It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Follow God or vanish, Ahmadinejad tells West

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 08:39 AM
link   
your right,

acccept we are living in today.

its todays events which are going to shape our future.

why put your head in the sand because u prefer to think about 100yrs down the track when YOU wont be here!




posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 08:48 AM
link   
America itself should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons!

Their leader states that he gets his orders from god.

America is the real nuclear danger in this world.
Preemptive nuclear strikes thats what America wants.
that is just crazy.

How more crazy can it get.
Look at your own leader, Americanofascist.
Before burning countries in your nuclear strikes.

You can try and turn facts the way you like.
America has been the biggest nuclear danger in this world so far.



posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
why put your head in the sand because u prefer to think about 100yrs down the track when YOU wont be here!


You missed my point. In 100 years what is happening today will be insgnificant in history, it won't matter one iota.
I don't hvae my head in the sand, I just can't be bothered endlessy going back and forth with absolutely no headway being made from wither sides.
As for not being here in 100 years, I beg to differ with advances in genetics and the increasing life expectance of people, being around in 100 years is more likely than not.
So maybe I will look back at the beginning of the 22nd century to this one and shake my head and chuckle about how backward we are today



posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by byhiniur
I sympathise with why he'd call our countries oppresive and why he'd feel backed into a corner. Hopefully our leaders will wake up and make better decisions.

OR, we could just destroy his country, since its threatening us.

I mean, it works both ways.


The point is that noone should have nuclear weapons, because if we have them then all countries should have them.

Sure. EXCEPT for countries that sign agreements, promising to not have nuclear weapons.

Iran signed just such an agreement. They signed an international agreement to receive western nuclear technology and expertise, to build cheap, affordable, clean, nuclear power, and permit the international community to have complete and open access to these programmes, and to never, ever, for all eternity, develop weapons.


BitRaiser
Iran has stated over and over that they are NOT INTERESTED IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS!

They're lying. Flat out, they are lying. They want nuclear weapons.

IRAN IS BEING SMART to start this sort of development BEFORE they run out of oil.

Iran isn't even close of running out of oil, nor is any other nation in the middle east.

Just because you (and the corporate controlled mass-media) call this rightfully elected world leader a "nutjob" doesn't make it true.

Its amazing that people can think bush is crazy for being 'so religious', and yet not bat an eye at ahmadinejad. The man is a religious fanatic. Period. He is a fanatical devotee of the shi'ite sect. He beleives that America is the dupe of Satan, that Satan is a real, physical being in the world, that he is powerful, and that he is secretly running things. He beleives that he, personally, himself, directly talks to the Occulted Mahdi, and that the end of the world is probably comming upon us. That at the end of the world, Imam Mohammed Mahdi, a man, from hundreds of years ago, is going to re-appear, take command of an islamic army that has been waiting for him, and wipe out the nonbeleivers.


And just for the record, I have been told that I'm going to "burn in hell" by a Christian nutjob street-preacher

Ahmadinejad is that guy. Do you really want that guy in charge of a supposedly civilian nuclear programme? Would you be the least bit supiscious if he wasn't letting anyone inspect that nuclear programme? And at the same time was telling the sinners they're going to be punished, 'real soon'?

Alright? So lets not say that this guy isn't a wackadoo. Lots of people pray and beleive weird things. This guy thinks he is talking to the occulted mahdi himself, and that he sometimes has a magical halo/aura that surrounds him. Bush is a little fringy when it comes to religion, but this guy, he's a goddamned fanatic. When religious fanatics start saying 'you are the spawn of satan and you will die at the hands of the righteous', they're not engaging in hyperbole, they are forwardly telling you what they are going to do to you. In new england, they killed the witches. In europe, they burned people and ran crusades. Ahmadinejad is going to get nuclear bombs and blow up western cities.




[edit on 13-12-2006 by Nygdan]

[edit on 13-12-2006 by Nygdan]



posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by BitRaiser
Iran has stated over and over that they are NOT INTERESTED IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
They are researching nuclear power. Big difference.




Are you serious?

That's the funniest line I've heard since John Kerry tried his hand a comedy.



posted on Dec, 13 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nygdan
Sure. EXCEPT for countries that sign agreements, promising to not have nuclear weapons.[edit on 13-12-2006 by Nygdan]


How about that moral agreement made between nations that one shall never go to war with one another unless directly threatened or in imminent danger?

Seems if the USA cannot follow moral standards set in the 'new world' why should other countries?

