I've only just heard of this idea.
I can understand how they could have got the date wrong with the Gregorian calender. It's could just be a mathematical error. (Measure twice cut
once?)
But surely dating techniques would have picked up an anomaly as big as a 300 year gap. I'm going to have to go back and brush up on the Timelines for
the period.
P.S. I cant believe this has had so few replies in FIVE years???
S&F. I hope this thread gets more attention. I can think of a few members whose comments I'd be interested in.

