It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The first caller to the station in Washington said that Klein must be "off his rocker." The second congratulated him and added: "Not only do you tattoo them in the middle of their forehead but you ship them out of this country ... they are here to kill us."
Another said that tattoos, armbands and other identifying markers such as crescent marks on driver's licenses, passports and birth certificates did not go far enough. "What good is identifying them?" he asked. "You have to set up encampments like during World War Two with the Japanese and Germans."
[note the emphasis is my own]
"Because basically what you just did was show me how the German people allowed what happened to the Jews to happen ... We need to separate them, we need to tattoo their arms, we need to make them wear the yellow Star of David, we need to put them in concentration camps, we basically just need to kill them all because they are dangerous."
Originally posted by zooplancton
i can't believe i read that first sentence. sorry i didn't get past it...
oh and Raist is spelled 'racist'.
[edit on 21/12/2012 by zooplancton]
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Originally posted by zooplancton
i can't believe i read that first sentence. sorry i didn't get past it...
oh and Raist is spelled 'racist'.
[edit on 21/12/2012 by zooplancton]
You should have read past the first line.
You misinterpreted the intent of this thread.
Originally posted by Flighty
I think moderate Muslims have to take some responsibility for these kind of attitudes
that prevail. If they stood up and made it heard that they dont condone nor approve
of terrorism in any way shape or form, I think it would get through to these kinds of people, that not all Muslims want to kill you.
I think there silence during 9/11 (in most western countries a lot of them were partying
and cheering in the streets for gods sake, I should know I experienced this where I live in Sydney) then this kind of behaviour doesnt exactly instill confidence.
These Muslims live in western countries with free speach and so could, if they wanted to,
come out and openly disapprove without being killed/maimed/tortured like they would be in extreme Muslim countries, and yet there is still mostly silence..."crickets"
I believe the answer to the end of this nonsense is for Muslims who really do want peace to come out and drown out the extremists in one voice.
I think the radio callers views in that article are absolutely atrocious. I dont agree with any of it.
But the key to the answer lies with moderate Muslims.IMO.
Originally posted by zooplancton
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Originally posted by zooplancton
i can't believe i read that first sentence. sorry i didn't get past it...
oh and Raist is spelled 'racist'.
[edit on 21/12/2012 by zooplancton]
You should have read past the first line.
You misinterpreted the intent of this thread.
absolutely, and i stand corrected. thanks for the call out.
sometimes it hard to get past what you think is going to be "the rest of the thread".
thanks a ton. apologies Raist.
Originally posted by Flighty
With all respect Raist, I think that is a very defeatist attitude.
I think most people are pretty good at reading body language and know whats sincere
and what isnt.
Which is why so much debate happens here and on other forums. We KNOW when
we are being lied to.
So long as the protesting against radicals by moderates IS sincere, then most people will know and feel it.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
This means nothing. Some radio jerk makes some outlandish statements and the story is all about the people who called in to his show.
What a crock.
Originally posted by IAF101
It seems like people are investing more time trying to defend these terrorists than actually bring them to justice.
Originally posted by thematrix
People like the US President you mean?
He spends more time invading countries he has admitted having NOTHING to do with 9/11, he has said Osama Bin Laden is not a priority, doesn't matter and he doesn't care about him.
Yet at the same time, everytime he needs some backing from the people, hes the first to yell out 9/11, Osama Bin Laden, Terrorists and Al-Quada.
Do the muslims in the US have the resources to go out in the world and find Osama? Heck no.
Is there a certain president that has overextended his nation resources to go out and invade countries that have nothing to do with Osama or 9/11(which he admitted on TV), or while he is in the country that is supposed to harbor Osama, has let the asshole and his henchmen escape at least 4 documented and reported times?
While at the same time allowing the country go from 0 heroine production to the world leader in it?
Saying the muslims in the US, Europe and everywhere else then where Osama might actualy be are responsible for not finding Osama is ignorance at its best.
The person that has the resources and capabilities to catch Osama is wasting these capabilities and resources on invading nations that have nothing to do with the subject, wasting these capabilities and resources on erroding the very constitution hes sworn to protect and he has admitted that the resources and capabilities at his disposal will not be used to catch Osama, because he is non of his concern and he doesn't care about catching Osama!
Just as now, the people behind George Bush have flown planes into the WTC to blame it on Muslims so that they could invade muslim nations, that happen to be the key strategic points they defined in the 90's as being the key geostrategic zones they needed to get their hands on to insure "American Supremacy".
Then, whoever sais "hey, but its good to keep the US the supreme ruler of the world", know that these Neo-Concervatives that run the US at the moment don't see the US as a country with borders, they see it as an ideology that spans the world, they don't care about the US citizens, they only care about power and world domination.