It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eyewitness
When I fly, I've always packed my nondigital SLR and film in my checked luggage, to avoid clouding or other damage from the X-ray machines at security. Would owners of digital cameras likely do the same, or would there be no risk to memory cards and onboard-memory components?
Originally posted by Eyewitness
Bhadhidar, you're very right... I really didn't think my testimony was worth all that much until I realized that photos really weren't forthcoming, and that many witnesses are either airport/airline employees and may have been silenced, or are people who live overseas and may not even know of the attention this event has gotten.
As for ambassador, I think I'm mellow enough to handle pretty much anything including verrrry alien creatures... but do even ambassadors have to do the anal probe thing?? ;-)
Originally posted by roadgravel
Originally posted by Eyewitness
When I fly, I've always packed my nondigital SLR and film in my checked luggage, to avoid clouding or other damage from the X-ray machines at security. Would owners of digital cameras likely do the same, or would there be no risk to memory cards and onboard-memory components?
My understanding from research and friends who travel, is that there is not a problem with the xray scanners, etc. If I had a UFO photo on memory, I think I would hand carry it and have it hand inspected in camera if possible (plead concern of losing special family event photos).
Originally posted by Eyewitness
Absolutely agreed, roadgravel... I was thinking more about if people would be inclined to have their digital cameras handy, in their purses or briefcases or carryon bags, so the cams would be available to use if the people carrying them spotted the object, rather than tucked away in their checked baggage. As for me, now that I've got my new O'Hare-inspired digital camera, I will never, ever fly without it farther away than my pocket.
Originally posted by Springer
Those who are WASTING valuable attention "poo-pooing" the existing image off REALLY should be trying to get the PLEA for MORE DATA OUT to those who may have that data.
"Turf wars" are petty, MEANINGLESS and counter-productive, and we IGNORE THEM categorically here at AboveTopSecret. Matter of fact they SERVE the concept of a "cabal" that seeks to squelch data like this from ever reaching the PEOPLE! So who will we serve? The People or the wannabes?
Originally posted by bizone
i'm with you 100% on more data.
but i really wouldn't call debating the only possible legitimate picture a waste of time. that picture on it's own without this backstory would probably be laughed off. without someone claiming it's a photo of a UFO, it probably wouldn't gauge a second glance. add to the fact that it came from an anonymous source, and we have found a possible source picture, it makes a debate seem 100% necessary in my opinion.
the single photo by itself, real or hoaxed, doesn't do the incident justice one way or the other.
Originally posted by amongus
I must have missed Springers appearance on C2C tonight. . can anyone give bullet points as to what was said?
Originally posted by Eyewitness
JTF2-CANADA, lol, I know, I do listen once in a great while... but alas, I missed the two crazies.
Originally posted by Bhadhidar
Does any one know, or know some one who would know, what commercial airport (ANY large comercial aiport would do, but ORD-specifically would be Ideal) policy and procedures are regarding unauthorized intrusions of the airport's restricted airspace...