Curious Waveform
Though it's a few pages back now, I wanted to address some statements from an
earlier post that leave me with more questions than answers.
Originally posted by cheepnis
Whether atmospheric phenomenon, mass airline worker hallucinations or Unidentified Flying Object, ignoring something like this would seem
contrary to the mission of the FAA.
They've hardly ignored it.
Perhaps "ignore" is the wrong word, since they have apparently given an official opinion that it was either an optical illusion or atmospheric
phenomenon, depending on who you ask and when.
So let's replace "ignoring" with "summarily dismissing" and acknowledge that the point still stands that safety is part of their mission.
Overstepping Authority
Originally posted by cheepnis
And if you'd bothered to dig a little deeper
www.faa.gov...
You'd see that the FAA is not an investigatory agency like the GAO.
Let's go with that. If they're not an investigative agency, then
why is it okay for them to dismiss this incident without an
investigation?
After all, they're not qualified to investigate, right?
And since you seem to know, please help me out here.
Who
should be investigating this if not the FAA?
Strict Guidelines
Originally posted by cheepnis
There are strict guidelines they must adhere to. For example it's not the FAA that investigate plane crashes but the NTSB.
To assume that the FAA would initiate some sort of investigation into an incident that has little verifiable information and had little affect on the
normal flow of aircraft.........ahhhhhhh
I'm trying not to assume anything.
I'm wondering why the FAA would seem to casually dismiss what could very well be a threat to airport and passenger safety with an explanation that
seems to be in contradiction to the well-publicized reports of numerous witnesses -- including people we trust with our safety as passengers.
What's wrong with that?
If you could provide some answers that would resolve these questions, I would be grateful.