If Israel have the bomb, Iran have the right to the bomb in my opinion.

This whole idea created by the USA of 'pre-emptive' opens too many doors for evil governments to maniuplate world opinion.

IE IRAQ!

countries going to the brink of anhiliation with all weapons pointed, stocked, locked and loaded brings out the best in people.

IE Cold War.

Look at where that got us?

Let Iran have the bomb.
Get both countries to stand up nose to nose in screaming fight...

They'll have 2 options.
To BOMB
or to TALK

both of them are HUMAN... they'll talk before they fire weapons.
because who ever fires the first weapon, will become the first casualty.

Us pushing our weight around ordering nations NOT to build PROTECTIVE measures is whats causing all this trouble.


especially when we FAVOUR the nation that has the trump card,

yet doesnt deserve it, in the eyes of the opposition.

[edit on 13-12-2006 by Agit8dChop]



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 02:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott

Originally posted by BitRaiser
Iran has stated over and over that they are NOT INTERESTED IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
They are researching nuclear power. Big difference.




Are you serious?

That's the funniest line I've heard since John Kerry tried his hand a comedy.

I challenge you to find a single shred of proof to support the notion that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons that I haven't already debunked.

If you can't do that, then you need to understand that your fears are irrational and driven by the mass-media who wants you to believe that Iran is evil because that serves their corporate backed agenda.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:14 AM
link   
bitraiser, finally someone with a head on their shoulders.
the media is always trying to put down some country that USA wants to attack, it makes me sick. I had a discussion with my friend saying Iran is researching hard water for their nuclear weapon program... these people need to learn how to educate themselves i cant stand it anymore.

Canada's power plans plutonium cant even be used in a nuclear weapon why don't countries use our technology.. doesnt make sense...


bitraiser u are a smart man/woman. u2u me sometime...



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by BitRaiser

I challenge you to find a single shred of proof to support the notion that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons that I haven't already debunked.


Absence of evidence (or proof) is not evidence of absence. I'm sure you're familiar with this truth.




If you can't do that, then you need to understand that your fears are irrational and driven by the mass-media who wants you to believe that Iran is evil because that serves their corporate backed agenda.


So failure by a person to produce proof of Irans nuclear weapons plans requires compulsory acknowlegdement of that persons own irrational fears? Utter rubbish.

I think Nygdan, and many others have clearly illustrated the many reasons that it is not irrational to have grave concerns regarding Iran's leadership's intentions. And not only in regard to nuclear weapons.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 09:32 AM
link   
I think an importan question we need to ask here is HOW does Iran profit from going into a nuclear war with the US or Israel? And the answer is quite simply that they don't. They are, quite simply, no match for the big guns. The media would have you believe that this guy is intending to send his country back into the stone age (from retaliation bombing) by picking on the biggest bullys in the schoolyard...


Some extreme religious groups would probably welcome this war because it fits with their understanding of holy war etc. but NO government in the world would ever dream of going to war with two nuclear superpowers! We already learned this lesson during the cold war. If one country launch missiles, the others will follow, and just about everybody dies...

The reason "civilized" countries like the US is going to war with ME countries like Iran is NOT for the greater good of mankind, but for their own selfish, greedy reasons. Look at Saudi Arabia. They are one of the most extreme countries in the ME where women are treated like crap and have no rights, abuse is the standard, and some seriously screwed up religious fanatics are in control. Hey, if I remember right the 9/11 hijackers were mostly from SA too, so you'd think that would be the place to start, right? Does the US attack SA? Noooo, you buy oil from them and help them invest that money back into the US.
The Binladen family has been shown to have connections with the Bush family!

I say, let them have their nuclear technology, and let's help them develop it in a safe and responsible manner. I'm sure Iran will cooperate fully with the IAEA once the US stops harrassing them and manipulating the security council. No country has the right to deny another country technology wheter it be for good or bad...

And if you insist on constantly waging war, there are plenty of countries who desperately need help in Africa! Go there and fight for freedom and democracy! But noooo, there's no profit in such wars... No oil... No rebuilding contracts as there weren't any buildings there to begin with
And most importantly of all, there is no need to control Africa in order to build an oil pipeline across it. That, my friends, is what the war in the ME is all about.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 11:04 AM
link   
Dr. Leary -

manipulation the SC?
Yeah.....the US can manipulate China, Russia & France............


You are correct......a rational government would not intentionally use a nuclear weapon first........

