It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by simtek
Point 1. Reading your post, one would get the idea that Clinton or Gore never took any money from anyone. Get real, They were more that willing to suck up the money from the unions and the Hollywood elite loosers.
Point 2As for the Kyoto accord, why should we have all these restrictions while third world countries and China don't have to cut emissions. Screw them, if they want it, it should be all or nothing. Why should I loose my job because the factory I work at had to shut down so they can build in some third world crap hole where you can still pollute. At least here, most of the companies make an effort (minor ones at least) to curb pollution.
Point 3.By the way, if you really care about the environment, I'd like to know if you:
1. live in a house
2. drive or own a car
3. have electrical appliances
4. eat anything other than veggies
By saying yes to any of these means that you care about the environment as much as 99.99% of the rest of the population.
A true "environment lover" should live in a cave naked eating grass.
Originally posted by earthtone
Point 3.
I am a vegetarian.
I don't drive a car.
But I obviously live in a house and have electrical appliances. If you're going to criticise me for living in a house then it just shows that you can't actually debate the real issues here. I do my best for the enviroment. I recycle all my waste into 3 different bins so that it is processed in an enviremoentally friendly way. I go to the bottle bank. I use public transport or share lifts with people. Donate to greenpeace blah blah blah.
Originally posted by simtek
Point well taken.
I try to do what I can for the environment too. Recycling, power friendly devices, and such. I just don't care for those that insist that I'm not doing enough. Mostly the Greenpeace and ELF crowds. There is a practical limit to what you can do, and everyone has to survive.
Originally posted by earthtone
Do you agree with my other points simtek?
Originally posted by THENEO
the globalists desire that the developed world be burdened by environmentalists so that the transfer of wealth to the third world go smoothly.
good work helping them!
Originally posted by RottGutt
I think he is 100% correct. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete moron.
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by RottGutt
I think he is 100% correct. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete moron.
He sure has your lips firmly Krazy glued to his ass, doesn't he?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Originally posted by ghost
How Can I put this gentially.
HELL NO! DID YOU ACTUALLY THINK I'M CRAZY ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THAT IDIOT!
George Bush is the Most Arrogant, selfish, self absorbed, stuck up, foolish, incompetent, crooket, devious, Scummy, sleezeball ever to enter the Oval Office! He's an insualt to the nation and it's people. He's an embarrisment to every politican who possesses even the slightest hint of true patriotism in his or her heart!
The though of what this man has done to what started as a respectble nation is enough to make me sick with Disgust!
dose that answer the question?
Tim
Republicans griped because Clinton Screwed an intern, But Bush screwed a whole nation, where are the Republican'ts Now
[Edited on 26-11-2003 by ghost]
Originally posted by JFetch
There are 2 ways to look at this.
1. We have a duty to attack any threat against our way of life, or
2. People should change their government if it's a threat against them. (The people of Iraq couldn't do it themselves because they would have ended up dead.)
Either way, I think we did the right thing.
Originally posted by Satyr
The people in Iraq have less freedom now than they did under Saddam.
[Edited on 11-26-2003 by Satyr]