That video is a clip from UFO Files, I would recognize that annoying flying text anywhere.

Peter Davenport brings up an interesting point from a Jan 10th posting on UFOUpDates:

An observation on the O'Hare case... Isn't it interesting that,
despite the broad media coverage the sighting has generated, we
have not heard a thing from Congress, or from any other
government office, about the case! NUFORC has not received a
single query from any member of Congress, not a query from any
military or intelligence organization, and not even a quip from
any law enforcement agency. I find that to be even more curious
than the event itself! It suggests to me that individuals in
some of those offices may already know a great deal more about
the UFO phenomenon than they are revealing to 'mere' American
Citizens. They may prefer to let the story die a natural death,
rather than reveal their interest in the incident.

Alternatively, it could simply be that people in positions of
authority intuitively recognize when self-censorship is
advisable... The initial attempt by the FAA to deny that the
event had ever occurred is suggestive of that possibility, I
believe.

Unlike Mr. Davenport, I really am to the point where I don't care if this was an alien ship, what bothers me most is that a security breach happened and not a damn thing is being investigated. Is the US military allowed now to freely fly UAV drones over airports? Are pranksters allowed to fly model aircraft over airports without being investigated?

If no one wants to investigate further than what the FAA did, which conflicts with eyewitness testimony, then we have a culture that never woke up from 9/11. Or we have a government that has decided UFOs are aliens and doesn't care to embarrass themselves and lose their jobs...which brings us back to people sacrificing lives for job security. Great.

Originally posted by Atomic
Unlike Mr. Davenport, I really am to the point where I don't care if this was an alien ship, what bothers me most is that a security breach happened and not a damn thing is being investigated. Is the US military allowed now to freely fly UAV drones over airports? Are pranksters allowed to fly model aircraft over airports without being investigated?

Hey Atomic,

What I think is interesting is the fact that the MoD's Condign Report that was declassified in the Spring of '06 stressed the Flight Safety risk associated with UAP. And here we are talking about a 'UFO' "Hovering" in the highest traveled Airspace in North America. Posing a Flight Safety risk in a low visibility situation!







[edit on 11-1-2007 by lost_shaman]

I would be interested to know what the folks out there generally believe this object was, so here's a poll:

================================

I believe the object above O'hare on the 7th of Nov. was:

a.) An alien craft capable of inter-stellar travel

b.) A US (or other terrestrial) government craft doing some re-con work

c.) The clouds trying to 'pinch a deuce' on the tarmac

d.) A turd sandwich

================================

Please answer truthfully, and explain why if you would like.

enjoy!
~Hamking :-D

Hamking.....

A or B..........


(you forgot Turd Sandwich or Douchebag)

Originally posted by Hamking
================================

I believe the object above O'hare on the 7th of Nov. was:

a.) An alien craft capable of inter-stellar travel

b.) A US (or other terrestrial) government craft doing some re-con work

c.) The clouds trying to 'pinch a deuce' on the tarmac

d.) A turd sandwich

================================

B then A in that order.

I can't participate in your poll because i was not there when it happened.



Just exactly how many people saw this ufo?

from what i read so far it seems that a lot of people saw this ufo?

First, it was Roswell, New Mexico. Now, O'hare airport? When will the aliens finally come?!?!

I want to point out some basics on the UFO at O'hare.

Some reports, people and groups believe it might be a experimental US government craft.

Now why would the US government that covers up almost everything experimental, including area 51 want to bring one of its top secret crafts and hover over one the the worlds busiest airports?

Hrm...

I would put more credability on the former myself. A probe of some sort, or recon work. I really doubt the craft was poking its head out so it could be seen. Doesn't seem like it was dramatic enough of an event for that...

I've never heard of the Blue Beam project before so I started poking around... everything I read about it though, sounds like some tin-foil hat wearing nut ranting about the NWO. It's all just speculation from what I've seen.

Are there any sources out there with any real credible evidence to lend support the idea that NASA is planning a system that can display 3d holigraphic images in the sky, while at the same time controlling our brains so it sounds like god or whomever else they want us to hear is speaking inside our skulls?

I believe HAARP exists for the purpose of weather control, but I'll doubt its capability extends into "collective" mind control until I can see some evidence suggestive of such a capability.

who knows whats really out there though... anything is possible, right? ;-)

Hamking :-D

[edit on 12-1-2007 by Hamking]

Originally posted by Realtruth
I want to point out some basics on the UFO at O'hare.

Some reports, people and groups believe it might be a experimental US government craft.

Now why would the US government that covers up almost everything experimental, including area 51 want to bring one of its top secret crafts and hover over one the the worlds busiest airports?

It is clear that it was a craft, whether alien or human made. Neither would have reason to purposely hover over O'Hare just to be seen.

I can only speculate that the pilot either forgot to turn on the cloaking, or it was not working and they didn't realize it until people were looking at them.