Just a note to all, my webspace bandwidth is nearly gone, so I've had to remove the images I been working on and posting here.
I'll have these all reposted soon as I can where I can. They are safe and sound on my harddrive. Most I think have already saved them or seen them,
so just gimme some time to work it out.
(I thought I'd posted this before but I'm exhausted and I may not have hit the post button....anyway, again...)
At any rate, this image is in conjunction with the circled differences between the UO shot and the congested shot overlay (which was erroring and is
This one is a FULL uncropped overlay of both shots. Now, what I did was line up the long tapered yellow/white object in both photos background,
towards the left. While we do not know what this object is, it is not a train as thought early on. It appears in a few other photos of this runway
unrelated to the UFO or congestion shot. We'll call this object "the tube"
You'll note the tube object doesnt move in either shot. Note the movement in the runway, the buildings, and especially the little white light on the
right side, which jumps like a jackrabbit. Remember what I said before, the distortion to me, progresses more the further we go right.
IF these were taken with the same camera, this wouldnt happen.
Now, I also asked "eyewitness" about the image where I overlayed the OHare labeled map with the Google Earth view of the airport, and where I
subsequently found the runway and the photographers location, and a rough approximation of where the UO was. I asked her based on her location, if
this is where she thought the UO would be whe she saw it. She remarked I had it pegged to that area "within a matter of feet". Thanx to her so much
for the patience ...again.
So, this begs the question: IF this is a hoaxed photo using congested as a composite layer as some jump to claim, despite all the differences shown,
how does a hoaxer pick a photo off the net to hoax a shot that coinsides with a witnesses' location of where the object was? A witness that wasnt
even known at the time?
The more that connects the more intrigued I am by it.
Bedtime for me. G'nite
[edit on 28-1-2007 by jritzmann]