99
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join