It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BALTIMORE—Now that scientists have developed a blueprint
for how the next generation of astronauts will whisk back to
the Moon, it's time to figure out what to do when they get
there and why.
This week at a workshop entitled "Astrophysics Enabled by
the Return to the Moon" at the Space Telescope Science
Institute here, astrophysicists are discussing such Moon plans,
including the idea of setting up telescopes on the lunar surface.
...
Another issue is levitated dust, which occurs when the Sun's
energy cause dust grains to become electrically charged.
"I think we need to continue to evaluate whether the Moon is
usable for astronomy or not," said Paul Spudis of the Johns
Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel,
Maryland.
"And finally we need to fill in the missing pieces of knowledge
and specifically we need to characterize this dust levitation
and find out—does this occur and what the real magnitude of
the effect is."
SOURCE:
Space.com
Originally posted by hannibal the cannibal
Personally I would like to see the moon remain absolutely untouched and in its beautiful, natural form as it is now. Certainly there is definite scope for scientific study, but it should be the exception, not the norm. All this talk of moon bases and telescopes makes me feel quite sad really.
Speaking of the proposed telescope, perhaps it would be a better idea to develop a successor to Hubble that would simply orbit in a similar fashion, rather than having to come up with solutions to the inevitable problems that would be faced with a moon-based device. It makes not only ecological but also economical sense to me, but perhaps that would be too simple for government to comprehend huh?
Speaking of the proposed telescope, perhaps it would be a better idea to develop a successor to Hubble that would simply orbit in a similar fashion, rather than having to come up with solutions to the inevitable problems that would be faced with a moon-based device. It makes not only ecological but also economical sense to me, but perhaps that would be too simple for government to comprehend huh?