inside dulce 5th level blood lab photo, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 25-11-2006 @ 09:27 AM by observe50
For myself I think John has been patient with some of the remarks and insults some of you have made. I believe he has a dry sense of humor and he quacks me up.

The only proof the skeptics here are going to accept (yes you have a right to be a skeptic) is a live visit up close and personnel contact, ain't gonna happen. Let me tell you it doesn't matter how open minded you think you are or how brave you think you are.... (if they come for you and they may just one day come for you)... you will see that maybe you aren't who you thought you were.

I have shared experiences here with you about the Grey's and you just think I'm a crazy old woman. Your mistake is not going with your gut and knowing and being able to sense truths, this is what is so nice about the net. The human race still does not trust in one another.

I know I have and I know others here have tried to share with you information but that isn't good enough you need the PROOF. From what I see there is a lot of proof but nothing is good enough for you and you come here and take out your frustrations on those of us whom try to make you aware.

For the skeptics here I will say you probably aren't going to get the proof you seek here so why waste you time. Those of us that "know" may just stop coming here and giving you information since it seems you are not satisfied with the way it is or isn't presented.

I have a suggestion which I am sure you will not take.

Evolve.

Sometimes to move forward you must take a step back. The answers are the simplest the ones you always overlook.

You must all have your own faith, hope, love within yourself and share and spread peace.

How do you want Earth to be? How do you want to live... then begin to do what is needed to make it that way.


reply posted on 25-11-2006 @ 09:57 AM by HankMcCoy
Originally posted by observe50
For myself I think John has been patient with some of the remarks and insults some of you have made. I believe he has a dry sense of humor and he quacks me up.


What about the ones that are being patient with johnlear? johnlear makes some pretty fantastic claims, which he clearly states is opinion. If he or ANYONE is gonna share his opinions, his theories, and his evidence, I am RIGHT there with him and I will defend his position as someone giving an opinion.

But when someone starts talking about evidence they wont share, and that the people that dont have access to that information are somehow lesser because of it, whether it be people with hard evidence or people that simply claim aliens only comunicate with them because they are more enlightended, THAT is when I decide to question.

Do I want johnlear to share evidence that will get him in trouble? No, of course not. I would not want to see any harm come to him, but that would be the only reason I can think of that I would accept for someone to simply keep evidence away from the public. I don't think this is the case, however, because johnlear wouldn't have said ANYTHING about it if he thought trouble would come to him or his family.

So, that leaves few other options, really. Disinformation? Fraud? Foot in Mouth Disorder? Better Than Thou Complex? You can't read what johnlear has stated in this thread (knowing about his other posts) WITHOUT wondering where his loyalties really lie.

Another thing I noticed resently is that johnlear doesn't really start threads, he just steers them after they have been started by others. Kind of interesting to me. Its like he only gives information that is directly asked about, without offering information on the fringes.

Yes, I am sorry for hijacking the thread with this, but johnlear doesn't make threads, and I don't think I could get away with starting a thread about johnlear which calls all this into question, so until I get some kind of thumbs up from someone that allows for the general discussion in a thread of its own, all I can do is make the points where I see them.

[edit on 25-11-2006 by HankMcCoy]


reply posted on 25-11-2006 @ 10:26 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by johnlear
The fact that I am not passing that evidence on to you doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means I am leaving you uninformed.



AboveTopSecret.com is intended to be a collaborative environment. I strongly suggest you begin to treat the intent of this site, and especially the membership with an improved level of respect.

Thank you.


Good morning SkepticOverlord. I was just wondering about your warning. Would this be like the level of respect accorded me by the 3 Amigos, Snicker, Giggle and Snivel on their nationwide radio program about my WTC holograph theory? I don't believe I have received an apology yet from you or your beer swilling friends for that crude and discourteous conduct. I offered the holograph theory in the best traditions of conspiracy.

Regarding Dulce I have asked what will satisy the rank and file as to evidence that it exists and have received not one single proposal. If you think I would betray my informants about the Dulce Facility to satisfy the ATS membership you are sorely mistaken.

I didn't start the Dulce thread. I offered what information I could without betraying my friends or their families. Now I have to prove it? You probably think Dulce is a joke.

ATS is a conspiracy theory forum. Theory is defined as a "statement of possible truth".

Let me respectfully suggest you re-evalute your warning and throw in an apology for good measure. Thanks, and have a great weekend.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Old Forgotten Bunker?
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags