It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Confiscated Hotel Video Released...No Plane

page: 1
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 02:54 AM
link   
So where's the plane?

www.prisonplanet.com...




posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 02:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mindzi
So where's the plane?

www.prisonplanet.com...


behind the pentagon where you cant see it.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 02:59 AM
link   
O rly? I guess that explains it. lol...

Why was the video confiscated by the FBI in the first place then?



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 03:01 AM
link   
The hotel is where? I am having trouble viewing it, it's so blurry and small. It looks like you cant see the plane because its impacting out of sight ? Are we say south east and the impact is north west?

7A



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 03:05 AM
link   
Actually, it strengthens the case since you can clearly see the tail of the plane just prior mili-seconds before the impact.

NeoN HaZe.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 03:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mindzi
O rly? I guess that explains it. lol...

Why was the video confiscated by the FBI in the first place then?


YES RLY!
i think it explains it.
and instead of ranting on the net why dont you mail the fbi with that question?



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 03:33 AM
link   
Neon Haze nailed it. In the close up you can see the tail of the plane just above the freeway prior to the explosion. The text on the video is misleading because the plane came in at a very low angle. If it were coming in as pointed out in the video it would have been coming straight down.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:01 AM
link   
neonhaze: show me that tail cause I see isht on this movie :>



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:12 AM
link   
Im sorry, but this video does not show a boeing slamming into the pentagon.

This video, and the first video DO NOT ADD UP WITH EACH OTHER

IE the speed of the impact.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:28 AM
link   
I'm no video analyst and I'm not going to pretend I am so I honestly don't know if its the plane or a car.

At the end of the day I'm not even bothering with Pentagon theories anymore. If people wish to believe that a missle hit the building after reading 150+ eyewitness accounts where not one mentions a missile and only one mentions a small plane (where the guy was 2 miles away), and seeing wreckage and a body from the plane... have fun.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by STolarZ
neonhaze: show me that tail cause I see isht on this movie :>


Here Ya go.

Look closely at the very beginning. You can clearly see an object that looks very much like a tail of a plane.



Then the explosion caused by the fuel in the wings igniting.

Hope that helps,

All the best,

NeoN HaZe.


[edit on 4-12-2006 by Neon Haze]



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:31 AM
link   
The Pentagon is not the key to this puzzle.
I feel 911 will unravel at another seam.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Neon Haze

Originally posted by STolarZ
neonhaze: show me that tail cause I see isht on this movie :>


Here Ya go.

Look closely at the very beginning. You can clearly see an object that looks very much like a tail of a plane.



Then the explosion caused by the fuel in the wings igniting.

Hope that helps,

All the best,

NeoN HaZe.


[edit on 4-12-2006 by Neon Haze]




Sorry mate, but that minute blur of 'something'
does not look like anything.


It certainly does not look 'enough' like something for me to declare it the tail of a boeing.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Sorry mate, but that minute blur of 'something'
does not look like anything.


It certainly does not look 'enough' like something for me to declare it the tail of a boeing.


So Agit8ed,

Seeing as you feel you are qualified to conclude what that is or isn't, what are your video analysis credentials?



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:36 AM
link   
Look at the person walking away.
he doesnt even FLINCH at a BOEING coming in that fast that low..

it EXPLODES and he walks off.


IF I was standing next to such a pinacle feature of the american military might..
I heard a loud jet coming in, then a large explosion.. I would not simply turn around and walk off at regular pace.



[edit on 4-12-2006 by Agit8dChop]



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by doctorfungi

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Sorry mate, but that minute blur of 'something'
does not look like anything.


It certainly does not look 'enough' like something for me to declare it the tail of a boeing.


So Agit8ed,

Seeing as you feel you are qualified to conclude what that is or isn't, what are your video analysis credentials?


So I have to have a degree to state that i believe the video show's NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE?

It SHOWS NOTHING!

PERIOD!

NADDA!

IT DOES NOT SHOW A BOEING AIRLINER THAT WAS HICJAKED HITTING HTE PENTAGON.

IT SHOWS 'SOMETHING' happening...

Why cant they release the video's from other various security camera's AROUND THe pentagon?

5yrs to release this?
after so much struggle to get it?

Its a very good attempt at making the gullable believe something without actually seeing it.

If theres ANY DOUBT.. there's NO DOUBT
And I have a lot of doubts about this government and that day.

Until i have full on frontal footage of a boeing hitting the pentagon...
I will gladly admit ok yes a plane hit.

but 3 frames of 'something' dont cut it
a ctv video from inside a servo dont cut it
and this video, showing nothing but a fireball, with 'something' doesnt cut it.



[edit on 4-12-2006 by Agit8dChop]



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 04:50 AM
link   
OMFG
If this smth looks like a tail then for someone who believes in flying whales it will looks like whale tail



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 05:14 AM
link   
Well one thing is for certain!!

It doesn't look like a tomahawk missile or any other missile...

And on a side note... please calm down people... no need for this to get heated...

NeoN HaZe.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 05:21 AM
link   
I think it shows just as much 'possibility' of a missle hitting.

while I dont follow that theory.... you cannot say yes or no to anything based on that footage.

the very first video show's more possibility of a small cesna type 'thing' hitting the pentagon.



who's getting heated?

I just get very very frustrated when people DECLARE proof, when it shows anything but.

and then when u state it doesnt back up theyre story, they slap you with
'' so what credentials do you have to analyse the footage ''
clearly I have noone.

but i do have common sense.



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 05:32 AM
link   
Bottom line..

If proof EXISTED of a boeing airliner striking the pentagon..

They would of showed you.... from the begining.

being they are showing something that DOESNT Show you proof, yet they declare it IS proof, says to me they have NO PROOF of a plane hitting.

If they DONT have proof of a plane hitting the pentagon, in the manner they state.........

What is it they have proof of, that they are not showing you.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join