It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
...Esoteric Teacher (no answer supplied, yet)
I think it would only be fair to ask that you supply your opinion...After all you started the poll.
Originally posted by soshootme
where did you get this idea from. tell me tell me!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I took all the rules of the bible, and applied them to the words. This is a quantum leap in results, but if it is proof, then what is it proof of?
Originally posted by justgeneric
On the other hand I am a believer that things, all things...happen for a reason, whether that reason is immediately known or understood or even recognized is a mute point.
Originally posted by justgeneric
I am also a firm believer that if one feels need to "find" or "create" meaning to understand the world we live in and the events that we face daily individually or as a collective, then it is still far better than simply believing there is meaning without ever having sought it out.
Originally posted by justgeneric
Is this ability to question really a natural function or is it a cognitive function? Can it be damaged? can it be cured?
Originally posted by justgeneric
But...what of those who never question, never wonder, never conspire...I've met them and frankly they scare the be-jeezuz out of me.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
D) Proof of "FREE WILL" and "REASONABLE DOUBT".
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
D) Proof of "FREE WILL" and "REASONABLE DOUBT".
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
D) Proof of "FREE WILL" and "REASONABLE DOUBT".
It seems that your answer is merely a different reflection of my long-winded explanations posted so far.
To prove "reasonable doubt" you must first be intelligent enough to recognize "proof of conspiracy." To fight against that conspiracy is "proof of free will."
Originally posted by justgeneric
The concept of free will...is a fallacy because we are all intertwined.
Our opinions, thoughts, emotions etc are dependent completely on outside factors and other people to either substantiate them or dispel them or to expand them.
We are what we learn and we learn what we are. None of my thoughts are 100% unique. Not one. neither are yours...
Originally posted by justgeneric
If I choose a, b, c, or d then I have not utilized free will. I have utilized your will.
1. This is the result of:
a) Proof there is a God.
b) Proof there is a conspiracy
c) Proof there is a coincidence.
d) _______________________ (other) Please specify.
To choose is the choice which is not dependent on free will rather cognitive thought and some contemplation Choice is something other than free will. I'm not being difficult or dense
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
...the decisions you have made that "perfected" your current "opinion" were possibly made years if not decades ago. and, now those decisions you made years or decades ago, is how you view the world. automatic responses of how to interpret reality is made by your subconsious mind, which recieves all incoming sensory stimulation, then regergitates what it is you choose to believe...
Originally posted by justgeneric
We are what we learn and we learn what we are. None of my thoughts are 100% unique. Not one. neither are yours...
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
But, still a choice has been made to act or not act, to choose or not choose, and whatever the choice is that you have chosen, a choice has still been made, and evidently you had someone's will available to make that choice to choose or not to choose.
What I'd like to ask now is, "Why put this poll in ATS?" This thread does not indicate any inclusion of "conspiracy" within it...Also, it's more "philosophical" than "religious".
So far, I've never said that all my thoughts are 100% original...How could they be if the only way to express these thoughts have to be filtered through the limited concept of "written language" that's been developing & evolving through (continued) use by literally billions of other minds through time?
If you can follow that last statement, please explain it to me...I'm having a bit of trouble with it myself.
(from WikiPedia)Determinism is the philosophical proposition that every event, including human cognition and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences. No wholly random, spontaneous, mysterious, or miraculous events occur, according to this philosophy.