It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One skeptic was the late-Herbert Levine who invented spray fireproofing with wet asbestos in the late-1940s. Levine’s invention involved a combination of asbestos with mineral wool and made commonplace the construction of large steel framed buildings. Levine’s company, Asbestospray, was familiar with the World Trade Center construction, but failed to get the contract for spraying insulation in the World Trade Center. Levine frequently would say that "if a fire breaks out above the 64th floor, that building will fall down."
What I do have a problem with is believing someone would go billions of dollars into debt for nothing.
Originally posted by doctorfungi
What I do have a problem with is believing someone would go billions of dollars into debt for nothing.
Originally posted by Griff5. How much Silverstein has lost due to no rent minus the cost to run the towers per year. Speculation, but since the towers are no longer operational (costs little to run now) wouldn't him not getting rent be negligable?
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by doctorfungi
What I do have a problem with is believing someone would go billions of dollars into debt for nothing.
I'd like to see the proof here. I believe you but would like to see proof. We need to find out:
1. How much the towers cost to run per year.
2. How much was recieved back in rent (this comes into play later also).
3. How much Silverstein bought them for.
4. How much money Silverstein got back from insurance.
5. How much Silverstein has lost due to no rent minus the cost to run the towers per year. Speculation, but since the towers are no longer operational (costs little to run now) wouldn't him not getting rent be negligable?
6. How much to build the new tower (and who is actually paying for it).
I'd like to see someone put together a "timeline" of money paid and made per year (maybe I'll put it together if someone helps me find the info). Then we can see if Larry actually made money or is paying. Without the speculation.
Originally posted by Black_Fox
I still wanna know,was Silvestien gonna pay to have all the asbestos removed?
If so,is there any proof he made steps to do just that?Also if a recall it would have been somewhere near a billion dollars to do such renovations to the towers.And i highly doubt he had any plans of doing that.And that leads to the question of why buy a building in need of such repairs?Unless there was a way to make money off of it,without fixing them.Insurance perhaps?
Originally posted by CameronFox
All WHAT asbestos?? Only one tower had asbestos and that was only up to the 34th floor I believe.
Im not sure if he was ordered to remove the existing asbestos. I work in a building that was built in the 30's. There is asbestos everywhere, the only time we are forced to have it abated is if we need to expose a pipe or work in CLOSE proximity of it.
WTC7 Had None.
Originally posted by Griff
I'd like for you to find the asbestos free info about NYC. I haven't heard this before. I do work on buildings in NYC and we still test for asbestos.
Edit: Maybe they got the quote because Silverstein was thinking about taking out the asbestos and when he found out it was costly, ditched the idea? Just a thought.
[edit on 12/1/2006 by Griff]
the New York Port Authority had planned to use 5000 tons of asbestos-containing sprayed fireproofing on floors 1-40 of the buildings. Above the fortieth floor, non-asbestos alternatives were to be used. This is confirmed by an article which appeared in the New York Times on September 18, 2001: "Anticipating a ban (on the use of asbestos in construction in NY), the builders stopped using the materials by the time they reached the 40th floor of the north tower, the first one to go up…" According to a spokesman for the Port Authority "more than half of the original, asbestos-containing material was later replaced."