Originally posted by WyrdeOne
I don't see anything wrong with limited physical discipline. If it's done in anger, it's not right.
If it's done to get the kid's attention, I think there's merit there.
After reading MCory1's response, I was still in disagreement. But after reading this as well, I stand corrected. I am against the physical
punishment of a child, when it is done in anger. I do believe reinforcement is the ticket, but very limited physical discipline should be
acceptable.
When I was about twelve years old, I had joked with an older man that easily could of been perceived as slightly offensive. He, I, and everyone else
that heard it, understood that I meant no harm. My mother on the other hand, seen that it could of been portrayed as me being ignorant. She quickly
put me in my place, and I knew damn well I would never let it slip again. Well, not in front of her.
So thinking back to that moment, I do agree with what has been said.
Back to this individual case.
Parents, especially this mother, need to step up and begin to take responsibility for their children. We can not depend on the state to govern the
actions of our child, and expect them to bail us out when times become difficult.
I deal with a lot of children. I work with troubled youth and I also volunteer as a coach in youth sports. Every child is given my respect, and I
expect it in return. When I am shown respect, I am much more tolerable. I believe first and foremost, the parents need to have the respect of the
child.
If your child does not respect you as a parent, you need to rethink your strategy.
It is not enough to demand respect. You need to earn it, and retain it. If you want your child to respect you, you must respect the child.
Which is the crux of the problem with this family, in my opinion.