That's where the problem is; Amijinahaud is part of the radical groups you mentioned. He feels it's their mission to destroy the 'Zionist regime' (Israel) at any cost. The Iranian peoples sacrifice (of being vaporized)would be worth it as long as Isreal is destroyed. It would be fullfilling a religious ideology. Iran is not be run by 'government types' but by religious idealist.

I woory about if Irans supreme leaders dies (the one that actually has the power) and if a more radical one will take his place.

Maybe the 12th Iman.......



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by BitRaiser
Iran has stated over and over that they are NOT INTERESTED IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS!


Yes. But considering the source of that statement we can say it's BUNK.


IRAN IS BEING SMART to start this sort of development BEFORE they run out of oil.


If their leader wasn't a terrorist and a wingnut I'd agree fully with that statement. As it is, he's a whack and the thought of him having anything nuclear should scare the stuff'n out of everyone on the planet.

I just thought of something. Remember the big party he threw with dancers prancing around with viles of yellowcake? STRANGE.


We DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to tell Iran that they cannot invest in technological research simply because it could be abused. I could go out right now and kill someone with a car. Does that mean I should have my driver's license revoked?


If someone has a drivers license and they are out of control, drunk, or mouthing off and say that they are going to drive that car into a crowded school yard full of children then the drivers license should be taken away. Considering the leader of Iran, his instability, his past ... he doesn't deserve to be at the helm of a nuclear nation.


Stop being such a #$%#ing dup!

Cussing at/about fellow ATS members is against the rules.



[edit on 12/14/2006 by FlyersFan]



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaamaan
America itself should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons! America is the real nuclear danger in this world.


The fact that we do have them has stopped more wars than you could possibly imagine. You should be GLAD that we have them.


Preemptive nuclear strikes thats what America wants.


We've had nuclear weapons for decades upon decades. They were only used twice - to end a war that was started against us by Japan. I am absolutely sure that if Iran had nukes they wouldn't hold on to them for even a month without using them ... let alone decades upon decades.



posted on Dec, 14 2006 @ 03:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by ferretman2
Dr. Leary -

manipulation the SC?
Yeah.....the US can manipulate China, Russia & France............



Well the US doesn't really need to manipulate China, Russia and France because they are just as dependant on oil as the US, so the goals are more or less the same.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 06:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by BitRaiser
I challenge you to find a single shred of proof to support the notion that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons that I haven't already debunked.


LOL you never cease to crack me up, How could you possibly sit there behind your screen in Canada and Debunk anyones theory that Iran has Nuclear Weapon Ambitions ??

You personally have more Intel Gathering methods than the Entire Western world or something ?

Only thing thats been debunked here is your Debunking claims.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrLeary
I think an importan question we need to ask here is HOW does Iran profit from going into a nuclear war with the US or Israel? And the answer is quite simply that they don't.


True. They do not profit and cannot succeed in a war w/ the US.

However, they need not wage war as a state. Once they posess the fissile mass of uranium/plutonium needed, they simply supply it to Al Queda, Hammas, Hezballah, Islamic Jihad, etc.. You can learn how to build a nuclear device on the internet. The ingredient needed by these organizations is fissile material. And fissile material from an operation that has not been under UN observation will not be traceable via isotope signature once detected...either by surveilence, or Allah forbid.... detonation.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaamaan
America itself should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons!


uh huh, and why exactly should we not posess the weapons we helped to create?

More to the point, who would keep us from having them?




posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 03:51 PM
link   
This whole nuke debate turns into my penis is bigger then yours.
thats all it is and with hidden agendas.

nukes are stupid.
just because you have nuclear reactor doesn't mean your going to build a nuclear weapon.

if you want one. go buy it from Bulgaria on the black market , cuz you can.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedangler

just because you have nuclear reactor doesn't mean your going to build a nuclear weapon.


You will unless you are:

a) Stupid, or

b) Have an ally with nuclear weapons who will protect your interests.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by NumberCruncher

Originally posted by BitRaiser
I challenge you to find a single shred of proof to support the notion that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons that I haven't already debunked.


LOL you never cease to crack me up, How could you possibly sit there behind your screen in Canada and Debunk anyones theory that Iran has Nuclear Weapon Ambitions ??

You personally have more Intel Gathering methods than the Entire Western world or something ?

Only thing thats been debunked here is your Debunking claims.

So... show me the link.
It's that simple. Show me proof. Hell, show me a solid indicator. Show me anything other than your ignorant assumptions that Iran wants nuclear weapons.

Lay out your cards, 'cause I'm callin.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join