It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Lyndon Larouche - Anyone?! [Important!]

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 10:43 PM
I am pretty confused as recently i have stumbled upon this interesting person; Lyndon Larouche. He seems to state very clearly what is, and will be happening in regards of the US and global situation.
He also keeps applying in elections for the US president.

When i watch or read his speeches things seem clear and objective. But the media and other institutions seem to discredit him as an antisemitic, right-wing "conspiracy theorist". (God i hate this word.)

The point is: How can a man which apparently seems to care so much about the global population be antisemitic? His Speeches are awesome and he makes a big effort for political success, although its evidently pretty hard to fight against the singularity of public, controlled media.

He is described as sect-leader and also very often accused of leading young people to perform suicidical acts and the like.

Can anyone clear me up? Is he one of the good or bad guys? Because for what i have researched it looks more like discriminination and disinformation tactics used by the governments/media, as they always do with people or movements who actually know and propagate the truth.

As i said: He reveals some very interesting aspects.

LaRouche Berlin Webcast - World Crisis on The Eve of the U.S. General Election - Oct. 31, 2006 from Berlin

You know the worst and best moments in history come to most people, of the time, as a surprise. And that is going to be the case with what's happening in the world now. We are now at the end of an entire period of history. During the middle of September, in the U.S. and other parts of the world affected directly by the U.S., there was the beginning of a new downturn in the world economy. This is somewhat complicated by the fact that there is an election campaign, so-called midterm election, now occurring inside the United States. The party in power is losing power, that is, losing power in terms of support from the people. It is preparing to commit great electoral fraud in the United States, to try to keep some of that power. It is prepared to go to war, to try to preempt the situation, the political situation, to retain power. But it also has long-term intentions to establish world dictatorship, called globalization, which would mean a disaster for all humanity.

I hope someone knows more about him and can actually clear me up. If the Cheney-Couple and other insitutions are putting so much effort into discrediting this person there must be something wierd about it! (Even in wikipedia you can find some antisemitic gossip about him.)

[edit on 27-11-2006 by osram]

[edit on 11/28/2006 by Gools]

posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 10:53 PM

Jimmy Carter: "Maybe Mr. Bender can get a spot in the closet of presidential losers."
Bob Dole: "Bob Dole needs company. LaRouche won't stop with the knock-knock jokes."
Bender: "Pass."


Seriously now, here is a link to the website of Webster G. Tarpley, a steadfast supporter of Larouche and sworn foe of the Bush family.

Tarpley Link

And here is a link to the Larouchepub:


[edit on 28/11/2006 by Beelzebubba]

posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 11:11 PM
Ive watched quite a few Larouche video's and a mate of mine gets his news letters monthly so I have had a little exposure to him.
He seems very genuine but like alot of these people pushing the financial meltdown senario who sell stuff send up alarm bells for me. He also has this annoying tendancy to big note himself as someone super important who has made several attempts at the Presidency but has had no success.

You have to filter what these kind of people are saying because like it or not he is making money off his words, so to perpetuate the revenue stream he has to make statements that are interesting for his subscription base plan and simple.

posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 11:28 PM
from what I read he got the screw job pretty hard & ended up in prison. he seemed to have a pretty good case. I had a pretty good thread on this a while back. will see if I cant find it. never heard anything about leading people to suicidal acts before. whats the story with that?

posted on Nov, 27 2006 @ 11:35 PM
lydon larouche has been fighting the illuminati since the seventies. that is why you've never heard of him, even though he's ryun for president several times.

he is genuine, and a man of good will. he is alex jones the first.

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 01:05 AM

from what I read he got the screw job pretty hard & ended up in prison.

Yeah because they sent the IRS after him, and he was then unable to run for the 2000 election against Bush. Larouche is a great guy, he's fighting the NWO, fighting for the people. If the people would stop believe the stupid non-existent democrats-republicans thing, they could elect a good guy, not a corporatist.

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 10:59 AM
@ Beelzebubba i didnt really see what you wanted to say with that quote and those links. I assume you want to tell me that someone who does not manage to become us-president, or president in any other country by means of his active movement is not worth it?

I really couldn't do much with that information. Thx anyway, specially for the other replies. I'm glad that i was pretty much right with my assumptions about Larouche.

It's pretty hard to say who can be believed and whom not nowadays, since donations or payment is not a very reliable indicator.

Concerning the disinformation taking place around Lyndon Larouche:

Cheney Behind Press Campaign - Duggan Hoax Rewarmed Again

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

November 8, 2006

London sources tied intimately to both U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney and his wife, Mrs. Lynne Cheney, have once again launched a press campaign on behalf of a repeatedly discredited hoax concerning the causes and circumstances of the suicide by a young, emotionally troubled British national, Jeremy Duggan, who, as the official forensic evidence showed beyond doubt, threw himself repeatedly against moving automobiles on a highway near Wiesbaden, Germany.

And i think what i post at the end is the related story with some other interesting informations which actually seem hard to believe for me. If I read that some young lad calls his mum a last time and tells her that he's in "W - I - E - S.." (BADEN) without being able to bring the word to an end .. and then kills himself by walking into driving cars on the street.. sounds more like the friggin government has something to do with it.

They can't hide forever. They can't always give others the fault for all the people who die thanks to their politics. They can't declare every opposing opinion as "shizofrenic" or fascist.. for ever.

The Independent (London) 28 August 2003

Some have accused him of running a political cult. His followers are disciplined and young. "Give me 1,000 more youth leaders like these,'' he told the LaRouche Youth Movement in a recent webcast, "and I'll take over the country.'' There have been claims by ex-members of his "cadres" that emotional manipulation is used to bind people to the cause. In Germany his political party, the EAP, was in 1996 decreed by the government to be a "political sect".

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 01:00 PM
I have read a number of his articles and they all seem legit to me. I remember him running for president and I also remember about 20 years ago, when AIDS was still fairly new, that he wanted to round up all the homosexuals and put them in detention camps for quarantine. I'd say he has some good things to say and also that he is a little bit of a nut.

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 04:11 PM
Wow. Just, wow.

Operation Mop Up

In 1973, the predominantly White LaRouche group, the National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC), attempted to take over the Black-led National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). When the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), objected and tried to assist the NWRO, LaRouche's followers in NCLC were ordered to brutally assault members of the CPUSA. When members of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), helped defend victims of the attacks, they were added to the enemies list. NCLC thugs used bats, chains, and martial arts weapons in a campaign to establish "hegemony" over the American revolutionary movement. There were many injuries and some persons required hospitalization.

"Our hearts were not in it," a former NCLC member says about his participation in Operation Mop-Up. "But with LaRouche it was all or nothing; the attacks were supposed to harden the membership." Forcing student intellectuals into violent confrontations was an exercise in self-degradation which cemented their loyalty to NCLC, ex-members say, Their working-class Marxism gave way to an unquestioning, cult-like devotion to LaRouche. "Most of us now find the whole thing was crazy," says a seven-year NCLC veteran who left the group in the mid-1970's.

So that's alright is it? Hey, but maybe I'm being a bit harsh, you say. What would Lyndon say about himself:

Selected quotes
"Apart from those accomplishments which are as much an organic product of the U.S. Labor Party as my own efforts, my principal accomplishment is that of being, by a large margin of advantage, the leading economist of the twentieth century to date. That distinction can be most easily defended, since it is not quantitative, but qualitative."

"The Power of Reason - A Kind of an Autobiography", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., New Benjamin Franklin Publishing House, 1979

Again. Wow, Well, maybe he's just a bit close to er, himself. Let's see what a colleague of his from the Communist Party (yes that's right, he was a commie before he became a facist demagogue) has to say about ol' Lyndan:

A 60's Socialist takes a hard right
In the summer of 1965 I headed a small group of Trotskyists, the American Committee for the Fourth International (ACFI), which had split from the SWP in September 1964. LaRouche and his new wife, Carol, left the SWP and joined our small group. For about six months thereafter I met with LaRouche almost everyday.

