It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
PLEASE stop posting whole quotes of previous posts.
It makes for hard reading and it unnecessarily stresses the database. Select the portion you wish to address and quote that ONLY.
Thanks...
Springer...
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
I'm going to go ahead and call your bluff on this one then tough guy. SHOW US THE EXACT URL of where you allegedly found this hoaxed photograph and we will see the date in the directory of when that picture was added, so don't try covering your trail and adding it now to a private web server of your own. Show us right now where you got that picture, the exact URL. If you are able to do this and show that it is a picture you genuinely found on google or on the net somewhere then you will have been exonerated and will receive my full apologies, but if you are unable to do this or suddenly go into hiding as I suspect you will, then only one logical conclusion can be made: you hoaxed that photograph yourself using photoshop and tried in earnest to pass it off as real.
The clock is ticking, what will you do?
[link to img92.imageshack.us] link to another picture --link to story [link to www.chicagotribune.com]
Originally posted by l0rds0fcha0s
well i went to that photobucket page, and I did not see the pic unarmed posted in that photobucket account
Originally posted by Palasheea
Just wondering but after the hoaxer photoshoped that image, do think maybe he then took a photo of this image showing on his computer moniter with his cellphone so that on analysis even in an editor, one would be able to see those surface artifacts typical of photo's taken with low quality cams?
I think the hoaxer even went as far as doing this to make the image look more authentic.
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
OK I now see that I was in error so I will live up to my words and go ahead and apologize to user "unarmed": I am sorry because now I see you did provide a link where you allegedly found the hoaxed picture.
You should have made it a bit clearer though in the beginning, the way you posted it seemed pretty strange, you should have said where you obtained the photo right from the start not 2 pages later, but either way once again I am sorry and you have hereby been vindicated.
Originally posted by AgainstSecrecy
"Why is the TRUTH a "bad excuse"?"
Who says this is the ultimate truth? you? c'mon...
"I gaurentee you there's at least one program out there that creates or changes tags in digital pictures."
You can surely name that program...right?
"Everyone else accepts the picture as a real one , you're the one lingering.
Why are you so adamant on prooving that picture a fake?"
Why should i go with the herd? i don't belong to any herd...
just read my sig.
[edit on 24-1-2007 by AgainstSecrecy]
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
Here is the apparently unprotected photobucket account with the photo s116.photobucket.com...¤t=ufoohare.jpg .
Originally posted by HankMcCoy
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
Here is the apparently unprotected photobucket account with the photo s116.photobucket.com...¤t=ufoohare.jpg .
s116.photobucket.com...
Not sure if this means anything, but this picture was posted in the Paranormal forum a few weeks ago. It is from the same photobucket account. I am currently looking for the exact thread it was posted in and will post it when I find it.
Here is the thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The thread was by Mickey Martian, and the picture in the thread is linked to the same photobucket account.. hmmm..
[edit on 24-1-2007 by HankMcCoy]
Originally posted by jritzmann
I wouldnt say it's that high yet. Lets see what more we can find out. We really need a map of the airport with labeled gates.