O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting -- UPDATE: Photos & Analysis, page 66
Pages: <<  63    64    65    66    67    68    69  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 86 times


reply posted on 27-1-2007 @ 06:56 PM by Quasar
loam, the Congestion photo is not completely faded out.



reply posted on 27-1-2007 @ 08:17 PM by Eyewitness
Hi again... I sent the lovely, talented and ever so sweet jritzmann my best guestimate of my positions and the UFO's position, as well as takeoff direction, marked... will try to answer a few questions now.

UM Gazz, I thought they were getting ready to say hello right there and then.

fooffstarr, I thought that photo (the Dulles area cloud hole) was worth mentioning, too... verrrry similar, indeed, except that the ORD one was fairly straight up, and slightly angling towards me and left) --- the Dulles cloud hole seems nearly perpendicular to the ground. But suffice it to say, after what I saw at O'Hare, it wouldn't exactly shock me to discover that some-one? -thing? was snooping around yet another airport.

I didn't know about the Aurora, IL, sighting, also on 6 November... will try to look up information on that one, as either we had quite the little nomad on our hands that day, or the skies were a bit "friendlier" than usual.

MrPenny, I thought exactly the same thing, about people not knowing how to download phone photos to their computers, then how to upload from there to here. Most of my friends with cell cams tell me they have no idea as to how to do this. Again, I just encourage anyone who has photos from this incident to release them. Personal anonymity is fine, although I've felt completely safe about having my confidentiality maintained by the moderators here. Just please... figure out the way to upload them, or send them to Mr, Hilkovich at the Trib, or to Peter Davenport, or to the talented photo staff here, via the moderators. Please.

mythatsabigprobe, from my perspective and that of a few others who saw this object, we tend to feel more that the mainstream media are making a mole hill out of a mountain... and yours is my favorite nic here so far.

amongus, this isn't the first UFO I've seen, but this was certainly the most detailed and profound one... the others didn't make me rush out to tell my tale, but this one has brought me around to that. I'm open as to what may be piloting this craft... but that it was a craft I have no doubt whatsoever. And given that the take-off would, given our currently extrapolated technological level, pretty much turn a human's body to mush. I don't really think it was piloted by humans.

I did feel a brief, light tingling no more than a second or two before the thing took off and as it passed through the clouds ahead and tp the left of me, but it was such a subtle thing I can't say with certainty that it was a result of an electrical or EG phenomenon.

My flight crew friend said that they were not informed of the reason for the brief delay, but that someone did ask if they'd "seen anyything unusual." The crew was not questioned by FAA or airline officials, but again, at that time I doubt if damage control had gone beyond the ramp areas and runways.

I'll stay around here for a few hours to answer questions, if you have them.


reply posted on 27-1-2007 @ 08:26 PM by SkyWay
[ats] img293.imageshack.us...[/ats]

One of the things that I find rather revealing from the apparent coincidental alignment of the two photos is that whoever was controlling the ufo placed it right in the corridor that was being used by planes that were landing. No wonder some of those flights were kept in a holding pattern. If the ufo was intelligently controlled then whoever was controlling it could have positioned it in an area where it would not have obstructed the planes landing at O'hare. There is alot of room to position a ufo that is just hovering but out of all that space it had to hover right in the lane used for landings. It seems like a deliberate disruption of operations at the airport. That says something about the occupants of the ufo and not just the object itself.


reply posted on 27-1-2007 @ 08:32 PM by bizone
Hi, I've been lurking here for a while... Sifting through much of the debate and observations. I just wanted to reply and point out how ridiculous the analysis of the "congestion" photo is. i finally joined, feeling to compelled to argue this.

Originally posted by jritzmann



How can you possibly look at this comparison shot and come to the conclusion that it is not derived from the same original image? It would be virtually impossible for two people to randomly take that shot twice with the exact same composition. the fact that we have the same exact congestion (6 plane lights) visible on both pictures is enough to close the book on that photo for me.

the reason you see slight varients between the two photos is because of compression. do i need to go into detail on what file compression is? the "swelling" and color varients pointed out are exactly what happens during photo compression.. it's also worth noting that compression would help hide any unnatural alterations done to the photo.

if you cannot see the UFO photo is the same as the congestion, you need to adjust your monitor.

i'm not debunking the indicent, only the photo.
Pages: <<  63    64    65    66    67    68    69  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags