Originally posted by Springer
PLEASE stop posting whole quotes of previous posts.

It makes for hard reading and it unnecessarily stresses the database. Select the portion you wish to address and quote that ONLY.

Thanks...

Springer...

Thank you.... I was about to say the same thing

Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
I'm going to go ahead and call your bluff on this one then tough guy. SHOW US THE EXACT URL of where you allegedly found this hoaxed photograph and we will see the date in the directory of when that picture was added, so don't try covering your trail and adding it now to a private web server of your own. Show us right now where you got that picture, the exact URL. If you are able to do this and show that it is a picture you genuinely found on google or on the net somewhere then you will have been exonerated and will receive my full apologies, but if you are unable to do this or suddenly go into hiding as I suspect you will, then only one logical conclusion can be made: you hoaxed that photograph yourself using photoshop and tried in earnest to pass it off as real.
The clock is ticking, what will you do?

Here is the earlier post where I asked that question, the photo was posted about halfway down the thread....

EDIT: oops, already posted, sorry all

[edit on 24-1-2007 by 27jd]

well i went to that photobucket page, and I did not see the pic unarmed posted in that photobucket account

Originally posted by l0rds0fcha0s
well i went to that photobucket page, and I did not see the pic unarmed posted in that photobucket account

Would you please read again what I've been writing?

I said it is the 11th post. And this post links to imageshack.

Just wondering but after the hoaxer photoshoped that image, do think maybe he then took a photo of this image showing on his computer moniter with his cellphone so that on analysis even in an editor, one would be able to see those surface artifacts typical of photo's taken with low quality cams?

I think the hoaxer even went as far as doing this to make the image look more authentic.

Originally posted by Palasheea
Just wondering but after the hoaxer photoshoped that image, do think maybe he then took a photo of this image showing on his computer moniter with his cellphone so that on analysis even in an editor, one would be able to see those surface artifacts typical of photo's taken with low quality cams?

I think the hoaxer even went as far as doing this to make the image look more authentic.

funny idea

at least it shows that some people here have a great imagination.

but anyway...i'll try that on my own and post the results...we'll see...

Jritz congratz I voted you way above (I rarely vote anyone)

In fact there are probably many shots from that perspective watching the landing "air stacking" fitting that two images capture incoming aircraft at the same positioning in the landing pattern. Great work on the overlay animation.

While the ufo incident did happen the photo presented by 0000000 is just a normal photo on airtraffic aligned with that runway.

There were no reports of the ufo being in the landing pattern so while the picture is in fact real, its presentation as stating it is a photo of the ufo on Nov 7th is false

Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
OK I now see that I was in error so I will live up to my words and go ahead and apologize to user "unarmed": I am sorry because now I see you did provide a link where you allegedly found the hoaxed picture.
You should have made it a bit clearer though in the beginning, the way you posted it seemed pretty strange, you should have said where you obtained the photo right from the start not 2 pages later, but either way once again I am sorry and you have hereby been vindicated.

No problem I will do a search in the future and provide a link before posting it.

[edit on 24-1-2007 by unarmed]

Originally posted by AgainstSecrecy
"Why is the TRUTH a "bad excuse"?"
Who says this is the ultimate truth? you? c'mon...

"I gaurentee you there's at least one program out there that creates or changes tags in digital pictures."
You can surely name that program...right?

"Everyone else accepts the picture as a real one , you're the one lingering.

Why are you so adamant on prooving that picture a fake?"
Why should i go with the herd? i don't belong to any herd...


just read my sig.

[edit on 24-1-2007 by AgainstSecrecy]

Dude, the picture Jr. posted is a graphic of air congestion at O'Hare?
I dont suppose that it occured to you that the original picture that 00000 posted was actually of a plane coming in.

One thing that people are forgetting in this thread I think is that O'Hare is an AIRPORT. There are things flying around all the time!

As for the original picture, I think theres an 85% chance of this either being a hoax or just a plane.

Oh, and Jr. gets Way Above from me as well.

There was talk about the military being there during the sightings around Chicago soon after New Years. I just think it's one piece of information that deserves greater looking into as it is much easier to get answers pertaing to that hen there are to questions about UFOS. If you can establish a significant uncalled for millitary presence during the sighting times then you can add one more ingrediant to this great event lending even more credibility. The other thing is that accordint to the paper (Tribune) which ran a floow up article last week, there were some flights that were kept in a holding pattern for about an hour over Chicago that were suppose to land at the time of the sighting. This should also be easy or easier to verify. What do you think? My friends in the media including 2 anchors seem to be out of the loop on this and my camera man friend seriously knows nothing more than what is on the internet. All three feel that this story has real legs.

AS

[edit on 24-1-2007 by A SINCLAIR]

I would suspect that mickey martian now has a new/second ATS name. The photo was most likely uploaded from ATS last night. A hoaxer would surely not post the pic here and on his photobucket acount, or pass it to someone to upload here as the pic received from "a person who got a pic of the ufo".

Here is a map I have been viewing.

www.ohare.com/images/cnrc/ohare/ord_alay.gif

It shows buildings and the surrounding area, with train tracks, etc.

The runways are to the north of the main complex. Hard to tell which way the planes are landing in the picture (from northwest or southeast)

Don't know if it will help.