It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


"Almost Biblical Semantics"

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 03:06 AM
Yesterday I was reading a thread on the Bohemian Grove (of which I had remarkably never heard before) when I suddenly recalled an article I read several months ago in German magazine 'Der Spiegel'. It was about Germany's ex-chancellor Gerhard Schröder's recently published memories of his time as chancellor; which you can read below:

"Almost Biblical Semantics"


Schröder, as he makes clear in his newly published memoirs, was unimpressed by Bush's hawkishness and the president's turn away from Afghanistan and toward what Schröder saw as an unnecessary conflict.

"I don't know exactly when in the year 2002 the change in justification for a war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq took place -- when, in other words, the fight against international terrorism slid into the background and the possible existence of weapons of mass destruction was thrust into the foreground. But the change made me increasingly distrustful."

Even at the beginning of 2002, though, Schröder began to have his doubts about the American president. Bush's shifting of attention from Afghanistan to Iraq began early in the year. Schröder found his Jan. 29, 2002 speech -- in which Bush coined the phrase "Axis of Evil" -- to contain "almost Biblical semantics."


"In our conversations," Schröder writes, "it was constantly clear just how much this president considered himself 'God-fearing' and indeed saw God as his ultimate authority." Schröder assures his readers that he has no problem with religion or the religious. "But the problem ... begins when the impression is created that political decisions are a result of this conversation with God."

Indeed, Schröder indicates he is deeply mistrustful of the role religion plays in the United States:

"In my opinion, the demonizing of George W. Bush tends to divert attention from the need to critically examine a political alliance in the United States that I consider problematic for the world and America: Schröder goes on to say that the West is right to criticize Islamic states for not having a clear separation between church and state -- which he describes as a great advance of civilization.

"But we are not nearly as willing to acknowledge similar tendencies in the United States when it comes to Christian fundamentalists and their interpretation of the Bible. If both sides claim to be the rightful owners of all valid truths, there can be no room for peaceful solutions." the alliance between neoconservative intellectuals and Christian fundamentalists, which had and still has a great deal of influence over the policies of the United States and its president."


(How much) does Christianity influence Bush's decision making, do you think?. Do we underestimate the role that Christianity fundamentalism plays because we are solely focused on Muslim fundamentalism?

Depending on the question whether you agree with Schröder, little has changed compared to the middle times when religion was the primary factor for the violence between Muslims and Christians.

[edit on 29-11-2006 by Mdv2]

new topics

log in