It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting -- UPDATE: Photos & Analysis

page: 52
99
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Thanks, I looked at map quest. So was the object to the southeast by runway 27L or was it farther up nearer the terminals?

I quit asking and listen now.




posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 10:59 PM
link   
You guys are idiots?
Once again, could you give us a link or a description of that download (photo) you referred to?
thanks



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by roadgravel
Thanks, I looked at map quest. So was the object to the southeast by runway 27L or was it farther up nearer the terminals?

I quit asking and listen now.


I was heading north, and the object was to the north-west, over the terminal buildings.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Palasheea
You guys are idiots?
Once again, could you give us a link or a description of that download (photo) you referred to?
thanks


Can't find it now.

I'll give a look for it though. It was a link leading to image on a download site.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots
Would it be possible for the mods to change my name. Please change it to anything else. It was picked in the heat of the moment, and I regret it.


Actually, I kinda like your name. It will easily catch someone's attention. It will be the MOD's call anyway.


[edit on 25-1-2007 by searching_for_truth]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots

Originally posted by Palasheea
You guys are idiots?
Once again, could you give us a link or a description of that download (photo) you referred to?
thanks


Can't find it now.

I'll give a look for it though. It was a link leading to image on a download site.


This is the post


Originally posted by NOBODY_1
www.sharebigfile.com...

Its a download 100% safe debunker time.


Removed all caps, thanks to Intrepid for screening and providing image from the link. (the download wasn't working for me)

[edit on 1-25-2007 by worldwatcher]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots
I was heading north, and the object was to the north-west, over the terminal buildings.


Were you on the southern side of the airport at this time? Can ya give me any nearest cross street?

Thanx much.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:07 PM
link   
A lot of people thought that particular picture was suspect because it had lights on it, and was near identical to the China UFO CGI hoax of a few months ago.

So is that really what you saw?



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by jritzmann

Originally posted by You guys are idiots
I was heading north, and the object was to the north-west, over the terminal buildings.


Were you on the southern side of the airport at this time? Can ya give me any nearest cross street?

Thanx much.


Yes, I was on the southern side. Cross street? I was on the airfield. The closes public intersection would be Irving Park + Mannheim.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by fooffstarr
A lot of people thought that particular picture was suspect because it had lights on it, and was near identical to the China UFO CGI hoax of a few months ago.

So is that really what you saw?



Very similar. But you're right about the lights. I did not see any. Once again though, it was overcast skies and I was a fair distance away.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots
Yes, I was on the southern side. Cross street? I was on the airfield. The closes public intersection would be Irving Park + Mannheim.


Were you past Irving Park or coming up on it when you saw the object?
(Sorry I'm just trying to find a specific area to correlate)



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:11 PM
link   
Oh, ok.... thanks for posting that link!




[edit on 25-1-2007 by Palasheea]



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:11 PM
link   
I think I follow you. You were driving near the road, but the object was actually over the terminals, not actually the road.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:12 PM
link   
After 11 long hours at work, what better way to unwind than read 20 pages of posts on this topic!

Again, great work with people actually SPENDING TIME to look into this before just saying "it's real" or "it's a hoax."

Might as well toss my two lincolns in to the ring at this point as well.

To me the most obvious explanation is that the pic is REAL. Now what it's depicting ... I personally think a water droplet. This explanation just makes the most sense. I would say hoax, but why take the time to change the occular distortion as well as remove the lights AND change one "light spot" on the runway in addition to editing the sky? Makes no sense to me even if it IS easily done. And I can't claim it to be a UFO because it appears that water droplets on glass look VERY similar to this.

I think we can all agree that it would be easy to edit, and that the exif data is useless for determining if a photo has been edited. The truth is that there is no way we will EVER know if this is a UFO pic unless more people come forward. There is not going to be disclosure of any event of this magnitude without hardline evidence AND eyewitness testimony from MULTIPLE people that can back up the evidence.

So I will continue to read this thread but I will not offer anymore advice/insight because at this point, without 0000000 coming back to discuss it, I've filed it under the "eh, who knows" category.

There is just too much about this event for it to not have actually taken place in my mind. THEN AGAIN ... I have yet to hear one eyewitness testimony STRAIGHT FROM THE PERSON'S MOUTH ON CAMERA. No names. Nothing other than the words of some reporters and that there was a supposed "weather phenomenon" by the powers that be. Something still doesn't smell right here ... I just don't know what it is ...



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots

Originally posted by fooffstarr
A lot of people thought that particular picture was suspect because it had lights on it, and was near identical to the China UFO CGI hoax of a few months ago.

So is that really what you saw?



Very similar. But you're right about the lights. I did not see any. Once again though, it was overcast skies and I was a fair distance away.


OK, thanks for that.

Just some words of warning as well: You are guaranteed to cop some flak from some members here in relation to seeing this object, and you will be basically interrogated until we verify your story, so i apologize in advance for that. Just tough it out and answers any questions truthfully and you'll be fine.

It is just fair skepticism, and i'm sure you can understand the position we are in with this story being a major news piece and this forum in particular being broadcast over the world on Radio. We have to verify any sources we come across. I wish you luck



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Palasheea
Is this the image?



no.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by fooffstarr

Originally posted by You guys are idiots

Originally posted by fooffstarr
A lot of people thought that particular picture was suspect because it had lights on it, and was near identical to the China UFO CGI hoax of a few months ago.

So is that really what you saw?



Very similar. But you're right about the lights. I did not see any. Once again though, it was overcast skies and I was a fair distance away.


OK, thanks for that.

Just some words of warning as well: You are guaranteed to cop some flak from some members here in relation to seeing this object, and you will be basically interrogated until we verify your story, so i apologize in advance for that. Just tough it out and answers any questions truthfully and you'll be fine.

It is just fair skepticism, and i'm sure you can understand the position we are in with this story being a major news piece and this forum in particular being broadcast over the world on Radio. We have to verify any sources we come across. I wish you luck


Thanks for the warning. I really don't have anything more to contribute about the object. What I can say though, If I saw what I thought I saw, it looked nothing like that 0000 pic that's been circulating.



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots

Originally posted by Palasheea
Is this the image?



no.


Wow! That's the photo that's at that link. Maybe they changed the photo. hmmm



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by You guys are idiots
Thanks for the warning. I really don't have anything more to contribute about the object. What I can say though, If I saw what I thought I saw, it looked nothing like that 0000 pic that's been circulating.


I'm confused now...

You linked to that picture and identified it as the thing you saw, and then when someone posted it and asked you again you said 'no'...?



posted on Jan, 25 2007 @ 11:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Palasheea

Originally posted by You guys are idiots

Originally posted by Palasheea
Is this the image?



no.


Wow! That's the photo that's at that link. Maybe they changed the photo. hmmm


They didn't. I've got it saved from when the link was first posted. It is the exact same image



new topics

top topics



 
99
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join