...LaRouche churned out lengthy typewritten documents. He had already developed many of the basic ideas that flowered in his days as an independent leftist and that he later adapted to his rightist politics.

LaRouche had a gargantuan ego. Convinced he was a genius, he combined his strong conviction in his own abilities with an arrogance expressed in the cadences of upper-class New England. He assumed that the comment in the Communist Manifesto that "a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class..." was written specifically for him. And he believed that the working class was lucky to obtain his services.

Actions speak louder than words. His actions are screaming like a lurching maniac, throwing bricks off his roof at passers by. Give him a wide berth, as the stains may be hard to wash out. In short, I think he's a whack job.

posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 03:29 AM

Im pretty sure he did some time as well mate.

posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 03:49 AM
His property backed up to a friend of mine's property here in Virginia (this is almost 20 years ago now) and he liked to take walks. His walks always took him onto my friend's property, which isn't a big deal, however he always had his armed bodyguards with him. Of the times I observed this, twice we were warned off by his bodyguards to "keep back and stay on the porch". This behavior didn't encourage me to support him politically.

just my 2 cents

posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 09:15 AM
More on Lyndon LaRouche:

In 1999, an article in the LaRouche-controlled Executive Intelligence Review accused senior advisers to the Royal family and MI6 of planning to assassinate him, after a British women's magazine called Take a Break published a critical article about him. [3]

On August 2, 1999, Debra Hanania-Freeman, national spokeswoman for LaRouche, issued the following statement about the alleged threat: "After consulting with security experts familiar with the modus operandi of British intelligence networks, we are treating the piece as a cover for an MI6 order, probably with direct backing from someone in the royal household, to assassinate Lyndon LaRouche.... The inflammatory article ... reflects a growing hysteria around Buckingham Palace, over the growing global influence of LaRouche's ideas and his continuing exposé of the British oligarchy...

"We are also passing the information on to the White House so they can assess whether the article also constitutes a threat to the security of President Clinton." Source

Saying things like that and the following tend to cause people to look at you with less than total acceptance:

In "An Open Letter to President Brezhnev" (June 2, 1981) LaRouche identified those pushing the world toward war as "the forces behind the World Wildlife Fund, the Club of Rome, and the heritage of H. G. Wells and the evil Bertrand Russell." Source

Frankly, until I saw the OP in this thread, I thought the man was probably dead; I had not heard anything about him for years. I had decided, though, way back in the late '70's - early '80's, that the man was a crackpot.

posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 11:59 PM
he is right about bertrand russel, h.g. wells, and aldous huxley, too. they helped lay out the blueprint for the NWO. 'brave new world' is not just a science fiction novel. there is a line in that book that goes something like, 'if i was going to have a dictatorship, i would convince everyone it was a democracy'.
and the club of rome should not be a surprise, or seem unlikely as an appendage of the NWO.

we are programmed from birth, and it is hard to break out of our little matrix pods and yank out those brain input tubes(mass media/popular lore).

did time? i'm surprised 'they' haven't killed him, yet. he lets the truth be known about the programmers and their programs. i guess character assassination is even more effective than actual assassination. looks like most of you fell for it.

imagine if they HAD quarantined aids sufferers when it was still only carried by a few hundred people in north america. it wouldn't be the rampant epidemic that it is, today.

of course, that would go against the depopulation agenda, wouldn't it? the supposed 'discoverer' of aids, was actually the designer of aids.

these, of course, are my opinions based on my research, and i only state them as fact because it is what i believe. it would take thousands of words to 'convince' anyone. you have to want it and find it yourself when it comes to anything anti-illuminati.

top topics


log in