It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dave_54
Urban and suburban areas would suffer more, but the rural areas would mostly just shrug and life would go on with only a minor inconvenience.
I just can't seem to relate to your dire scenario.
Originally posted by JackJuice
That’s my first three days what's yours?
Originally posted by Skibum
Originally posted by JackJuice
That’s my first three days what's yours?
If thats your first three days, I suspect I or someone else who prepared in advance of the catastrophe will be left to bury your body.
Sorry, you don't honestly think you're going to be able to get food, gas and a genny after the fact do you?
Originally posted by zooplancton
i think on some angles after the initial "greed" of people's heightened scare, people would eventually work together. (or not) supplies would run low. one guy has this, the other guy has that; seems like people would pool together in some fashion. (or am i a hopeless romantic?)
[edit on 21/12/2012 by zooplancton]
Originally posted by brill
Easy, wouldn't do a damn thing. Why bother. If an all out nuclear confrontation starts why would you want to survive. I'd grab a bottle of scotch, a lawn chair and watch the circus unfold. I'd probably be dead by days end.
You can take all the precautions you want but the reality is that man would resort to primordial survival. People would kill each other over a loaf of bread or a jug of water. You could only defend yourself so long before someone overpowered you. Case in point:
When the blackout of 2003 occured it really was an eye opener to how panic set in and how people lose most of their rational decision making. I saw people pulling cases of water from other peoples hand for really no reason. Basically they lost it and that was just a relatively brief power outage, can you image a nuclear strike.
brill