It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Sounds

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 12:45 AM
link   
Take a look at this video. External Link Its some demo guys imploding a building in france. Then watch a tape of WTC 1 or WTC 2 coming down. When they start blowing up the French building you hear it. BAM! BAM! Loud Charges. Reall loud. Even as the building is coming down they charge are so loud you can hear tem over the collappse. With the towers their size is so massive that any charges used to blow away loud bearing beams would be clearly audible. And you can't cover up sound. Every one in new york would have heard it.




posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 01:40 PM
link   
Does any one have a responce? This is pretty good evidence that the CD theroy is flawed, and no one has anything to say? You can't just ignore evidence from the side you dont agree with. You have a priortity to be a freethink first and a CD theroy believer or what ever you believe second. This has to be acocounted for, the explsiosn would have made a huge sound right before the explosion.



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 02:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by squidbones
This has to be acocounted for, the explsiosn would have made a huge sound right before the explosion.


A prominent idea is that nanothermite-derived devices (look up "nanoenergetics") initiated the collapses and were perhaps otherwise involved. These don't make explosive sounds.

Some resources on nanoenergetics/nano-("super") thermite:
www.p2pays.org...
www.ctonet.org...
pdf.aiaa.org...


Thus the collapses would be allowed to begin without obvious sounds or visuals. Thus, also, WTC2 tilted outwards ~15 degrees before its symmetrical vertical collapse began.



After the initiations, the collapse gradually grew to a massive roar, with eyewitnesses reporting a lot of distinct "booms" or "bams" in the process, that they would be able to feel, if not hear clearly, though audio equipment wasn't keen on picking this up beyond a roar of static-like sounds.


Here's a clip I made a while ago using the sound of C4 exploding repeatedly in very short intervals of time:
media.putfile.com...

If more conventional explosives were used, and the building brought down floor-by-floor, literally at a rate of around 7 or 8 floors a second, that's the kind of sounds you could expect.



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by squidbones
Does any one have a responce? This is pretty good evidence that the CD theroy is flawed, and no one has anything to say? You can't just ignore evidence from the side you dont agree with. You have a priortity to be a freethink first and a CD theroy believer or what ever you believe second. This has to be acocounted for, the explsiosn would have made a huge sound right before the explosion.

I am preparing a video that will explain that to you.
Gimme some time, there were sounds, sounds that were heard from across the river.



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Thanks for the link Squid.

Found this on the same site;

www.implosionworld.com...

Click on the building in the top right corner below the main screen. The Phillips building in Norway.

Just thought it looked kind of familiar......... just cant imagine where I've seen something like that before.................


MR



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 04:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by squidbones
Take a look at this video. External Link Its some demo guys imploding a building in france. Then watch a tape of WTC 1 or WTC 2 coming down. When they start blowing up the French building you hear it. BAM! BAM! Loud Charges. Reall loud. Even as the building is coming down they charge are so loud you can hear them over the collapse. With the towers their size is so massive that any charges used to blow away loud bearing beams would be clearly audible. And you can't cover up sound. Every one in new york would have heard it.

I suggest you watch this documentary below, the Google Video link will take you to the part 2 of 3.
video.google.com...
The documentary is called 9/11 Eyewitness and it explains in great details how the rumble sounds were heard not only during the tower's implosion but BEFORE the onset of the collapse as well. That part 2 of 3 will show you somewhere in there how the noises were heard and how loud and pretty detailed too.
You can watch the whole documentary here:
video.google.com...

Strangely enough, some extremely loud demolition sounds were heard just before the WTC7 collapse as well. See the following YouTube link for details:
www.youtube.com...

Then when it's all said and done, ask yourself why bomb sniffing dogs were removed from WTC complex just days before 9/11


[edit on 28-11-2006 by Pepe Lapiu]



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 04:18 PM
link   
Now squidbones, how about you watch the clips I submitted above in my last post and explain to me how not only were there BOOMs and crackling sounds heard but how did they occur BEFORE the onset of the collapses?

Furthermore, if you listen to almost every reports and videos you see, you can tell rubbles and explosions. Of course, a video cam with a mic at close proximity is likely to only record a toned down version of the explosions but you can hear them.
You also have to understand that literally thousands of joints had to be blasted at every floor and there was 110 of those floors and it all collapsed inside less than 10 seconds, so you are not likely to heard a lot of distinct BOOMs, but rather one continuous thunder like sound made up of thousands of smaller explosions combined.

[edit on 28-11-2006 by Pepe Lapiu]



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 09:01 PM
link   
Not every joint had to be exploded, just enough to get the collapse started. And if Nanothermite was used to get things started then the whole deal aboust squibs cant be true. And thermite burns straight dow really really fast.



posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 10:49 PM
link   
(Underline mine



Originally posted by squidbones
Not every joint had to be exploded, just enough to get the collapse started.


Anything other than words to support this?


And if Nanothermite was used to get things started then the whole deal aboust squibs cant be true.


Can you run us through your logic on this one?



posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Marlborough Red
Click on the building in the top right corner below the main screen. The Phillips building in Norway.

Just thought it looked kind of familiar......... just cant imagine where I've seen something like that before.................


MR


Holy controlled demolition Batman!

It's nagging me, too. Can't quite place it...



posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 09:20 PM
link   
The sound of explosions caught on video?

hitlerwasright.blogspot.com...

You tell me. Sounds like explosives too me. Couldn't possibly be airline fuel after an hour of fire.

I say lets have a democratic vote on this again. To solve the debate once and for all.

Raise your hand for those who believe that the building was brought down by explosives

Raise your hand for those who believe it was the airline fuel and an hour or so of fire.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join