O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting -- UPDATE: Photos & Analysis, page 22
Pages: <<  19    20    21    22    23    24    25  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 86 times


reply posted on 16-1-2007 @ 11:47 PM by Majic
Curious Waveform

Though it's a few pages back now, I wanted to address some statements from an
earlier post that leave me with more questions than answers.

Originally posted by cheepnis
Whether atmospheric phenomenon, mass airline worker hallucinations or Unidentified Flying Object, ignoring something like this would seem contrary to the mission of the FAA.

They've hardly ignored it.

Perhaps "ignore" is the wrong word, since they have apparently given an official opinion that it was either an optical illusion or atmospheric phenomenon, depending on who you ask and when.

So let's replace "ignoring" with "summarily dismissing" and acknowledge that the point still stands that safety is part of their mission.

Overstepping Authority

Originally posted by cheepnis
And if you'd bothered to dig a little deeper
www.faa.gov...

You'd see that the FAA is not an investigatory agency like the GAO.

Let's go with that. If they're not an investigative agency, then why is it okay for them to dismiss this incident without an investigation?

After all, they're not qualified to investigate, right?

And since you seem to know, please help me out here.

Who should be investigating this if not the FAA?

Strict Guidelines

Originally posted by cheepnis
There are strict guidelines they must adhere to. For example it's not the FAA that investigate plane crashes but the NTSB.
To assume that the FAA would initiate some sort of investigation into an incident that has little verifiable information and had little affect on the normal flow of aircraft.........ahhhhhhh

I'm trying not to assume anything.

I'm wondering why the FAA would seem to casually dismiss what could very well be a threat to airport and passenger safety with an explanation that seems to be in contradiction to the well-publicized reports of numerous witnesses -- including people we trust with our safety as passengers.

What's wrong with that?

If you could provide some answers that would resolve these questions, I would be grateful.



reply posted on 17-1-2007 @ 10:55 AM by snafu7700
Originally posted by Majic

I'm wondering why the FAA would seem to casually dismiss what could very well be a threat to airport and passenger safety with an explanation that seems to be in contradiction to the well-publicized reports of numerous witnesses -- including people we trust with our safety as passengers.

What's wrong with that?

If you could provide some answers that would resolve these questions, I would be grateful.


i will. as i've mentioned previously, even fellow controllers have had run-ins with unexplained objects....only to be ignored by faa management. unless someone reports a near-miss with one of these objects, faa management simply doesnt care. as i've said before, they dont even accept reports about ufos anymore...much less investigate them. our own manual (controller's manual 7110.65) says to advise pilots reporting strange phenomena to contact NUFORC (who obviously cares even less as, from what i can tell, they dont even bother to request radar/voice tapes from incidents even when they have plenty of time to do so) . the faa is the agency who's rules and regs are written in blood. by that i mean that someone has to die before policy is changed. unless and until an accident is caused by one of these unidentified objects, the faa will simply ignore them. the faa's bottom line is not safety, but the almighty dollar....and investigating these reports costs money. want proof of this? take a look at the new contracts forced upon faa controllers nationwide. you'll see dramatic reductions in pay and benifits. take a look at staffing levels at facilities nationwide. you'll see drastic reductions over the last few years. the faa is trying to run more traffic with fewer people while paying them less money to do it. they simply dont care about this phenomena because it would cost them money to care.

hope that answers your question majic.
Pages: <<  19    20    21    22    23    24    25  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags